Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

June [July] inflation

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by l_boy, Jul 11, 2023.

  1. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    But if inflation keeps dropping every month how is 3 the new baseline? Just wait till the productivity gains of AI kick in. We’re seeing it already in the travel industry. My company is now testing Microsoft Office copilot and has just rolled out Halo BI on top of Tableau and Congos. I do in an hour what it used to take all day (at least). Tip of the hat to me!
     
    Last edited: Aug 15, 2023
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  2. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007

    You didn’t read it then. Thanks for confirming.
     
  3. snatchmagnet

    snatchmagnet Bring On The Bacon Premium Member

    2,587
    509
    2,088
    Apr 3, 2007
    Parts Unknown
    A little inflation is normal. It went from 1-2 to 8 then back to 3. Last month went up again. Need to see a few more months, but 3 seems to be the new number
     
  4. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    To be fair to me you’ve not demonstrated an understanding what you consume wrt to markets and the economy so I drive by your links.

    I knew without looking that wage growth has outpaced inflation in 2023 (though that growth has probably plateaued ) but here you go.

    Wage growth vs inflation U.S. 2023 | Statista

    But I did you a solid and read your link. Moodys sounds pretty sanguine about the current and future state of affairs. So not sure what point you’re trying to make..
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    If 3 were the new number, that would be ok. I don't agree with the Fed doggedly raising interest rates until we get back down to 2. There's no real reason why 2 is better than 3. A price rising from $10.00 to $10.20 or $10.00 to $10.30 over the course of a year is a pretty meaningless difference as long as everyone knows what to expect.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  6. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,916
    1,085
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    Based on what exactly? The Fed and top economists think 2% is the target. Moving it 50% higher will surely have negative consequences if they believe 2% the optimal rate to prevent deflation, and provide stable pricing and jobs.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    There's no consensus on it. 2 vs 3 is pretty arbitrary.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,916
    1,085
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    What do you consider “consensus?” The Fed has been pretty consistent that 2% is the goal. Throw in the EU, UK, Canada, New Zealand, etc. all with 2% targets and it’s hard to say it’s not a consensus, at least amongst those controlling fiscal policy in first world nations.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,035
    2,629
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    LOL. Thanks for admitting you didn't read the article. So $709 PER month from 2 years ago is good? That is $8,500 a year. Holy crap. Maybe turn off MSNBC and CNN for a minute. People are struggling. IF you think this isn't an issue than you aren't paying attention.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    The point is wages have risen too. At least acknowledge that.
     
  12. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes, just not as much as needed to offset the rise in prices.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Per BLS numbers wages have risen more than prices between Jan 2020 and July 2023.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  14. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    I posted the data showing the 2 year price increase of $8,500 from 2 years ago. Use the last 2 years. Wages up $8,500?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    And I'm looking at pre-pandemic to now. People are actually better off now than they were in Jan 2020 according to BLS numbers.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  16. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    No they aren't. This shows from the 1st Quarter of Jan 2020 wages increased $624 a month. Not better off when you factor in inflation.

    https://www.bls.gov/news.release/pdf/wkyeng.pdf

    upload_2023-8-16_13-14-3.png
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Yeah I'm looking at the increase in the CPI between Jan 2020 and now vs the increase in the average wage between Jan 2020 and now. The average wage has increased slightly more than CPI over that time. Your numbers show they have essentially increased at the same rate. But I'm using monthly data and you are showing quarterly data. Either way, people aren't worse off now than they were in Jan 2020.
     
  18. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,866
    864
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's not the same rate. That's the issue. You are using large exaggerations to try to make it look better because a Dem president is in the WH. You would be arguing my way if it was an R President. At least try to hide your partisanship.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Your numbers show real median weekly earnings at $367 in Q1 2020 and $365 in Q2 2023. That's essentially the same. Me saying that's essentially the same rate is not a large exaggeration. But you saying it's a large exaggeration is a large exaggeration.

    And if you include the July numbers, wages have fully caught up. Real wages rose 1.9% between July 2022 and July 2023 and 0.3% between June 2023 and July 2023.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,707
    1,374
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    That's rich coming from you
     
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1