Not piling on. I honestly don't know his music much, but have friends who are big fans. By your comment, I'm guessing you're the vocalist . At any rate, I'm not comparing your timbre to that of Tom Waits's; more the phrasing & some of the aesthetic. But seriously, does this mean you don't like him? Thought you might at least approve of his rebellious "sensibility."
14% of food stamps go to able bodied working age adult families with no children in the household. About half of all recipients are families with children, 1/4 are caring for elderly and most of the rest have disabled members leaving that 14%. Those 14% remaining include drug addicts and those with mental health issues. Now, studies show 98.5% of food stamps are fraud and abuse free. Knowing all that, are you really upset with the fringe issues around food stamps? Why the hell are we giving tax breaks to companies that are not poor, elderly, nor disabled? They are rich and wealthy. Focus some ire there.
Interesting. They've never given me any farm income stabilization as the consumer. Where do I get it? But I'm happy to see after a few pages of impotent posturing and an inability to meaningfully respond to people's critiques of your idea, you've decided to call it quits. Hopefully, your arguments in the sports forums are better reasoned.
You have the audacity to call someone stupid when in fact you are wrong. Farm subsidies were to help farmers and to maintain a robust food supply. Farm price supports maintain a minimum price and can increase the price. Much of the excess due to higher prices is exported.
Yup. I have no doubt that there are societally beneficial policy goals behind farm subsidies. But the same is true for food stamps.
Damn you are gullible. Farm *insurance* in principle/theory benefits the consumer. I’m sure we all must remember some basic history as to how farm insurance was put in place to stabilize food markets after the Great Depression and the dust bowl. Farm *subsidies* primarily benefit corporate farms, and in many case do nothing for either the small farmer or the consumer. Look at the corn lobby as the most classic example. You think those lobbyists are looking out for the consumer or just looking at the stabilization of markets that insurance brings? Hell no. The fact that particular lobby is so powerful should give you a clue. Hello McFly! It’s $$$. They are looking for million dollar handouts. Govt paying billions of dollars (in total) to increasingly large operators, so we end up with so much corn we don’t even know what to do with it (end up using it as refined sweeteners or even fuel when the benefits of doing so are questionable at best). Almost every product is sweetened with corn. Literally subsidizing diabetes and cancer. Fortunately there is some movement against this, but I continually wonder why we “subsidize” corn at all given the excess of that crop.
I’d say the goals of farm supports were commendable but at this point it is just political - buying votes and corporate welfare.
This place eats weak debaters. That was like watching a run team go to the air after getting down early. Butt ugly. Dude opened up with asking for meaningful debate and then attacked the first person who challenged him by calling them a 5th grader and devolved from there. Then he bailed. Division 3 talent.
Exactly. It's in Donzo's (and all of our) best interests for poor people to not go hungry. History is rife with examples of what happens when they are not fed.
That ought to end the discussion. Also, it’s one thing to witness and be disturbed by something, and quite another to verbally accost people.
This was a fun read. "People on food stamps shouldn't be allowed to buy alcohol or tobacco with them." "They can't." "Oh then we should stop them from buying those with any other money they may have." "That would be impractical and cost prohibitive to implement." "YOU'RE ALL STUPID AND I HATE YOU." Never change Too Hot lol
with Ukraine and Russian farm production down, hopefully we are cutting subsidies and increasing production as food prices prepare to soar. paying people/corporations not to farm jsut to keep the price high to support higher prices for farm land makes no sense
Well, I've gotten way too many "agrees" and "likes" on this thread from right wing posters that I generally have little in common with over the last 7 years. I'm gonna go drink some bourbon and reevaluate my life.
"Choose to be underemployed?" WTF!! That's bullshit and it blows your credibility on this subject big time.