Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

"News Avoidance" on the rise

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by DesertGator, Aug 1, 2023.

Page 2 of 3
  1. Aug 1, 2023 #21
    tigator2019

    tigator2019 GC Hall of Fame

    1,465
    2,577
    1,873
    Dec 25, 2018
    In my head--- UF
    We watch Reuters and BBC news on Roku and true ‘news’ in first 5 mins on streaming.

    NY times for rest
     
    • Like Like x 2
  2. Aug 1, 2023 #22
    defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    • Winner Winner x 2
  3. Aug 1, 2023 #23
    G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,705
    942
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    I wouldn't consider the local news to be deplorable
     
  4. Aug 1, 2023 #24
    VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,455
    1,790
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Interesting that the CNN article is much more accurate than the Fox headline.
     
  5. Aug 1, 2023 #25
    tigator2019

    tigator2019 GC Hall of Fame

    1,465
    2,577
    1,873
    Dec 25, 2018
    In my head--- UF
    it could be user error on my part. I read nothing about the vaccine in the first two stories.
     
  6. Aug 1, 2023 #26
    defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    The implications of the vax were implied in wake of Bronny James collapsing the other day and the vitriol about was it the vax or not.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. Aug 1, 2023 #27
    defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    More accurate but definitely skewed. It would have only taken a few more keystrokes to say "placed on NFI list."
     
  8. Aug 1, 2023 #28
    defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
  9. Aug 1, 2023 #29
    G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,480
    12,170
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    RemovePaywall | Free online paywall remover
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. Aug 1, 2023 #30
    tigator2019

    tigator2019 GC Hall of Fame

    1,465
    2,577
    1,873
    Dec 25, 2018
    In my head--- UF
    where is zero mention of the vaccine . there is zero mention of James. Now you are making stuff up
     
  11. Aug 1, 2023 #31
    duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,461
    1,208
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    I do. Ex: same applies, never asked the first hard question on ‘Covid.’ Go you one better: during the height of hysteria our governor delivered daily televised briefings during which local reporters acted as snitches.
     
  12. Aug 1, 2023 #32
    defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    Did you miss the James thread? There is zero chance a person who clicks on the articles I linked didn't already have the James story in their head.
     
  13. Aug 1, 2023 #33
    AndyGator

    AndyGator GC Hall of Fame

    3,598
    352
    338
    Apr 10, 2007
    read news for information, watch news for entertainment.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. Aug 1, 2023 #34
    Gatorhead

    Gatorhead GC Hall of Fame

    18,131
    6,054
    3,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philadelphia
    CNN and Fox are both paying the price for being political ideologues, selling cheap, worthless partisan BS to the American public.

    I hope they both go out of business.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. Aug 1, 2023 #35
    jhenderson251

    jhenderson251 Premium Member

    3,406
    572
    2,043
    Aug 7, 2008
    So you're example explaining why more people are avoiding the news... is a collection of similar articles that would require readers to have knowledge of another news story?

    I don't think that's as ironclad of an example/argument as you're attempting to make.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. Aug 1, 2023 #36
    G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,480
    12,170
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    i see it more a a reality avoidance. people do not want to hear what they don't want to hear so they are seeking out sources that tell them what they want to hear, be it youtube or reddit or qchan or facebook
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  17. Aug 1, 2023 #37
    jhenderson251

    jhenderson251 Premium Member

    3,406
    572
    2,043
    Aug 7, 2008
    This, combined with cable news squandering public trust by saturating viewers with sensationalism and "breaking news" on a 24/7 cycle in an attempt to keep ratings high and sell more advertisements.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Aug 1, 2023 #38
    rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,670
    1,791
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Times-Union used to have about 200 people in the newsroom. Now I hear it’s less than 25
     
  19. Aug 1, 2023 #39
    channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,251
    2,083
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    And I'd imagine 3 of those cover the Jags. Nate Monroe, as annoying as he is sometimes, does really good work.

    Maybe it's wishful thinking, but I'd think the pendulum will swing back and they'll figure out a better way to monetize the local papers. At least in a bigger city like Jax. It's sad, because half the comments of Facebook are "I can't read this because it's behind a paywall." Yeah no shit, dipstick...

    Small town papers unfortunately stand no chance.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. Aug 1, 2023 #40
    DesertGator

    DesertGator VIP Member

    4,525
    2,341
    2,013
    Apr 10, 2007
    Frisco, TX
    Maybe that enters into the equation, but not as much as one would think. My opinion is that its a much simpler root cause. The technology of the day and the inevitable "need to have it first to make the most money" attitude of the world is more to blame.

    It used to be people had to buy tangible news publications. So the headlines had to be succinct yet descriptive enough to grab people's attention and make them want to purchase the news. They had to take the time to actually reach into their pockets to trade a tangible object for a tangible object.

    Then it slowly morphed in television and online publications (before today's "quick link media", only the major publications really had any kind of mainstream audience) grabbing people with those headlines. It took far less time to browse the channels and the headlines than it did to read them on printed publications than before. And it cost a lot less taking out a lot of the skin that readers had in the game. The length of time to desire to comprehend and question the news shortened. In addition, on television you had someone feeding it to you and it was widely accepted as "accurate".

    And now, every imbecile with a keyboard and webcam can spout an opinion online and sell it as news to get advertising clicks. People hardly need to take any time to read a headline and take even less to absorb its validity or accuracy. And the big boys have to play a similar game to avoid giving up any share of the pie since there's a million "sources" out there. Which is where your assertion comes into play. It's less about escaping reality, and more about confirmation bias at that point. All that does is fuel the crazies on both fringes and John Q. Public in the middle is finally getting tired of it and turning it off entirely.
     
    Last edited: Aug 1, 2023
Page 2 of 3