I haven't read all of this thread but.....Since you've made this a family discussion, I'd remind you that Jared's dad was a convicted felon and disbarred. Add that to his FIL's various criminal/con man enterprises and it looks like Jared has learned well from his criminal mentors.
Hunter Biden is not POTUS and is not a member of Joe's cabinet. Who the heck cares about about him? If he broke then law then put him in jail. This has been going on almost 3 years and still the right wingers can't show some evidence that Joe Biden broke the law. My question is where is the evidence and when will we see it?
This will all go bye-bye as soon as a winner is announced in the 2024 presidential race. A contrivance.
Wut...Hunter isn't getting the free pass on future charges he was promised? The expression on the CNN reporters' face this morning was just priceless. "What do you mean they've left the courtroom?".
I would hope it at last shields him from other charges based on conduct from 2014-19, and anything already investigated. But not my area - don't know how these things work
I'm going to have to remove my Hunter yard signs and bumper stickers in shame now. MTG's next resolution will be to remove federal funding from any planetarium that features the Orion constellation in a show
Yeah but you probably voted for his equally corrupt dad and they are tied at the hip or at least by the bank account. I see Joe has now changed his story from I didn't know anything about my son's business matters to I never talked to my son about his business matters to the current I was never in business with my son. Why does the narrative keep changing?
LOL. Not like the House committee on penis pictures is going to uncover anything with actual evidence to support it, but the statute of limitations is his friend.
I don’t see how those statements are mutually exclusive. In any event, where is the proof? Amazing what you will believe without a single shred of proof to support it.
"Joe spent time with his son", "Joe's son called him", someone else put the note "big guy" in an email about a company Joe was never part of. I mean.. can we simply get an actual accusation of something actually illegal?
Not to mention any evidence of cash actually changing hands or policy being enacted that was "paid for", or even the ability to do so (most of this was alleged to have occurred when Joe held no office). Other than that...
