Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Supreme Court sides with web designer who refuses to do gay wedding sites...

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorGrowl, Jun 30, 2023.

  1. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,522
    2,765
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's not about free speech. It's about trying to come up with a different angle after losing the marriage equality wars, to be able to validate someone's icky reaction to gays in a more disguised manner.

    So suddenly it's about religious freedom, about free speech, from the same people who thought gays should be second class citizens before but lost that argument because it made no sense.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  2. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,610
    1,757
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Agree Agree x 7
  3. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,602
    1,825
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    Yeah, just like the named party in the student loan cases wasnt against the program, they just decided someone was harmed and sued on their behalf, didnt matter.
     
  4. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,353
    6,285
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    The version of "Christianity" practiced in far too much of this country does not have to "masquerade". It embodies and promotes bigotry openly.
     
    • Winner Winner x 7
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,522
    2,765
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Other than the hypothetical angle, the same thing with the coach praying on the sideline. The so-called factual record was completely false and contrived, known to the Court, but that was of no moment
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,527
    805
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Oh I know, it’s all quite transparent.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  7. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,353
    6,285
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Her excuse was that she did not want to be arrested under current Colorado law and languish waiting for the case to wind through the courts. Reality is, she was very likely paid by the religious Nazis in this country.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
  8. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,143
    13,182
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Handing the d party election wins on a silver platter as they are on a crusade to take things away from people while they bark about liberty. Hypocrite control freaks.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
  9. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,771
    1,163
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Don’t know why people are so wound up about LGBTQ …

    upload_2023-6-30_11-12-32.jpeg
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    No, don’t expect to be taken seriously ever uttering the words “banana republic” again.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  11. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    9,232
    2,164
    3,038
    Dec 16, 2015
    This is the america libbies are pining for.
    Sad.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  12. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,771
    1,163
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
  13. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,609
    978
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    When you breed zealots for the purpose of getting them in courts……

    Religion is way scarier than other transitive issues
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  14. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,060
    8,031
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    So does this mean a chef can now refuse to prepare a meal at his restaurant for my sister-in-law and her wife? What a country we live in.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  15. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,315
    903
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    After they told women to take of their shoes and get back in the kitchen and returned African-Americans to plantation work earlier this week, they completed the anti-republican trifecta by locking gays back in the closet.

    Now if there was also a way to stab Gen Z and millennials in the back to go 4 for 4...
     
    • Funny x 2
    • Winner x 2
    • Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Come On Man x 1
  16. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    9,232
    2,164
    3,038
    Dec 16, 2015
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  17. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,656
    979
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    I wonder if state or local governments can require businesses that refuse to provide certain services affecting protected classes to publish their policies.
     
  18. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,060
    8,031
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    I can’t wait for the first Jewish or Middle eastern merchant to refuse a Christian its services and everyone on here claiming victory today will be screaming “you can’t do that…..freedom of religion!!!!”
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  19. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,609
    978
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    United We Stand
     
  20. altalias

    altalias GC Hall of Fame

    2,633
    2,263
    2,028
    Aug 13, 2008
    I was just reading about this,
    " the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Smith’s craft was “pure speech” and that Colorado was compelling speech through its anti-discrimination law, the judges in the majority argued that granting Smith an exemption “would necessarily relegate LGBT consumers to an inferior market"

    The tenth curciit court ruled that the government has the right to compel speech?! In the "land of the free"?

    That is exactly what I was taught to fear about fascism and communism. Three Supreme Court justices supported it.
    You are wrong.

    "the Tenth Circuit Court of Appeals found that Smith’s craft was “pure speech” and that Colorado was compelling speech through its anti-discrimination law, the judges in the majority argued that granting Smith an exemption “would necessarily relegate LGBT consumers to an inferior market"

    So they were arguing that government has the right to compel speech from a minority, Christians, to promote a preferred minority, homosexuals. The argument that it wasn't speech was never made.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1