Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Supreme Court rejects affirmative action at colleges, says schools can’t consider race in admission

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorGrowl, Jun 29, 2023.

  1. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,133
    2,064
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Yawn
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
  2. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,930
    1,019
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Good thing is they said legacy admissions help diversity.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,997
    848
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    I thought reservations had an entirely separate court system.
     
  4. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,133
    2,064
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Good question. On a lot of bid submission forms it will ask if the business is female owned/minority owned/veteran owned, etc.
     
  5. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,100
    2,129
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    On tribal lands, yes. I thought the poster was referring to areas of the reservation (so to speak).
     
  6. dynogator

    dynogator VIP Member

    6,373
    318
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    What's wrong with merit-based, color-blind admissions?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  7. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,848
    1,001
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    Again, haven't read it yet, but I am wondering if the Court is wrestling with whether the goal of racial diversity in military academies presents national security implications which arguably require greater deference to the executive branch and/or military leaders. A potential concession that racial diversity and the need for diverse applicants are vital and survive strict scrutiny would be interesting in several ways. Also, it seems that the executive branch and military leaders might take different positions on such issues and the government's position on it could change depending on who's in office.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,566
    1,782
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    I agree that it was a matter of time before this ruling. But ... UF is currently 6 percent black.I'd hate to see it drop much.
    I'd hope that background is a big factor in admissions - family situation, income, education ....
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  9. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,754
    164,117
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes they do, they are considered a sovereign nation but all federal laws apply to them and their property.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,657
    1,386
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    They have a lot of autonomy, let's put it that way. For example: under EEOC laws, obviously, those ads stating "Indian preference will be observed" would be highly illegal. The Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) partners with Tribal Employment Rights Offices (TEROs). The TEROs operate under a different set of laws.
     
  11. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,754
    164,117
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes, but this ruling could impact TEROs
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  12. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,100
    2,129
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    They did? Or was that sarcasm? The legacy BS is one of the things that absolutely has to change in higher education. I’m sick of certain families, Democrats and Republicans, getting their below-average children into top-notch schools on the basis of their name.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Winner Winner x 2
  13. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,657
    1,386
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Why? If it wasn't for foreign students with visas attending UF, the demographic breakdown of the University would be pretty close to the actual population breakdown of the state. There is a 12% smaller portion of whites attending UF versus state census % of whites. Asians are about equal to census %, but if there is a higher density of superior students within the Asian population, that makes perfect sense.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,848
    1,001
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    I will be curious to read if they address legacies, for example, which are facially race-neutral but likely have disproportionate racial outcomes. Presumably, if a school decides to give all non-legacy applicants additional points (which could be conversely stated as putting legacy students at a relative disadvantage), that would be facially race-neutral but would probably amount to a relative disadvantage to White applicants since they, as a group, will be more likely to have great-grandparents, grandparents, or parents who were alumni. What level of equal protection scrutiny would that entail?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. rivergator

    rivergator Too Hot Mod Moderator VIP Member

    35,566
    1,782
    2,258
    Apr 8, 2007
    Just a gut feeling that it ought to be at least somewhat representative of the state.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,036
    1,878
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Other than being a total fantasy and the vagueness of 'merit' when it comes to attending an elite college, nothing I guess
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  17. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    10,240
    2,455
    3,288
    Dec 16, 2015
    [​IMG]
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  18. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,951
    848
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    The current racial demographics of an institution should have no bearing on racial preferences regarding future admissions.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    2,068
    724
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Nothing
    I think that is one of the reasons so many are cheering.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  20. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,100
    2,129
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Yes, but if you made that rule for one race, then you would have to make it for all of them. Next thing you know you are capping the proportion of Asian students. And to your point about reflecting the demographics of the state, how do you factor in the out-of-state and foreign students into that equation?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1