Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Supreme Court rejects affirmative action at colleges, says schools can’t consider race in admission

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorGrowl, Jun 29, 2023.

  1. GatorGrowl

    GatorGrowl Forum Admin Moderator VIP Member

    162,153
    17,774
    103,338
    Jan 19, 2012
    Paris, TN
    • The Supreme Court ruled that the affirmative action admission policies of Harvard and the University of North Carolina, which gave weight to a would-be student’s race, are unconstitutional.
    • The ruling is a massive blow to decades-old efforts to boost enrollment of racial minorities at American universities.
    • The court’s majority opinion said that both Harvard’s and UNC’s affirmative action programs “unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.”
    • Justice Sonia Sotomayor, in a sharp dissent to the opinion, said, “Today, this Court stands in the way and rolls back decades of precedent and momentous progress.”
    https://www.cnbc.com/2023/06/29/sup...-schools-cant-consider-race-in-admission.html
     
    • Like Like x 6
    • Informative Informative x 3
  2. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,922
    1,018
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Just use poverty markers. Better metric if they wish.
     
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Like Like x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Orange_and_Bluke

    Orange_and_Bluke Premium Member

    10,234
    2,454
    3,288
    Dec 16, 2015
    Perhaps we are moving closer to a country that does value equality.
     
    • Agree x 13
    • Funny x 3
    • Like x 2
    • Winner x 1
    • Off-topic x 1
  4. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,707
    1,374
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    LOL
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. magnetofsnatch

    magnetofsnatch Rudy Ray Moore’s Idol Premium Member

    1,061
    288
    1,783
    Apr 10, 2020
    North Florida
    About time. Even in the original ruling O’Connor remarked this will need to be revisited.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. GatorFanCF

    GatorFanCF Premium Member

    5,194
    1,006
    1,968
    Apr 14, 2007
    “The way to stop discrimination on the basis of race,” Chief Justice John Roberts wrote in 2007, “is to stop discriminating on the basis of race.” - Atlantic.

    Hear, hear.
     
    • Winner Winner x 13
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  7. GatorGrowl

    GatorGrowl Forum Admin Moderator VIP Member

    162,153
    17,774
    103,338
    Jan 19, 2012
    Paris, TN
    The majority opinion by Chief Justice John Roberts, which all five of his fellow conservative justices joined in, said that both Harvard’s and UNC’s affirmative action programs “unavoidably employ race in a negative manner, involve racial stereotyping, and lack meaningful end points.”
     
    • Winner Winner x 5
    • Agree Agree x 2
  8. magnetofsnatch

    magnetofsnatch Rudy Ray Moore’s Idol Premium Member

    1,061
    288
    1,783
    Apr 10, 2020
    North Florida
    Uh bingo.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,637
    1,386
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,847
    1,001
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    Have not read the opinions but did see they declined to apply the ruling to military academies at least for now. I wonder what the interests may be there that could survive strict scrutiny. They also ruled that applicants will be permitted to reference their race in terms of inspiration, overcoming adversity, etc. Will be interesting to read the details and also see how admissions numbers play out in coming years.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,637
    1,386
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
     
  12. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,950
    848
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    A far more justifiable factor in my opinion.

    This was eventually going to happen. The only question is whether this was premature.

    The longer affirmative action was around, the less likely it was to survive Constitutional scrutiny.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 2
  13. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,692
    164,100
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Will the ruling extend beyond college admissions, for example job hiring practices? In Oklahoma you see Indian tribes that put in their ads for suppliers, contractors, even hiring that "Indian preference will be observed."
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  14. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,077
    2,126
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Good news. The 14th Amendment needs to mean something all of the time to everyone, not just when it’s convenient here and there. The most glaring injustice in this was faced by Americans of East Asian descent. Schools would treat them like the grades and scores they earned were somehow “unfair” and needed to be “handicapped” in some way. As stated above, I have no problem with considering bonafide poverty in admissions.
     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Winner Winner x 2
  15. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,999
    1,874
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    College is for white people, wars are for racial minorities
     
    • Come On Man x 8
    • Disagree Bacon! x 3
    • Like x 2
    • Dislike x 1
    • Funny x 1
    • Winner x 1
    • Informative x 1
    • Creative x 1
  16. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,077
    2,126
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    I think and hope so. Brown v. Board of Education only dealt with school segregation but ultimately and rightly led to the abolishment of all other forms of legal segregation as well.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise Hurricane Hunter

    15,716
    26,021
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    You would think not. Don't tribal nations have some form of autonomy?
     
  18. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,950
    848
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Not ALL, but I get your point.

    This is the tip of the iceberg and more changes will be coming in the coming years, some quicker than others.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,120
    2,056
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    From a constitutional interpretation perspective I think this is the right answer and the correct ruling.

    But the folks saying this is a win for equality are also cheering on the gutting of public schools, where most minorities have the best chance to better their standing in life. So I don't understand ya'll.
     
    • Agree Agree x 6
    • Like Like x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  20. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,950
    848
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    [​IMG]
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 4
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1