Anybody can tell an informant known to the Government anything they want. Steve Sprurrier took bribes to lose games to Bobby Bowden. This is especially worthless when like Biden case it is one guy supposedly told another guy about bribes and he then told the informant. Don't report this until Biden is for sure the Democratic nominee in June 2020. This is no more reliable than football recruiting rumors. The FBI is obligated to complete the FD-1023 form and so small brained farmers James Comer and Charles Grassley think its evidence.
It will be interesting that is for sure. Perhaps the tapes are just as real as the tape of Trump saying he didn't unclassified the docs. At this point if you give credibility to one set of tapes you need to the other also, because the proof for either appears to be the same for now.
If the DOJ put the tapes in the indictment, then they have the tapes. These are more like the peepee tape - unverified raw intelligence. Seems pretty unlikely that the tapes wouldn't have surfaced already assuming it's true that Rudy was involved in uncovering the existence of the tapes.
One tape being in possession of the DOJ, with transcripts included in the indictment, and one tape only alluded to by an informant are not the same...
It's very likely the Grand Jury heard part of the Trump tapes in order for the DOJ to get an indictment. And why transcripts of the Trump tape were included in the indictment. The Trump tapes exist. Not so sure about the Biden ones.
It's also not beyond the realm of possibility that Biden tapes were heavily edited to the point that they completely lacked credibility. I'm sure that if the Biden tapes actually existed they were reviewed by forensic experts at the FBI to determine their credibility and the experts could have determined that the tapes were edited to the point that they could not be considered reliable. Let's not forget that when the tapes were supposedly provided by the confidential informant Trump was still in office and both the FBI Director and the AG were Trump appointees.
I am not saying this is the case by no means, but all you lefty's jump really quick to give credibility to anything anyone produces that sheds a negative light on anything Trump. In the same breath saying anything negative to Bidumb must lack credibility. Just remember the folks you claim are so worthy of credibility are some of the same folks that gave credibility to the Steel dossier and said the Hunter laptop was Russian disinformation. I just think we need to hear the actual tapes of both before we jump off the ledge of one being reliable and the other not, however that may fall.
To the OP - As a DEMOCRAT, I absolutely support holding any of the Bidens guilty and accountable for breaking the law. There is a burden of proof however and I am still waiting for something solid from your side.
I'm sorry but that's just not the case here. There's one tape we can say exists with a high level of confidence and one with a low level of certainty because no one in the government has verified it exists and we haven't seen any sort of transcript to give credibility that it exists. Could it be real? Absolutely! But looking at the facts we have now there's just not a comparison. Not every situation can be distilled down to a basic conclusion to make a comparison (both Biden and Trump had classified docs!). Circumstances and nuance matter.
The republicans have been lying again and the OP bought it hook, line and sinker. I suspect he's a kicker and uses Lucy as his holder.
Comer admitted no one has heard from the main confidential source for three (3) years. Someone can take that FD-1023 and wipe their butt with it. Comer admits nobody has heard from alleged Biden informant for three years
Is @1990Gator one of those people that was insisting that the election was stolen? It wouldn't surprise me. When are we going to hear from the whistleblower?