Huh? I think @oragator1 is about as far from the “MAGA types” you are obsessed with. They started the thread.
Your daughter was not competing against legit competition then. Certainly they did not compete for a state championship against boys. LOL!
that's shitty & wrong. to think it just happens to "6" is gross. guessing you aint got kids or empathy for that matter
So now you have qualifiers in your outrage. Yeah when you can’t win the debate just change the parameters. Face it you’re just a post turtle and always will be. Now be a good little boy and run along.
I agree so completely with this that I believe males with Klinefelter syndrome (XXY) should be allowed to compete with women. Low testosterone levels and reduced muscle mass are characteristics of this condition, so the playing field is naturally leveled. If anything, they are at a disadvantage because of altered body proportions and learning difficulties. Women (and girls) should also be allowed to compete with men in situations where they are genuinely competitive, e.g., a small high school where an exceptionally gifted female athlete could compete with boys.
That maybe the most ridiculous defense of this crap I have heard yet. And while track is very athletic it’s not a super masculine sport.
It's an extremely low number. How many kids are killed with guns and we can't even start THAT conversation. How many women trans athletes are there? I don't know. But the number is so small that this just seems like phony outrage right now. Yes, it sucks and I support a 3rd grouping. The right is trying to find their equivalent of abortion right now. CRT. Disney. Immigrants. Trans. The equivalent is GUNS. Has anyone come for your guns lately? No. The base will gobble up whatever it is fed. The problem is the middle. What moves the middle's needle. Abortion is one for sure. I bet the 2A is also one but it's never been in jeopardy.
So now an individuals rights matter more if there are more people affected? If that was the case the rights of the biological women would win hands down over the rights of the non biological “women”. And it wasn’t a back handed insult. It was straight up calling out those that scream about women’s right’s (unless very few women are affected according to your “logic”). As for your last comment define pro choice…
I claimed it is an issue. Again, please follow along, right now, today; this just doesn't move the needle like you want it to. I agree it is unfair. You dodged the gist of my post. I feel like the right is searching for it's social equivalent of abortion that would activate voters and maybe pull in some moderates. The same people you would need to side with you on this issue, to make a difference at the polls, are the same people that are going to vote on abortion this cycle. It doesn't make it not an issue or not important but it's time is not there yet. Your fake accusations don't help. They make you look desperate. Especially, that extra jab at her not caring about women's rights. That was unnecessary and frankly just plain horse manure.