Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Lock him up! CNN reports Trump to be indicted

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by WarDamnGator, Jun 8, 2023.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,703
    5,387
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
  2. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    9,290
    1,793
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    Huh? From the formally titled leader, who quite literally “speaks” for the GOP:

    McCarthy even goes next level scum by claiming Joe Biden directs DOJ indictments. MAGAniacs all over the country just got even twitchier.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    14,362
    22,654
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Sadly, for our country, I believe this will turn violent before all is said and done.

    Still, it is the constitutionally correct and moral thing to do.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  4. mikemcd810

    mikemcd810 Premium Member

    1,957
    436
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    Add Bill Barr to the list of people who think this is trouble for Trump

     
    • Like Like x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  5. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,262
    2,090
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Said it before, but if our country falls apart because of Trump, we deserved it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  6. Tjgators

    Tjgators Premium Member

    5,120
    641
    358
    Apr 3, 2007
    There is a big difference between asking for a classified document return, and asking for a return of documents that contain “classified markings. Do you know that Trump and his legal team did not return all classified documents? You don't.

    If Biden classified those documents himself he is off the hook. If he did not then the waters are muddy. The USA Today rag is wrong.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,814
    808
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    The indictment lists 30+ documents that were not returned upon subpoena. Hence the illegal retention of national security information changes.

    Or am I missing something?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,260
    2,098
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yes, we actually do. Read the indictment. Heck, listen to Trump's own words, where he admits that he didn't declassify something that he is showing to a person without clearance.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,516
    12,180
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    We do lnow that he hasnt returned multiple documents with the Iran invasion plans neing one of them
     
  10. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    And in fact that document is still missing IIRC correctly. Any guesses as to where it is?
     
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,516
    12,180
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Clay Higgins...know your bridges

    Now tanker fire under bridge in Philly has collapsed a bridge on I95 and shut down the interstate

    Breaking: Truck fire causes I-95 collapse in Northeast Philadelphia – NBC10 Philadelphia

    A truck fire burning under an I-95 on-ramp has caused a part of the roadway to collapse and the highway to be closed to traffic by officials early Sunday.
    NBC's Randy Gyllenhaal reported that officials on scene said they’re investigating after the northbound side on I-95 collapsed before 8 a.m. and the southbound side is "compromised."
    Gyllenhaal said that officials told him, "the roadway is gone."
     
  12. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,955
    848
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Well, I've said my piece.

    As long as ya'll know that pretty much everything you've said supporting this indictment can be thrown right back in your face when any Democrat is indicted (provided that there's evidence of criminal activity), and you can live with the consequences, so be it.

    But somehow I have the feeling that the next Democratic favorite to be indicted will spark tons of outrage from you guys, regardless of the evidence against him. You will be shouting "banana republic" just like we are now.

    And based on Trump's stupidity, I really don't want this to happen. I don't want Trump to be the guy that causes this, but it's hard for me to look at this forum and see people who not only support this indictment but the New York indictment and a potential kidnapping indictment against DeSantis, and think you guys didn't bring this on yourselves.

    You've been looking to get these guys for as long as you've perceived them as a political threat. Don't get mad when the same sort of relentless pursuit is directed back at one of your boys. And when any of these guys are under a microscope for everything for 7 years, you'll find something.

    What I hope happens: Trump drops out of the race/doesn't get elected, has all security clearance revoked, has all of his sensitive documents revoked, gets pardoned, and the next President strongly discourages any retaliatory prosecutions from anywhere in the country. We need to move on. But frankly, it's going to be very difficult to put this genie back in the bottle.

    Feels like we're on the Highway to Hell.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  13. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,514
    1,800
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Cute, the only problem is that the situations of Clinton and Trump are in no way analogous. None of the allegations against Trump concern the Presidential Records Act. They concern the Espionage Act and obstruction of justice.
    https://www.washingtonpost.com/dc-md-va/2023/06/09/trump-charges-classified-documents/
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  14. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,814
    808
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    Thank god!
     
    • Funny Funny x 4
    • Agree Agree x 2
  15. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,851
    1,420
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
  16. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    It seems like you’re just ignoring 90% of the indictment. Forget, just for the moment, that Trump admitted in a taped interview THAT HE THOUGHT THE DOCUMENTS WERE CLASSIFIED AND NOT DE-CLASSIFIED. How do you excuse:

    1. His conduct when the Government requested he return the documents;
    2. His subterfuge during the period where he said he was cooperating;
    3. His instructions to his staff to move and hide the documents;
    4. His instructions to his counsel to lie about whether he had the documents;
    5. His actual lies under oath to the government in the certification that he returned the documents;
    6. The recklessness in storing the maintenance in insecure places, spread out all over the rooms (because boxes fell or, heaven forbid, were otherwise broken into and photographed by sinister agents);
    7. His obstruction of a grand jury subpoena;
    8. He still refused to return the confidential documents even after being subpoenaed and after being told more documents remain, requiring a first-in-class FBI enforcement of the grand jury subpoena for documents which he said didn’t exist; and
    9. All of this after hotly campaigning to punish those who recklessly handle confidential and sensitive government information?

    At what point, in your objective mind, is enough, well, enough? What is your view, given all of the above, of how the government, IN CHARGE OF OUR SAFETY AND PROTECTION, was supposed to ensure the protection of the documents? What should be done when someone flat out refuses to comply with the law, after multiple chances?

    I am really interested in hearing your view of what should be done, forgetting all of the “whataboutism” deflections about Hilary and everyone else. What should be done ABOUT TRUMP, given the foregoing?
     
    • Winner x 2
    • Optimistic x 2
    • Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Best Post Ever x 1
  17. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Who is embarrassing us on the World Stage? A former President that literally snubbed his nose at the law, or the government that said nobody is above the law?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  18. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    We don’t need to haggle over whether he did or could de-classify them. We have him in tape admitting THEY WERE NOT DECLASSIFIED, while also admitting HE COULD HAVE DECLASSIFIED THEM BUT DIDN’T. There’s no question whether the documents remained classified AS A MATTER OF FACT.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  19. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    Wait … are you making your arguments without having read the indictment? If so, take a quick trip to the internet where you will find the indictment fully published for anyone to read cover to cover. Please do so, it will really help you explain some of the responses to the arguments.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  20. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    And, assume this is correct. What does the ruling say about a person lying during the investigation, obstructing an investigation, and openly and mishandling confidential and sensitive information?