Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

PGA vs LIV **Updated to discuss merger**

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8trGr8t, Feb 17, 2023.

  1. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    I think a couple of bone saws were rattled around. The PGA boss is a total scum bag. Look at what he said about 9/11 families and LIV just a few months ago. He got FU money and he gets to live.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. littlebluelw

    littlebluelw GC Hall of Fame

    6,334
    825
    2,068
    Apr 3, 2007
    I watched/listened to entirely too much coverage of this today. The real story (if it comes out) should be interesting.
    If I’d been a player in that meeting with the commissioner today let’s just say he’d know exactly what I think.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. obgator

    obgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,803
    1,346
    2,103
    Apr 3, 2007
    upload_2023-6-6_16-36-9.jpeg
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,427
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    KSA bought the PGA. I really hope pro golf craters and players step out and form their own league independent of KSA
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,947
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    The players were not happy (unsurprisingly). Supposedly like 90-10 ratio being pissed about the agreement.

    I wonder if there’s a chance they could skuttle the deal? Esp if the commish did it in secret without even having the blessing of the players? When the news first broke I assumed at least a top committee of players must have been on board and aware and the $$$ talked. But it sounds more and more like Monahan did this on his own. Definite POS move.

    If it goes through and players see bigger purses, at the end of the day it will smooth out somewhat. But with the immediate blowback you wonder if the players could try to skuttle the deal. I mean guy literally just sold out their non-profit PGA tour entity to a for-profit global entity 100% owned by the Saudi’s. But it wasn’t his to personally sell.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,248
    1,906
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Saudi Arabia understands American values, i.e. shameless greed
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    32,427
    12,163
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Hopefully Tiger and some others start their own tour, the advertisers go with them, and prominent clubs refuse to host LIV events.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. gatrpe

    gatrpe Premium Member

    3,578
    1,076
    2,028
    Apr 3, 2007
    Lake Mary, Florida
    I thought the same. At least the player advisory board members and posted same on the board thread that was locked. I was wrong. How none of the players were aware of this is unbelievable and if I were a PGA player, unforgivable.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,238
    2,077
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    That's what I was about to say. None of the PGA guys are under contract. They could immediately do the same thing LIV just did and start their own tour. As long as Tiger is involved, even as just the face, it would succeed. That would be hilarious if it happened.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  10. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,290
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    I also don't understand this. In Court filings, the Tour describes itself as a membership organization that exists to benefit its members by allowing them to collectively bargain with sponsors, tournament organizers, etc.

    How can an organization like that be sold without even telling the members? What's doubly strange is in his messaging to players, Monahan isn't even promising bigger purses. You would think that his first priority would be explaining to the membership how this move helps them. Yet that's not even worth a mention, apparently. Who the heck is this guy responsible to?
     
  11. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,947
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    I’d love to see it, but the PGA tour is a powerful brand. That was why LIV efforts were probably futile long term (or would take literally years and years of the Saudi’s pouring $$$ into just straight up buying players). They were going up against an established brand with established tournaments, established sponsorships, etc. Nobody was watching the joke LIV tournaments.

    If the Saudi’s have control over the PGA brand, then the tables would be turned and it would be the other players with the uphill climb going up against the established tour. Unless they can wrestle back that PGA tour branding somehow, or some of the bigger tournaments shift affiliations to your hypothetical new tour.
     
  12. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,238
    2,077
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Except for Tiger. Tiger is a bigger brand than the PGA tour. Even as a non-player he'd still be the biggest mover of the needle in anything like this. Sponsors would trip over themselves to get involved in something Tiger is pushing. Nike could probably do it by itself if it wanted.

    I don't think this is really going to happen. Theyre going to have to figure out a way to back door compensate the big name guys who stuck around the PGA tour and just got hosed. Otherwise they're going to have some serious issues, imo.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,947
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Nike has its own history of human rights abuses in Chinese factories.

    Not as crazy as being literally owned by the Saudi government, but there would be some obvious hypocrisy from a “Nike tour” on the basis of pushing back against human rights concerns.
     
  14. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,238
    2,077
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    For sure. Although Saudi is surface level "This is dirty money" whereas Nike is a little bit more of a deep cut. But either way, I'm curious how this all unfolds. It's one of the most interesting sports stories in a long time.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. scbeerman

    scbeerman VIP Member

    1,761
    331
    1,743
    Apr 3, 2007
    Agree on interesting story.

    It is too soon for me to evaluate it. I have heard that the PGA Tour was fearful it would lose antitrust status. I also read that the increased money they ponied up this season has put them in a precarious financial position. Who knows what is true? As least the four majors are separate from this organization so they will always exist (and may increase in importance).
     
  16. gatrpe

    gatrpe Premium Member

    3,578
    1,076
    2,028
    Apr 3, 2007
    Lake Mary, Florida
    It has to be a huge issue that threatens the PGA for leadership to go down this path without the knowledge and consent of the players or even key players. So you are probably right. The end result is they went for the safety of financial backing.
     
  17. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,238
    2,077
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    It seems to me by eliminating it's competition the PGA would open itself up to more anti-trust issues. But I'm no expert.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise Hurricane Hunter

    15,745
    26,028
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    • Informative Informative x 1