Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Senate votes to kill $400 billion student loan handout, sets up fifth Biden veto

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by flgator2, Jun 1, 2023.

  1. flgator2

    flgator2 GC Hall of Fame

    6,795
    696
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    Gainesville
    Senate votes to kill $400 billion student loan handout, sets up fifth Biden veto | Fox News

    In a 52-46 vote, the Senate passed a resolution disapproving of the Department of Education rule implementing Biden's plan. The vote was successful thanks to Sens. Joe Manchin, D-W.Va., Jon Tester, D-Mont., and Kyrsten Sinema, I-Ariz., who voted with all 49 Republicans to scrap the loan bailout.

    The Senate vote followed last week’s 218-203 vote in the House to kill the program that Republicans have said is unfair to Americans who either never took out student loans or paid them off.

    "It’s deeply unfair to ask the many Americans who worked hard to pay off their loans or who never pursued college in the first place to take on the burden of student debt for individuals who took out loans for college or graduate school and agreed to pay them back," he said.

    Democrats voted overwhelmingly against the resolution and argued that Republican efforts to kill the program would hurt millions of Americans who have already qualified for debt relief.

    Finally, some good news
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. exiledgator

    exiledgator Gruntled

    11,237
    2,002
    3,128
    Jan 5, 2010
    Maine
    I don't know the specific of this bill, but I'm against student loan forgiveness on its face. It does nothing to address the core issues that created the debt to begin with.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 3
  3. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,248
    1,906
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Its going to be decided by the courts anyways, like literally everything else in this stupid country
     
  4. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,744
    1,644
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    It does seem to be the case often, but i wonder who would be better to decide it?
     
  5. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,248
    1,906
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    I don't know, maybe someone who people actually elected to make decisions?
     
  6. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,744
    1,644
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Biden? McCarthy? DeSantis? AOC? All of them?
     
  7. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,248
    1,906
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    In this case Biden, he simply used a law that allowed him to do what he did, a law that granted him pretty broad emergency powers which don't seem in dispute. And to be honest, the idea that the people suing over his have any standing is pretty dubious. Seems like a case of throwing some shit against the wall hoping it sticks because you didnt like what happened. We just happen to have courts that are willing to give anyone standing, whether its to block this or try to ban a drug thats had FDA approval for 20 years.
     
  8. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,744
    1,644
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    Im not well versed on the specifics of this case, but clearly there has to be a limit to what qualifies as a legitimate of emergency powers by a president. And this limit must be determined by a body other than the president himself, or else there effectively is no limit.

    I’m not saying that this move shouldn’t be permitted. Again I have no idea, but even if we decide that this is a permissible use of that power, such a decision would seem to imply that it would be permissible for the next president to single handedly revoke this decision based on his/her powers. I think I understand why you don’t want courts to be able to weigh in on these decisions, but leaving it entirely in the hands of whomever happens to be president at that moment is troublesome as well.
     
  9. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    3,748
    981
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    what’s the emergency ?
     
  10. ridgetop

    ridgetop GC Hall of Fame

    2,098
    732
    1,848
    Aug 4, 2020
    Top of the ridge
    Come on dude
    CoVid is always the go to boogeyman emergency. It will be for at least the next decade.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  11. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    I’m generally against paying off someone else’s debts but it’s up to the older generation to make the path easier for future generations to follow. My boomer generation has failed miserably at that, and it’s sad that the President’s efforts at changing that are being obstructed.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  12. ATLGATORFAN

    ATLGATORFAN Premium Member

    3,748
    981
    2,153
    Aug 10, 2015
    another way to consider it…. It’s up to the younger generation to learn from the older and not repeat similar mistakes. Just my opinion but Paying off someone else’s grad degree doesn’t move the needle on learning from prior mistakes. More accurate description would be enable
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,717
    932
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    Except that technically no one is paying off the debt. It is being erased from the books. I think that’s a more honest discussion.

    Folks that have paid back the amount of the principal plus a reasonable amount of interest deserve an honest discussion of the issue. My opinion only.
     
  14. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes but it’s not their fault the cost of an education has skyrocketed, or that the lending agencies were so willing to give money to a poor risk. Besides why should the government be making a profit on these loans?
     
  15. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    9,170
    2,146
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    That can’t be your understanding of this issue. You understand that the money involved came from somewhere, right? It didn’t just manifest from the aether. Banks loan out that money, and it’s guaranteed by the federal government, which means the banks don’t have to bother with normal procedures, such as checking credit scores, collateral, co-signers, and such. Everyone just qualifies, providing they are legitimately in school and — this is key — give their word they will pay it back. When they default (and this is what we are talking about, a massive default), the federal government pays off the loan with tax money. So it’s real money. Not just the erasure of some phantom numbers.

    But that isn’t even the disturbing part of this proposition. Let’s just say the premise is correct, that education has gotten too expensive and the burden of these loans outweighs the benefits of the education received. I don’t fully buy into that for several reasons, but let’s just accept it. How does a mass forgiveness of loans solve the original problem? Will education magically get cheaper after this, so no one will need to borrow anymore money? I assess it will get more expensive once people hazardously just crank up the borrowing even more under the assumption that — Meh! — it will just be forgiven by the next round of vote buyers.

    Now if this was part of an overall reform of federal education assistance that did away with future grants and guaranteed loans, replacing them with, say, merit-based scholarships in exchange for a term of government service upon graduation, then I would be on board. Otherwise, the moral and fiscal hazard here is enormous even before one takes into account the basic fairness of it.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  16. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,308
    5,990
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    Someone decides to get a liberal arts degree with no job prospects at a 70k a year private school when they could have gone to a public, and we are supposed to eat that cost? Or more to the point, the school is incentivized to keep that crazy behavior up?

    No thanks.

    but Biden will veto it and they don't have the votes to override, so this is largely theater.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  17. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    9,236
    2,077
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Same reason I didn't like the ACA either. This country is really good at trying to patchwork together some half measures on an issue, but never really actually solve the underlying problem.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  18. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    12,031
    2,628
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    I’ve stated I am not for this but not for the lame reasons above. I just think there are better uses of the money for other groups that the republicans would also oppose.

    Ideologically though the Government markup on education is pretty high… I think a rebate like you get at Kohls or Tesla is just fine.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I am not sure where I fall on this debate, but the fairness argument seems silly.

    Many people who "never chose college or paid off their own college loans" now have kids of their own in college. I for one would not scream "unfair" if my daughters loan debt suddenly vanished. ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Or just cut the margin in the first place.