Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Also: a stitch in time saves nine.

 

If you have a 1 in 10,000 chance of dying your individual odds are near zero and very good that you'll be fine.

If a shot can take you to a 1 in 100,000 chance of dying that's much better even if you individually were not at significant risk initially.

Now imagine you're making public health recommendations for millions of people. 1 in 10,000 is a lot of (preventable) deaths on that scale!

 

The only truly effective vaccine is a rejection of belief in contagion. It eliminates viruses AND vaccine harms.

 

So now we have the CDC Director lying to Congress. We knew this wasn't true back then yet the grift continues. If only the CDC wasn't so partisan.

 

Looking back over the months, no, years … it is stupefying how gullible people were. A deadly disease emerged in which people without symptoms could kill other people ? According to another thread mankind is supposed to have become so sophisticated that it no longer needs God.

 

A cult. Purely a cult …

The widower of a BBC presenter who died from coronavirus vaccine complications says he was jabbed two times after his wife died - but he won't get their eight-year-old son vaccinated.


BBC presenter's widower suing AstraZeneca was vaccinated after her death but won't let son be jabbed | Daily Mail Online

 

I've know about this for over 2 years and I've been saying it here for almost that amount of time too.



NIH records show feds funded research in China to create coronavirus 'mutants'

Conservative watchdog group Judicial Watch on Wednesday announced it had received records from the Department of Health and Human Services showing that the National Institutes of Health granting funding for experiments at the Wuhan Institute of Virology that sought to create mutant coronavirus variants.

Included in the documents were the initial grant application from EcoHealth Alliance and its annual reports. Those documents described work with the WIV as seeking to "predict the capacity of our CoVs [coronaviruses] to infect people."

Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton indicated that the documents supported the idea that U.S. funding for coronavirus research may have directly contributed to the COVID-19 pandemic.


NIH records show feds funded research in China to create coronavirus 'mutants'


--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

And here is what EcoHealth Alliance is doing in all this. These insidious NGO's have to be abolished. All do if funnel tax payer's money from the dirt politicians in congress to special interest groups of their choosing and their political leanings to further their won personal agendas. It's a crooked way to siphon tax revenue for their pet projects with little to no oversight.

I knew China was behind this and that Fauci himself admitted on camera that the NIH funded gain of function research in Wuhan on the bat virus that lead to the corona virus, covid-19.



Who is Peter Daszak, the nonprofit exec who sent taxpayer money to Wuhan lab?


The nonprofit exec whose organization sent nearly $600,000 in US taxpayer money to a Chinese lab that may have been the source of COVID-19 masterminded an effort near the start of the pandemic to squelch the notion that the coronavirus was man-made, a new report reveals.

Peter Daszak, president of the New York City-based EcoHealth Alliance, secretly organized a statement issued by the influential British medical journal The Lancet in February 2020, according to Vanity Fair.

Daszak received more than $410,000 in annual compensation from EcoHealth and “related organizations” during the fiscal year that ended on June 30, 2019, according to an IRS filing posted online by the ProPublica new organization.

The nonprofit, which says it’s “dedicated to protecting wildlife and public health from the emergency of disease,” has received as much as $15 million a year in grant money from various federal agencies, Vanity Fair said..

According to Fauci’s official emails, which were posted online this week by BuzzFeed, Daszak wrote him on April 18, 2020, to express gratitude for Fauci’s public statements backing the theory that the coronavirus evolved naturally.


Who is Peter Daszak, exec who sent taxpayer money to Wuhan lab?

 

Now imagine you look at the data and realize the chances of dying in your age group is 1 in a million. And a new drug with no long term safety profile is available. In fact it has a safety signal for the group that is at almost no risk. There is no way this shot gets EUA if proper medicine and public health decisions are being made.

If only we could imagine public health officials doing their job properly instead of equating a young healthy person to a high risk elderly person with comorbidities.

 

She should be fired. And looked at for possible criminal charges. Unfortunately we have likely protected some of the worst people out there through this…

 

Well, if the data says that with the new drug, the chances drop to 1 in 1.5 million, then you are still talking about saving thousands of lives. And it's worth it!

As for no long term safety profile, mRNA vaccines were tested in mice in the 1990s, and human tests were conducted in 2013. The only difference between the tested mRNA vaccines in 2013 and the ones brought to market in 2020 is the mRNA strand. All other ingredients were the same, and the only thing the mRNA strand is designed to do is spark the immune response. In addition, the entire vaccine is known to break down and leave the body within 12 hours of being jabbed. The chances of long term health risks from a vaccine that has no trace in the body after 12 hours is so low, it's negligible.

We also now have 5.5 billion jabs of data to base our opinion on. And again, there is no correlation between the vaccine and excess deaths. NONE! If there is no correlation, there can be no causation. But what we do see in countries with high vaccination rates is non-COVID death rates between the vaccinated and unvaccinated are about equal. But COVID deaths rates are much higher with the vaccinated.

If you are public health official and you see this data, what do you do? Do you save lives? Or do something stupid like say a bunch of buzz words like safety signals and no long term safety study, and allow more people to die from COVID?

 

These shots would have never been authorized outside the massive fear campaign by the idiots in public health and Big Pharma...

 

Only if you ignore all the data that has come out. Or don't understand data science. Or are an idiot conspiracy theorist. Mortality rate is lower for all age cohorts who have been vaccinated versus those unvaccinated. And zero correlation between the vaccine and excess deaths. Any public health professional looking at the numbers would absolutely recommend a vaccine that saves lives and has an extremely low risk of side effects, and zero risk of excess deaths. The figures don't lie.

 

Just dropping in to point out that it wasn’t terribly long ago that doctors prescribed cigarettes for asthma and butter for burns.

 

Wrong every single time you post it.

 

You can’t possibly be harmed by a vaccine. They literally won’t allow it. They’ll trot out an exotic unnamed virus if they need to …

 

These shots would have never and should have never been authorized for young healthy people. Yet here we are still pushing them on healthy people. Might be the only country left in the world that is this stupid. Granted the vast majority of the population is not listening to the idiotic guidance that you continue to support.

 

Again, facts escape you. Almost all countries have approved the vaccine for those 12 and older. Many of them have also approved the vaccine for 5 - 11 (or younger), including the Czech Republic, Israel, China, and Costa Rica. In the Netherlands, about 63% of all kids ages 12 - 17 are fully vaccinated.

I'm guided by the data. So are the medical professionals in all these countries. The figures don't lie. The vaccine saves lives and there are no long term safety signals that say the vaccine is dangerous, as there is no correlation between vaccination rates and excess deaths in any country on the planet. The idiotic guidance is coming from those who believe otherwise, despite having no data whatsoever to support their opinion. Public health decisions should be based on observations and data. And the figures don't lie, but liars figure.

 

I agree, and only sick demented person would laugh at this. Who takes experimental drugs that have no efficacy information on it. And who has the right to force this experimental drug upon the general population.

 

Yep... all part of the plandemic.

 

Unless the "vaccine" is NOT really a vaccine at all.