Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

100 year old woman provides a dose of reality on book bannings

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by jjgator55, Mar 25, 2023.

  1. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Last edited: May 9, 2023
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    88,956
    26,796
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    So we can expect all Dr. Seuss books back on the shelves as they were originally written?
     
    • Funny Funny x 8
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  3. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    10,111
    2,472
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Let me acknowledge that the controversy over some of the character stereotypes in the books of Dr. Seuss were ridiculous.

    Now that we have that out of the way, is it possible for you to dispense with snide comments and opine on the lady's concerns?
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,359
    2,700
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Dr. Seuss? Really? That's the best you have on her comments? You wonder why no one takes your posts seriously?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 2
  5. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,307
    5,990
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    I don’t care whether you disagree with her 100 percent. Anyone who doesn’t agree that woman is a badass is lyin.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    He’s not wrong, and neither are you. This isn’t a zero sum conversation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. Gatorrick22

    Gatorrick22 GC Hall of Fame

    88,956
    26,796
    4,613
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  8. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    1,858
    784
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    1,858
    784
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Correction. You blew off the comment after seeing you had no intelligent response to it, so you attacked the source. Even then you had no response to its' veracity. Be better.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    No I stand by what I posted.

    His post was without merit and was intellectually lazy, and gives the impression the poster lacks even the basic skills to make basic estimations of motives that might reveal glaringly obvious biases.

    To respond, whether the response be intelligent or flippant, gives credibility to the source which I’m unwilling to give. Not everyone chooses to tiptoe through the cesspool of bias and falsehoods, and no one needs to lower themselves by responding to silliness just to satisfy those of you who think they should. Just take care of yourself, okay?
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  12. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    1,858
    784
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Noted. I fired off on the response since I prefer a described rebuttal rather than the flippant-- likely more than the poster and the source actually deserves. I do understand frustration from the incessant postings of misinformation often quoted.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  13. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    All you need to do there is convince the party that owns the publishing (Seuss’s family) to allow it …
     
  14. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    3,928
    3,601
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    Does anyone else see the correlation between the tearing down of confederate statues / flags and the removal of movies or books from schools?
    Now, those on one side will say "I have the moral high ground, that form of censorship is ok".
    But here is the problem, If one person or group says I'm troubled and offended by Dr. Suess or a confederate statue because it makes me feel bad, then someone else who doesn't want their kid to see Ruby Bridges or learn about Rosa Parks truthfully in school because it makes it seem like all white people hate black people, then you get the type of climate we are in right now. And the back and forth is only going to get worse.
    If everyone is cool with that, then great!
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  15. HeyItsMe

    HeyItsMe GC Hall of Fame

    1,877
    558
    2,088
    Mar 7, 2009
    I wonder why the usual suspects of “Desantis is so great” have nothing to say about this? She’s as qualified as anyone to know a fascist when she sees it. Interesting.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  16. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,307
    5,990
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think the difference is that a public museum will still have information on Robert E Lee for example. There’s a difference between educating and glorifying.
     
  17. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    3,928
    3,601
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    All I'm saying is people shouldn't be shocked when there's push back for something going the other way. Whether that's Dr. Suess re-writes or mis-representing Rosa Park's impact.
    The biggest issue is that in order for these things to take effect, there have to be people elected or appointed or rising to important positions to get it done, keep that from happening in either direction, and you will start to make things better.
    I remember my history classes in high school and learning about Jim Crow and civil rights (my class ended with the moon landing and barely anything on Vietnam. I don't think the lessons made me feel guilty about anything, nor was it not lost on me that there were vast amounts of harm done to the black community. Why can't we go back and teach that way?
     
  18. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    What makes you think kids aren’t taught that way. There’s a phony movement embellishing minute instances of educational misfeasance and falsely claiming “it’s an epidemic.” My children finished high school just a few years ago, and neither they nor their friends were “groomed” or educated dishonestly.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  19. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    3,928
    3,601
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    I'm quite sure they aren't being taught that way, my kids graduated high school recently and they didn't have an issue either, but once banning something becomes part of a playbook, someone is going to use it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,214
    2,666
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    I think we are in agreement. The entire charade that has devolved into the religious takeover of our schools was unnecessary and based entirely upon a false premise and misleading narrative.

    When the victims of the Bogus Woke War are our children, it’s time to stop the tot-for-tat.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 3