Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Is there a scenario….

Discussion in 'RayGator's Swamp Gas' started by garettk, Mar 10, 2023.

  1. They got destroyed by Colorado that year. 62-36
     
    Last edited: Mar 16, 2023
  2. eightiesgator

    eightiesgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,447
    392
    1,883
    Oct 16, 2017
    Okay. Colorado was a 10-2 team before their bowl game. Auburn was 7-4 before theirs, yet we lost to them, in large part due to Rex's 4 INTs, which tend to stick out in Heisman voter's minds. Voters thought Crouch was more valuable when they voted.
     
  3. AgingGator

    AgingGator GC Hall of Fame

    4,028
    864
    2,088
    Apr 24, 2007
    I always hated playing Auburn up there.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. phideltdj

    phideltdj GC Hall of Fame

    2,429
    384
    1,963
    Aug 7, 2007
    Another game probably won if replay was used...Auburn fumbled the opening kick off and recovered by our kicker but ruled by the officials he was down when replay showed he wasn't. Probably cost us 3 points maybe more. We always got screwed by officiating at Auburn all the time.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. 2oldgator

    2oldgator GC Hall of Fame

    1,246
    898
    1,848
    Jul 14, 2021
    Dunnellon fl
    Auburn is a tough place to play. Only been there once and it was our only loss that season (2006).
     
  6. kryptonite

    kryptonite GC Hall of Fame

    3,489
    1,358
    2,118
    Dec 12, 2008
    I am very hopeful we will not have to worry about that scenario. I noticed in the game replays that Wisconsin was very poor at the running attack. They were in a lot of 3rd and longs where Mertz had a lot of pressure to make something happen. They were behind in lot of games from the get go. He had a lot of interceptions that were receiver problems. At times the receivers looked good at catching difficult balls (where only they could catch them), but then when they had to go get a ball because Mertz got hurried or couldn't follow through, the receivers didn't track the ball, return to the ball and high point. He also had a fair amount of problems with receivers on what I presume were option routes or just wrong routes. He would throw a perfect ball for a curl and the receiver did an out, either of which would have worked. He made so many right choices and good reads throughout the games you would expect most of those were receiver issues, not his. What I would worry about in his bad tendencies were his not stepping into the pocket when pressure came from the edge, which will be much worse of an issue in the SEC. I saw at least one of those that turned into an interception, and his lack of feel for pressure was worse against the better teams. He also didn't keep his eyes down the field because of feeling pressure and losing the chance for a TD or throwing too late. He also loves some routes that make him miss some big plays too. The positives are he is very accurate, can put it where only the receiver can get it, can make all the throws, can run, and reads the defenses very well. The whole playbook will be available to him, which will be a relief from the plays that we rarely saw last year because of some of AR's deficiencies.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  7. Wanne15

    Wanne15 GC Hall of Fame

    18,342
    4,663
    3,088
    Jan 18, 2015
    Crouch sucks
     
    • Funny Funny x 1