Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Silicon Valley Bank

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by oragator1, Mar 10, 2023.

  1. gtr2x

    gtr2x GC Hall of Fame

    16,639
    1,535
    1,393
    Aug 21, 2007
    Don't know what credit cards u reference, but the average consumer's credit card rate was not even close to 5 % prior to the Fed starting rate increases , more like 14-15%.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  2. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    You know that he is not being accused of having money in the bank, right?

    I realize that it looks like he broke the law, and I am not disputing that, but can we at least keep straight what he actually did or did not do to get into trouble?

    Gavin Newsom's ties to Silicon Valley Bank raise questions
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  3. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,306
    5,985
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not to mention, if you have to worry about what the rate is on your CC, you likely have bigger problems. Carrying credit card debt is just not a good fiscal thing to do unless you are left with no choice.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    Even if Thiel did start the bank run, wasn't he really the one person doing what he is obligated to do here? His fund started experiencing problems with transfers into SVB. He looked into it and became alarmed enoough withdrawl all of his Fund's money. He then warned all of the start ups that his VC fund works with that something was wrong at SVB and they needed to get their money now.

    I do not know bank rule or laws, but seems to me, he was the only one acting responsibly here, regardless of whether or not that led to a bank run??
     
  5. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,943
    881
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Yes and no.

    It seems his analysis of the bank was correct. Yet, he’s in a pretty unique position, in terms of almost single handedly kicking off an actual bank run. Not many customers of any bank have that ability, he’s essentially an institutional client.

    That being said, unless he had material inside/non-public information there was probably nothing illegal about his call. He acted in his self interest and his concerns proved valid. If he did have non-public info, I suspect that would be a different matter (legally).
     
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2023
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,248
    1,904
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Yeah I'd like to know too. A credit card with 5% interest? Where does one get one of those? Most are like 3 times that!
     
  7. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,306
    5,985
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    Last edited: Mar 15, 2023
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. gtr2x

    gtr2x GC Hall of Fame

    16,639
    1,535
    1,393
    Aug 21, 2007
    Saudi National Bank is the largest shareholder (10%) in credit suisse fwiw.
     
  9. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,306
    5,985
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    And they said they won’t give anymore.
    So the Swiss government has to step in.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. oragator1

    oragator1 Hurricane Hunter Premium Member

    23,306
    5,985
    3,513
    Apr 3, 2007
    And stepmom they did.
    For most banks, when your biggest investor with the most to lose says “no mas” you are done.
    But the Swiss said nein.

     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. gaterzfan

    gaterzfan GC Hall of Fame

    1,892
    384
    1,713
    Feb 6, 2020
    Anyone buying FRC at $35?
     
  12. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,461
    6,326
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    I read the letter from the CEO on Sunday. While I would not take you up on investing in FRC at $35, I do not believe that they are in the same boat as SVB.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  13. gaterzfan

    gaterzfan GC Hall of Fame

    1,892
    384
    1,713
    Feb 6, 2020
    Two charts that show why the carrying value of SVB's long-term treasuries declined in value. The cost of the ridiculously low interest rates over the last 14+ years are now "coming home to roost".

    [​IMG]

    [​IMG]
     
  14. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,832
    1,419
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    Too big to fail is the norm now. If you bank with the big fish, your money is safe. Smaller community banks? Not so much.
     
  15. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,219
    460
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    Beat me to it...damn, this should give everyone the warm fuzzies.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    21,426
    1,780
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Agree. Although maybe some cards offered low promotional teaser rates I don't recall a credit card that ever had a regular interest rate anywhere near 5%. I might add that personally I don't really care about credit card interest rates since I can and do pay my balance in full every month.
     
  17. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,832
    1,419
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    The whole saga is very bizarre and quite scary. So now all of the sudden, the FDIC is going to insure bank deposits up to infinity $$$… as long as you bank at a bank the Feds consider a “systemic risk”. We’re getting into some murky waters. Oh yeah and when the big banks fail, the smaller banks who did it right will be the ones covering the tab.
     
  18. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,219
    460
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
  19. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,905
    829
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    “Anyone who doubted how detrimental Trump administration policies would be should analyze the damage unfolding for those trampled by Silicon Valley Bank’s collapse. On May 24, 2018, Trump signed into law the Economic Growth, Regulatory Relief and Consumer Protection Act (the “Reform Act”). This was a regulatory relief bill for regional and community bill, which bank lobbyists and numerous politicians had fought hard for.

    Thanks to Trump and his supporters this all changed. Some of the key changes that EGRRCPA made were:
    • Increasing the asset threshold for “systemically important financial institutions” or, “SIFIs,” from $50 billion to $250 billion.
    • Immediately exempting bank holding companies with less than $100 billion in assets from enhanced prudential standards imposed on SIFIs under Section 165 of the Dodd-Frank Act (including but not limited to resolution planning and enhanced liquidity and risk management requirements).
    • Exempting bank holding companies with between $100 billion and $250 billion in assets from the enhanced prudential standards.
    • Limiting stress testing conducted by the Federal Reserve to banks and bank holding companies with $100 billion or more in assets.”

    How Trump’s Deregulation Sowed The Seeds For Silicon Valley Bank’s Demise
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1