Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

S Carolina Rep Proposes Death Penalty for Women Who Have Abortions

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by ncargat1, Mar 13, 2023.

  1. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,396
    2,703
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    You just moved the goalposts. The death penalty has most definitely, absolutely been proposed for women getting abortions in South Carolina, no ifs, and or buts, your little word game notwithstanding.

    Yes, without question.

    Happy?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    The problem that’s being raised is that it’s on the table at all.
     
  3. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,854
    1,358
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    If the law passes, could a woman who has a abortion be given the death penalty ... yes or no?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,396
    2,703
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Not just the death penalty, the electric chair or a firing squad.
     
  5. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    The SC rep is in no position to propose the death penalty. The death penalty must be sought subsequent to a guilty verdict and only the court/prosectors may propose the death penalty - not the rep who proposed this bill. If the bill suggested that convictions for the crime will result in the court seeking the death penalty, the title would be accurate, but the bill does not.
    Your point re: "subject to the same laws" is well-taken and I acknowledge (again) that it's ridiculous. My primary concern, though is how folks rudely jumped on @phatGator, when he made a legitimate point.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  6. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 1
  7. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Objection, your honor; irrelevant
     
  8. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Agreed
     
  9. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,396
    2,703
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    pro·pose
    /prəˈpōz/

    verb
    past tense: proposed; past participle: proposed
    1.
    put forward (an idea or plan) for consideration or discussion by others.
    "he proposed a new nine-point peace plan"

    Tell me again what this South Carolina representative did.
     
  10. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Yes. See, that wasn't so hard. Now, to my point, because even in your question you use the word "could"

    Would the thread title be more accurate to read: "S Carolina Rep Proposes that Women Who Have Abortions Could Receive Death Penalty"?

    (Yes)
    The thread title is misleading. Ladies and gentlemen of the jury, I rest my case.
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  11. okeechobee

    okeechobee GC Hall of Fame

    10,835
    1,419
    678
    Sep 11, 2022
    The sad part is most of them probably don’t care. They’re just pandering to their base. (the darker side of their base)
     
  12. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,854
    1,358
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Yeah… I think most people understand the way the legal system works is that not everyone gets the same punishment for the same “crime”. But good for you for finally admitting that the law would allow the state to strap a woman in the electric chair for having an abortion… seems dumb… huh?
     
  13. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,948
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    This still is a far cry from “misleading”. It’s missing a word that would make it better, i guess. This is picking nits.

    The most neutral possible headline would probably be something like: “GOP SC legislature proposes to treat abortion as homicide”, but then that undersells it unless the reader digs deeper. 30years prison up to death penalty. Using death penalty in the headline gets it across immediately, then the article expands more fully as it should. Hell even the way the SC legislature words their current homicide statute puts death penalty first, as if that is the default, and 30 year minimum is just an acceptable floor. In practice putting people to death is hard, and that’s why relatively low % of cases go that route. But that isn’t for want of trying! Red states are also actively trying to cut red tape on death sentences. Including our own illustrious Governor trying to get them done without a unanimous jury. What’s next? No appeals? Hell let’s just skip trials and get right to it.
     
    Last edited: Mar 14, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 1
  14. GatorJMDZ

    GatorJMDZ gatorjack VIP Member

    25,396
    2,703
    1,868
    Apr 3, 2007
    Uhmm, no. You rest your case to the judge at the close of the evidence, not to a jury after closing arguments.
     
  15. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    32,373
    55,066
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Thank you your excellency
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  16. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,580
    13,303
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Even if you take the death penalty off the table, do we really want to charge those who seek abortions with murder? I realize that is a wet dream of the small government evangelical neo fascists, but seriously?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    You’re just hanging on to legalese. It’s a bad look. You should cut it out.

    These are soulless ghouls who do not belong on planet earth. No need for equivocation.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Totally agree. It’s discouraging to see how far people (politicians) will go to pander to their base. I guess if you want to get elected that’s what you need to do. That’s what people want. The result is to be a successful politician these days you have to be a sociopath.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    13,024
    1,742
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    This really seems like you are going out of your way to equivocate, minimize and rationalize. We all agree what they are proposing is to make abortion murder, including sentencing that comes with murder - which quite notably includes the death penalty. So if you are willing to charge women who have abortions with murder, it’s only logical that the death penalty is considered an appropriate sentence.
     
  20. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,580
    13,303
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Therein lies the rub. It's not just one gop politician, or even 21, there is a significant portion of the gop base they are pandering to that laps this shit up like pablum.