Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Florida Department of Education rejects AP African American Studies course

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by G8tas, Jan 19, 2023.

  1. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,005
    1,434
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    It is clear a majority of people want the garbage out of education. Hence the AP course is removing it now and going to send it back for approval. The state of Florida is not trying to remove African American History. And DeSantis will win this issue like he did the Parental Rights issue. The bigger issue that is ignorantly made about this…the bigger the win for DeSantis will be.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    15,787
    5,476
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Even if the majority do agree, the majority in Florida, Alabama, Georgia, Mississippi, South Carolina, etc. agreed with segregation 60 years ago. I couldn't give a rat's ass what a bunch of bigots think, even if they are in the majority here.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,005
    1,434
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Typical response from a petulant child. Ignorant name calling.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,329
    1,288
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Does you calling him a “petulant child” qualify as ignorant name calling?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,005
    1,434
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Ignorantly calling a large group of people you disagree with “bigots” is exactly what a petulant child would do. It is calling a spade a spade.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Ignorantly calling people you disagree with a petulant child is exactly what a petulant child would do. Just calling a spade a spade here.

    See the issue here?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  7. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,622
    908
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    FYI, the final pilot framework for this course will be released on February 1.
     
    • Informative Informative x 3
  8. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,564
    956
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    Right. Same for Biden, too, I'm sure.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,005
    1,434
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    No issue to see here other than your ignorance and thinking you did something…
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  10. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,442
    1,967
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Of course, a petulant child would think that their name calling was okay but others calling people a name makes them petulant children. Petulant children that think like that have no capacity for self-reflection.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    15,787
    5,476
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    • Informative Informative x 2
  12. PetrolGator

    PetrolGator Lawful Neutral Premium Member

    364
    162
    1,978
    Dec 8, 2008
    Herndon, Virginia
    This all reminds me of when the state of Oklahoma refused to include any mentions of the Tulsa Race Massacre in their curriculum as to not make white kids feel guilty. It blows my mind that I had to learn of one of the most abhorrent events in my home state from a freaking HBO superhero show. Oklahoma teachers didn't even have instructions to include the event until 2002, when introduction was sketchy, at best. Thankfully for young, fragile minds, Governor Kevin Stitt just signed a similar DeSantis law that bars topics that force students "feel discomfort, guilt, anguish or any other form of psychological distress" because of their race or gender. Some schools are already removing mention of the 1921 event from their lesson plans for fear of reprisal.

    Also:

    1) I'm not sure lawmakers are considering the precedent created here or potential objections to almost anything taught in schools by this definition. Christian Scientist? Well, learning viruses and bacteria cause disease is a no-no.

    2) Learning about horrible events in history is a method we utilize to keep it from happening again.

    3) Education isn't designed to keep you comfortable. Learning is difficult and coddling people because reality can suck does them no service. Understanding the United States' history, both the good and bad, makes us a better nation. The irony of the far right calling others "snowflakes" while pushing this legislation is not so amusingly ironic.

    Oh. We also did a "land run" in elementary school on a large back tract of land. Several parents of Indigenous kids objected much to the mockery of most of the rest of PTA. Mind you, we were taught that the Oklahoma land grab was this swell event where the United States finally "civilized" the former territory. The practice didn't end until the early 2000's.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    I'd be interested to see what is in it. Also, babe, does this AP course replace a history credit, or would it specifically replace an African American history credit, should the student pass the exam?
     
  14. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,622
    908
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    Actually, I believe it would count as social studies elective at the high school level as it’s not really a history class. I assume that it would also count as an elective credit at the university level.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  15. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
     
    • Like Like x 1
  17. Swamplizard

    Swamplizard VIP Member

    3,928
    735
    1,833
    Apr 3, 2007
    Orlando, Florida

    Here is the original course I think I read somewhere that the sticking points were all in Unit 4

    https://s3.documentcloud.org/documents/23584340/ap-afam-syllabus-watermark.pdf


    Here is also what courses in African American History are required or not allowed per the State of Florida


    African American History
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  18. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,622
    908
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    Again, the final framework will not be out until 2/1. I suspect that there was tweaking of the framework, as I stated earlier.

    In addition, African American History and African American Studies are not the same thing.
     
  19. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,499
    2,734
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Very instructive, although not to my reading it all something justifying the state's actions. I saw nothing problematic in section 4 at pages 23 to 27. I was going to cut and paste but I don't know how that fits in with the four paragraph rule. By its definition, refers to "movements and debates". It is describing various debates and movements about the African American experience in the United States. I think the state's true intent is especially illustrated by your other link about acceptable African-American history


    The following is in the required instruction statute, s. 1003.42(2)(h), F.S.
    • The history of African Americans, including:
      • the history of African peoples before the political conflicts that led to the development of slavery;
      • the passage to America;
      • the enslavement experience;
      • abolition; and
      • the history and contributions of Americans of the African diaspora to society.
    In other words, African-American history stopped in the United States at abolition with the passage of the 13th amendment. The terror of Reconstruction, Jim Crow, the lynchings and the Civil Rights movement. All of that is surplusage, unnecessary to be taught, and potentially subject to indoctrination. Debates about a very simple description of some of the movements should not be covered in Florida public schools. It's simple erasure of history, with the intent to perpetuate the current caste system
     
    Last edited: Feb 9, 2023
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,622
    908
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    You're conflating two different subjects, African American History (which is already taught as an elective) and AP African American Studies.