Sure man… I mean, I quoted your post from October saying they were both in their underwear (a lie) and suggesting they had “a relationship of trust (another lie)… and anyone can go back to page 1 of this thread and see it… but if you still want to pretend that didn’t happen… okay… I’m sorry the video today disappointed you, and really was just another deranged Trumper accosting an old man in his house for poltical reasons. … better luck next time.
Yea, and women have accused Biden of molesting them. I said at the time that that one came out that I would wait for the facts. You should try it sometime. People accuse others of things all the time. Doesn’t make it true. Those boys at Duke spent a few nights in jail and would have spent years in prison if their parents didn’t have the means to get to the truth. The fact that you replied to my post at all tells me how blinded you are by an R before or after a politicians name.
Sure admit your lie, I never said they were gay. With that said that video was crazy, showing the attack on Pelosi who actually does appear to be in boxers, but most likely being woke up by this idiot from sleeping.
So you don't think the lie you repeated, that the two men where found at 2AM, both in their underwear, suggested they were gay? OK. I guess you hang out all the time with your hetro friends in your underwear ... good to know...
You just keep digging and your wrong once again, I never stated that, so stop lying. Yes, I do have more friends that are heterosexual don't recall ever just sitting around in our underwear talking. You need to get those perverted thoughts out of your sick little mind stud muffins
Okay. So, why was there a dispute as to whether or not this body cam footage should be released? What was shown in that video can be found in countless movies, cable TV and streaming service series, video games, etc. It pretty much "convicts" the perp of B&E and assault/attempted murder.
The reporting is that the defendant's lawyers argued it would irreparably damage his right to a fair trial and that the court entered a ruling releasing the materials after several media outlets moved for their release.
Going back through the original October 28 thread on the attack confirms my memory of some of the outrageous untruths and speculative rumors spread by people who were falsely convinced and oh, so sure DePape was not one of theirs. In addition to others mentioned and not mentioned earlier in this thread who grasped at straws, promoted deceitful and salacious scenarios was this outstanding gem. But for the first 4 and last 3 words in the quoted post, there is not a breath of truth. Paul Pelosi violently assaulted in home overnight "The guy's a nut. Apparently they knew him. He's a part of a hippie enclave in Berkeley. The 911 call has Mr Pelosi telling the dispatch they know they guy and even gave out his name. That's probably why he had so easy access to their home. The question now is why was he there? Was he high on something? Not political from what I've read elsewhere. Just some stoner who probably has mental issues."
Keeping in mind that at least six wrestlers were on the OSU wrestling team when the abuse was occurring were of the opinion that Jim Jordan was aware of the abuse. Are you suggesting that they are fabricating their stories?
and he won't drop the drink. is it safe to say it's a cocktail? even if it's not what is he doing with a robber in his home and a drink in his hand? police first reported a 3rd person in the home. maybe that was who opened the door. odd the Pelosi's don't have an alarm system. SF is not the safest place in the country.
Yeah terrible false equivalence. Fabricating a story about Pelosi’s attacker being in his underwear and suggesting he was his gay lover as well as the attempts to paint Depape as some BLM liberal is NOT the same as reporting on the stories of the 6 wrestlers. One is complete fabrication and the other is not. Period.
Yeah Paul was having a cocktail with the dude that broke into his house by smashing through his window with a hammer. That’s definitely “safe to say.” Good lord man. You’re so far gone.
Paul Pelosi attack, part 2 There was also a second thread where @buckeyegator dug himself in deep on the nonsense.