Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,083
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    If Gateway Pundit presided over health policy, in March 2020, the US likely would have suffered far fewer deaths.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Was there any verification for the implication that these deaths were due to the vaccine?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,083
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    More than two years now since the claimed discovery of a new pathogenetic virus SARS-CoV-2, which purportedly caused a disease called “covid,” supposedly having now resulted in the deaths of over one million people, the theory that such a virus actually ever existed has become untenable to anyone with common sense.

    Drip by drip, scientific results and analyses have come in, and it’s now known that to have made the case for this theorized virus, inconclusive scientific conclusions were proclaimed as fact, crucial experimental steps consistently skipped, inconvenient scientific results ignored, logic disregarded, language re-defined, and wide-scale statistical fraud carried out.

    When even a short survey of what we now know is considered, it becomes clear that no such virus was ever found, and that to properly escape from the spiraling disaster this delusion spun upon the world, the theory itself must be thrown out as soon as humanly possible.

    It's Time to End The Tragically Misguided Theory of SARS-CoV-2
     
  4. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,900
    2,055
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    The partner saying that it was an accident isn't confirmation for you? Nor is a person's sister using euphemisms for suicide deaths that are typically used on social media (e.g., stuff about not knowing what a family member is going through)? Having decided to involve their deaths in your political beliefs without any actual evidence, are you now stating that their manner of death is your business and the families need to provide you a death certificate and copies of any autopsies?
     
  5. gatorplank

    gatorplank GC Hall of Fame

    1,354
    195
    1,793
    Apr 25, 2011
    Roe is only the first domino. The abortion mills are still open in a lot of states. It is still a big deal because innocents are still dying every day in America. The vax vs. anti-vax is not anything close to that. I look at vaccines as a freedom of conscience issue. If you want to take it, then good for you. If you don't want to take it, then good for you. I'm just posting some stories I thought were interesting I found on Facebook. It is nothing more or less than that.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,739
    1,825
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    Well, unlike you, I am truly anti vac & truly anti covid & truly anti death. I will only vote for pols that tell me they will make Covid illegal. Enjoy your death cult & dominos.
     
  7. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,739
    1,825
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,900
    2,055
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Well, it is a good thing that spreading rumors with no evidence about deaths via social media is a victimless activity (if you ignore the family and friends of the person who died, but it isn't like they matter at all).
     
  9. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    What did you find interesting about these stories sufficient to post them on a thread about coronavirus?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  10. AzCatFan

    AzCatFan GC Hall of Fame

    12,099
    1,145
    1,618
    Apr 9, 2007
    Posting single, anecdotal deaths is meaningless. People died before COVID and subsequent vaccine. Unless there is a sharp rise in say athletic cardiac cases after the vaccine, then single anecdotes only promote fear. And the reality is, there is no sharp rise in cardiac athletic cases.

    As for abortion, making it illegal doesn't stop demand. And where there is demand, supply will fill it. Like prohibition, drugs, and yes, abortion. Know what else happens when legal abortion is made more difficult to attain? Increased suicide in women of birthing age.

    For someone interested in saving lives, how does this make you feel?
     
  11. gatorplank

    gatorplank GC Hall of Fame

    1,354
    195
    1,793
    Apr 25, 2011
    I just thought it was interesting. A lot of young people are dying premature deaths due to cardiac arrest. And there is a possible connection with COVID and the vaccine.
     
  12. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,083
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    All Covid deaths were anecdotal.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    It would have been more interesting if you had posted stories about young people dying premature deaths due to cardiac arrest.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  14. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,083
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Be interesting to find out how many vaccine deaths if we coded vaccines like we coded Covid. All deaths with 30-60 days of being vaccinated.
     
  15. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,083
    1,191
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    • Funny Funny x 1
  16. QGator2414

    QGator2414 VIP Member

    18,264
    1,565
    1,308
    Aug 24, 2009
    Ocala
    Personal Analysis Validating Malhotra’s Pfizer Statistics

    The efficacy of the vaccine was determined by looking at the total number of COVID cases from the original Pfizer trial (170), cases per placebo (162), and cases per vaccinated (8) gathered from July 2020 to December 2020.

    Vaccine efficacy can be calculated as follows: risk of COVID among unvaccinated (0.88) – risk of COVID among vaccinated (0.04) / risk of COVID among unvaccinated (0.88). This is 0.88 – 0.04 / 0.88. This gives the 95% efficacy rate.

    Pfizer data also revealed a surprisingly low infection rate for both the placebo and vaccinated groups as there were only 170 total infections out of the 36,523 trial participants…”

    As noted the data shows that severe disease and death are also not shown to be a thing by Pfizer’s own data. But the propaganda won the day. While @duggers_dad and I disagree on viruses slightly. He is correct on a lot of his assertions.

    Malhotra Part 1 | Regenerative Medicine Center - Dr. Valerie Donaldson MD Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania PA

    Pretty sure I posted the study already but here it is again…

    Curing the pandemic of misinformation on COVID-19 mRNA vaccines through real evidence-based medicine - Part 2
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  17. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,917
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    What makes you assume they are due to vaccine?
     
  18. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,917
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    This is outstanding.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. defensewinschampionships

    defensewinschampionships GC Hall of Fame

    6,275
    2,400
    1,998
    Sep 16, 2018
    Why are we still talking about this?

    It’s endemic now.
     
  20. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,707
    1,374
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    All incorrect.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1