Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

A fusion reaction may have been achieved

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by oragator1, Dec 11, 2022.

  1. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,895
    5,588
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Like Like x 4
    • Informative Informative x 4
  2. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,847
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Huge, if true.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
  4. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,885
    1,993
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Wouldn't a net energy gain violate the 1st law of thermodynamics? Or has it just been too long since I've been in a physics class?
     
  5. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    7,053
    1,063
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  6. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    2,899
    723
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    E=mc2, so conversion of mass to energy? The energy is being released from the fusion process, not the laser.

    note: I am not a scientist and just guessing.
     
    Last edited: Dec 12, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,626
    1,606
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    I have never understood how this fusion thing doesn’t break the laws of thermodynamics.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  8. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    2,899
    723
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Here’s a fusion for dummies (like me) explanation:

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  9. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,885
    1,993
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    That would be the only thing that makes sense. Not that I understand it, but at least it doesn't fold the universe in on itself.
     
  10. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    2,899
    723
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Note my post incorrectly noted “fission” instead of “fusion”. I fixed my original post.
     
  11. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,885
    1,993
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    All good. I guess it's no different than an atomic bomb converting mass into energy. Maybe I'm just thrown off by a "net energy gain" and what that means.
     
  12. partdopy

    partdopy GC Hall of Fame

    1,493
    356
    1,973
    Feb 1, 2012
    Total mass of the nuclei created by fusion is less than the total mass of the two nuclei that fused. Difference in mass is released as energy. More energy than you put on to combine the nuclei, although the resulting lower mass means less 'potential energy' remaining. You haven't created or destroyed anything, simply traded mass for energy.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    It's important to keep expectations tempered. Achieving a net gain from fusion is a huge step, but we're still a very long way from developing economically viable, utility-scale plants.

    After all, solar panels and wind turbines already provide theoretically unlimited clean power. It's the cost to build them that is the limiting factor. It will be the same with fusion.
     
  14. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,372
    6,288
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    I thought that fusion did not violate the 1st Law of Thermodynamics because no new energy is created, merely converted to a different form and released?? Thus no violation of the conservation principle...but, that might just be pulling from my arse since it has been a really, really long time since I have typed the 1st Law of Thermodynamics, let alone applied it to anything.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  16. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Bazinga!
     
  17. Sohogator

    Sohogator GC Hall of Fame

    3,568
    576
    358
    Aug 22, 2012
    If we get nuclear fusion on Biden’s watch we’re going to need another face on Mt. Rushmore.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  18. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,215
    13,198
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Amazing if true, could be a game changer!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,553
    2,782
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philosophically, in terms of human thinking, will fusion replacing fission (if it happens) effectuate a change in the way we see the world as combining instead of dividing, more symbiotic? Is this another moment like when quantum supplanting/supplementing Newtonian physics, in which we had to confront the fact that maybe God did play dice, makes us reevaluate our philosophy?
     
  20. archigator_96

    archigator_96 GC Hall of Fame

    3,745
    3,553
    1,923
    Apr 8, 2020
    Soooo... I could trade my ex (mass) for a tank of gas (energy)?
    Count me in.