Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

NYC round up

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by WC53, Dec 1, 2022.

  1. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,847
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
  2. mrhansduck

    mrhansduck GC Hall of Fame

    4,759
    993
    1,788
    Nov 23, 2021
    That sounds right to me.
     
  3. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    You appear to be clueless as to what is being proposed and who these people are.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  4. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    What's being proposed is taking people off the streets against their will because a cop says they appear mentally unstable. And some people probably support it because those people make them uncomfortable when they see them, and we cant have people being made uncomfortable by the messed up outcomes this country's policies produce. If a conservative politician proposed this you'd likely be horrified and call him an authoritarian.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    Even if you were to take the best faith notion that they are being detained to "help" them with their mental illness, do you think a system that operates on profit and is always concerned about costs is equipped to actually help people that cant pay a dime?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,881
    813
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    This is such a tricky problem. Mentally ill people often aren’t capable of making the decision that could get them healthy.
     
  7. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    Yes it is a tricky problem. As is providing medical services to people unable to pay in a system that demands payment for medical services. The idea that this will amount to anything other than disappearing undesirable people into some kind of blackhole seems unlikely to me.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,847
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Sorry, but it doesn't seem like a tricky problem to me. If a person is a threat to themselves or others, they get the decision taken from them. If they're not, they are adults and are allowed to make what we consider bad choices. That's part of living in a free country. The government doesn't get to arrest and detain people because it feels they're an eyesore or a nuisance.

    If we really want to get serious about helping mentally ill people, there are a lot of evidence-based steps we can take to provide them healthcare, housing, resources, etc. But we don't want to spend the money to do that. So no, I'm not going to ever support the government having the power to arrest and detain people simply because they're accused of being mentally ill.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  9. buckeyegator

    buckeyegator Premium Member

    73,189
    1,940
    3,883
    Oct 29, 2007
    gainesville, florida
    somehow germany in the 1930's comes to mind, lock up all your " mentally ill " opponents.
     
  10. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,881
    813
    268
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    My town, DeLand, can be a bit liberal with Stetson University being in the center of town. They always are proposing and willing to fund a homeless shelter. The issue is they want to put it halfway between Daytona beach and DeLand. Basically where no one lives and right next to the county jail. There is a game of ping pong with the homeless who bus them to Florida in the winter and then Daytona busses back up north when the weather warms up. During bike week Daytona busses then to DeLand. No easy or cheap answers here.
     
  11. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    I think the answers are pretty easy and straightforward to homelessness and medical care, its to provide those things universally and guarantee them. The countries that do that dont have homelessness or mental health problems to the scale that we do. The difficult part is all the vested interests and an economic/political system that prevent that from coming to be. Mostly we have a system that at best simply wants to do elaborate or insane things to hide the problems when they become inconvenient, typically that means criminalizing things and letting the cops deal with it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Thanks for proving my point.

    The reason to do it is not because it makes people uncomfortable, but because it is inhumane to leave people unsheltered who do not have the ability to take care of themselves.

    While there would have to be training and clear protocols I don’t think it is beyond a cops ability to make a preliminary assessment and bring somebody in to be evaluated. While I understand there is potential for abuse, leaving them out on the streets is also a form of abuse. The idea is to get them help.

    Id prefer to have a social worker there or consulted but it may not be practical. If one couldn’t be there perhaps they could be video’d in.
     
  13. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    29,799
    1,846
    1,968
    Apr 19, 2007
    They aren’t providing housing, they want to put them in a defacto jail against their will that they can’t leave. And do you seriously think they are going to provide the resources to help these people? It’s all about out of sight, out of mind.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,847
    5,787
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Except these people do have the ability to take care of themselves. The ones who are a danger to themselves are already eligible for involuntary commitment. This is all about making homeless people go away, not about helping them. And cops are already notoriously terrible at dealing with mentally ill people. This is a disaster waiting to happen.

    No, it's not. It's about policing choices you disagree with. Provide them options. Don't seek to strip them of their freedoms.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    15,214
    13,198
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Places like Las Vegas got into trouble for engaging in "greyhound therapy" i.e. buying one way bus tickets to get them the hell out of town with zero arrangements for what to connect to when they arrived at the some other place.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. fda92045

    fda92045 GC Legend

    585
    145
    1,973
    Feb 19, 2012
    The homeless shelters are awful in NYC. That is where the effort should go first.
     
  17. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,372
    6,288
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    It is light years beyond the comprehension of almost every police officer unless they spent 8 years + getting a medical degree with a psychiatric specialty.

    The fact that this does not terrify every single person is not shocking, but is truly sad.

    The mayor is basically empowering police officers to become judge, jury and executioner, the Constitution be damned and people are applauding it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,913
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    I must have read something different. I don’t see discussion of being arrested, being charged, being put on trial, etc.

    Executioner? FFS.
     
  19. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,502
    714
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    I can't possibly imagine laws like this mutating into rounding up everybody who spreads "disinformation."