Florida Gators at Texas A&M Aggies November 5 @ 12 p.m. ESPN

It's not transitive, ie, A&M took bama to the wire; are nearly as good as bama; therefore, we are on that level. We took bama to the wire early in the season but were not nearly as good as them.

 

It’s always great when the Gators win an SEC game on the road.

 

I appreciate "it". I did not criticize the team. The team played exceptionally well.

 

Every cavalryman smiles.

 

Did you notice how often our DBs blanketed their WRs? Odd, since for 8 games we had to believe it couldn't be done. We also didn't give up any third and impossibles. There was no reason for you to believe our front seven could play that well or that what appeared to be happening(again) the first half would be discontinued in the second. Our DBs were there, making catches difficult. Hmm.

 

By the way, you were not saying we dominated TAM start to finish, were you? We lost the first half. We also had three drives in the second half, two with short field(?), that would have all but ended TAMU's come back had we scored, because I believe we held a 10 point lead during those three possessions. We even missed a chip shot FG that would have put us up 13 and that alone would have made a comeback unlikely.

 

Yes, I’m saying that. We were basically at-willing on O, D was usual unsound but you could already see that King was feeling the heat. He was just beginning his descent into the weeds even in H1. H2 he was basically toast.

Hats off to our “new” DE’s, who were terrors, and also making me rethink my analysis of BCox all year. No doubt there was some extra motivation to prove themselves but it was good.

We were a couple plays from sniffing 60. It was a no-doubter early, you could see it coming.

We toyed with them on 4th and goal from the two. Missed a chippie. It was solid top to bottom.

Bad team? Sure. And that’s how you treat them. Bama would def like 41, your point about reductiveness is taken, and I agree with that.

 

Our D did have a poor start but really liked their play overall.

You can’t lose the first half and say we dominated. We didn’t. We owned the second half, no doubt, in spite of a few poor 3 and outs. It worked today. Hope what we saw was a defense that can shut some teams down. We will need it. Watching fsu miami. Gosh I hope we hand it to pretty boy’s team.

Do you find it odd we appeared to be better without Cox? I guess he looked good in practice.

Can anyone link me to Jumbo’s post presser?

 

Come back? We shut them out in the 2nd.

 

That would not make a ten point lead was insurmountable. I said a TD on one of those drives would have put it out of reach.

 

Careful! There are some on this board that might think you are suggesting scheme could have been the issue. Who would have thought pressuring the QB and playing tight coverage could be advantageous. Nawww! We have to recruit our way out of our defensive woes they told us. Hey, I'm in favor of recruiting top talent, but to suggest the soft zone has not contributed to the D's problems is a bit naive.

 

Better late then never, I guess. Let’s see what we do next week.

 

great, but what does this have to do with the A&M football game?

 

Your quote to the poster was so irrelevant that of course my point had to be taken as condescending even though it was much more meant to be a point of view that one might consider. Win or lose it must be said that finding anger towards another's view is rather ridiculous.

 

As I pointed out, I wasn't angry, and my post was completely relevant as he doesn't post anything but criticism. Either way, he finds fault with them, and can't just enjoy a victory. By the way, I don't get angry over ignorance.

 

Well, you know what they say...



Unless it is this. You never know these days...

 

Yet another childish post. Recess is over. Head back in now and straighten up your crayon box. Maybe Miss Kirby will give you a star today.