Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Soon we will have the shots referred to as horse paste by some like ivermectin. At least we know prescribed ivermectin is less dangerous…

***I am not a supporter of ivermectin as a Covid treatment unless one and their doctor deem it should be used***

 

Why posit a virus when none have ever been isolated and, as I have already established - with references - that all excess deaths can be attributed to other causes ?

 

Why keep posting false information? How a Few Sick Tobacco Plants Led Scientists to Unravel the Truth About Viruses | Science| Smithsonian Magazine Be better.

 

Already refuted TM with reference. Try paying attention.

 

Except they have been. I showed you a paper isolating a virus. You didn't read it. The fact that you didn't read it doesn't make it not exist.

 

I did and exposed its central flaw. You continue to cling to my niggling error of having initially directed you to the wrong section. More on the modern day equivalent of demonology ...

https://www.regjeringen.no/no/dokum...edleggId=03c4fc8f-c8f1-49c7-b176-07edebd0db06

 

False. Pseudoscientist proven wrong. Pathogenic viruses do not exist, as the German biologist Stefan Lanka proved in front of a court. - Poynter LOL Try to be better.

 

The courts neither proved nor disproved the existence of viruses, but did eventually rule in favor of Lanka ...

Measles Isolation Case – home

 

Poster is still intellectually dishonest. Courts stated that existence of virus was proven, but the pseudoscientist had worded his bet in a way that assured he wouldn't lose. He required ALL evidence of existence of virus to be from one single publication.
Lanka eventually challenged the judgment.[7] The case was re-evaluated at the Higher Regional Court (Oberlandesgericht) Stuttgart on 16 February 2016, where the original judgment was reversed. Six publications were submitted that collectively demonstrated the existence of measles virus and its diameter; however they failed to meet the contest requirements as set by Lanka who had stipulated that both details be covered in a single publication, something that would be unlikely to occur given the narrow focus of individual publications. Be better. Sigh

 

So’s your uncle ...

Most importantly, the Stuttgart court could not find any logical backing to the assertion that the six papers together or individually did not fulfill the criteria of the award — proof of the measles virus along with a determination of its primary physical attribute, the diameter of the virus (in other words, an electron micrograph of the virus particle along with a biochemical analysis of the constituent molecules of the same virus particle). (5) (6)

 

They want Covid amnesty for this ...

 

In one epic Twitter thread, Claremont Institute Senior Fellow Matthew J. Peterson (@docMJP) excoriates Oster's entire premise;

Hey—sorry you lost your job b/c of the vax that doesn’t work and your grandmother died alone and you couldn’t have a funeral and your brother’s business was needlessly destroyed and your kids have weird heart problems—but let’s just admit we were all wrong and call a truce, eh?

It’s too bad we shut the entire economy down & took on tyrannical powers that have never been used before in this country—looking back, you should have been able to go to church and use public parks while we let people riot in the streets—but it was a confusing time for everyone.

Hey I'm sorry we scared the hell out of you & lied for years & persecuted & censored anyone who disagreed but there was an election going on & we really wanted to beat Donald Trump so it was important to radically politicize the science even if it destroyed your children's lives.

OK, yes we said unvaccinated people should die & not get healthcare while never questioning Big Pharma once but we are compassionate people which is why even though we shut down the entire economy we also bankrupted the nation & caused inflation. You're welcome! Let's be friends.

 

Never Forget.

 

Poster should read his own link. LOL The Stuttgart court reversed the lower court because " Six publications were submitted that collectively demonstrated the existence of measles virus and its diameter; however they failed to meet the contest requirements as set by Lanka who had stipulated that both details be covered in a single publication, something that would be unlikely to occur given the narrow focus of individual publications." Not as poster wishes to suggest, the proof of the virus was substantiated. Be better.

 

Poster should note that I posted from same link.

 

Did not quote so you could mis-state and falsely misrepresent the court finding, in your own link. Total dishonesty. Be better.

 

Again, from the same source. Quotations this time may help you ...

“Most importantly, the Stuttgart court could not find any logical backing to the assertion that the six papers together or individually did not fulfill the criteria of the award — proof of the measles virus along with a determination of its primary physical attribute, the diameter of the virus (in other words, an electron micrograph of the virus particle along with a biochemical analysis of the constituent molecules of the same virus particle).”

 

Just checking in on this shark jumping thread. Yep. Still a living spiderman meme.

 

If only for a moment you’re taking on flesh to become like us. It’s truly magnificent.