You don’t even try: In the days following the death of George Floyd in police custody on May 25, 2020, Joe Biden wrote on his blog, “Protesting such brutality is right and necessary. It’s an utterly American response. But burning down communities and needless destruction is not. Violence that endangers lives is not.”
Good god. You claim leaders of the Democrats were either ambivalent or supportive of the violence. It’s pointed out that Biden made his opposition to the violence quite clear and you claim it doesn’t count?
So why do you guys continue to call Trump a racist when he clearly denounced it? This is the same garbage you guys are trying to pull with Biden. Trump and white supremacy: He did condemn it and has repeatedly
Trump caters to racists (“stand back and stand by”) and he pushes violent protests (Jan 6). That’s clear. Whether he is a racist or isn’t one is clearly speculation. Biden doesn’t cater to violent protestors. He condemns them clearly. Clearly Biden hasn’t inspired a violent protest.
This is exactly my take as well. I’m not even going to call trump a racist because the point is moot. That’s not the argument worth having. As long as you cater to, enable, and empower racists intentionally, you are just as bad as them even if you yourself are not racist.
I guess that’s why he waited over 60 days to condemn. He wanted to make sure that he had time to “clearly condemn” them. Please. The vast majority of Dems, including many of the same people here defending your party were either ambivalent towards, or felt the riots were justified( aka supportive). You all know what you were about in the summer of 2020, as long as they didn’t happen in your neighborhoods.
Multiple people already pointed out that you ignored the paragraph showing him condemning violence on May 30. Why are you pretending that didn't happen?
Biden clearly caters to creepy libbies. Kids who identify with animals. And he did not condemn the rioting in real time. And the libbie news hardly covered it. Your blind hate is incredible.
Blatant lie #1 How an urban myth about litter boxes in schools became a GOP talking point Blantant lie #2 Biden and all condemned violence. The difference is that is ALL you righties wanted to talk about. Not the peaceful protests for justice. Call me hateful all you want it doesn’t make your blatant lies less of a lie. You should be ashamed.
So you don’t think kids are identifying as animals and dressing like animals at school? It is happening and the progressives are encouraging the strangest shit.
On the other hand, we’ll be able to quickly identify furries and likely prevent future mass murdering. Oh it’s real. You are worse than a sucker, you’re an enabler.
That poster won't respond to the evidence that Biden condemned violence, it's the usual righty tactic: "Boldly make a loud and wrong claim, then ignore, dodge, deflect when that false claim is debunked."
Because it doesn’t matter whether he made a weak statement on May 30th or September 7th. What democrats did and didn’t do in the summer of 2020 was much more telling than what they said. Dem cities burned in 2020 and Dem leadership loved it. And when they were asked softball questions in regard to condemnation they obliged so their PR department (MSM) could bury the issue.
I never have called him a racist. At least I’m pretty sure I haven’t. But you seem to think that would excuse Aging's behavior on this thread. Why do you think that?
So you claimed that they didn't condemn the violence (false), then claimed that Biden didn't until Sept. 7 (false again), and now it doesn't matter that you are saying multiple false things because you are saying new false things ("Dem cities burned and Dem leadership loved it")?
You might need a break from politics. At least brush up on your debate skills so you don’t look like you are a blatant liar.
