Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

The Supreme Court Is On The Verge Of Killing The Voting Rights Act

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by philnotfil, Oct 4, 2022.

  1. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,028
    164,200
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    You set the algorithm up with the information on location of people in the state, but just where they are. There is no race, gender, age, religion, or any other identifying information. Then the computer has to draw the lines to minimize the circumference of the districts so that they contain roughly the same number of people in each district. You could have it use county boundaries as a primary line and then precinct lines.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    I've given up trying to make the photo small enough to post a picture of.

    I actually have a mini shrine on a shelf to Thaddeus Stevens and the passage of the 14th Amendment. They don't make them like the Great Commoner anymore
     
    • Like Like x 1
  3. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    It's much more complex than that based upon historical standards of factors you need to consider such as trying to keep together other historical communities, etc. But the bottom line is it doesn't matter. John Roberts will never allow that. They have consistently undermined independent redistricting. You are swimming they are trying to do something fair. They're not. They're trying to create a partisan advantage
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,225
    461
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    Never happen since it takes the reds and blues power away.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    For factors to consider in redistricting, see

    https://crsreports.congress.gov/product/pdf/IN/IN11618

    This case will likely get rid of the second consideration listed.

    Here’s an article on Roberts’ prior dissent trying to rule is unconstitutional independent redistricting conditions. The composition of the court has changed and he will likely be in the majority on a future decision. In fact, they may get there via Moore v. Harper. They are in a hurry to rule over society in every area possible

    Roberts' dissent then offers a lengthy rebuttal to the idea that authority given to a state's "legislature" could ever go to an independent commission instead, saying that the decision amounted to a "judicial error of the most basic order."

    'What chumps!': John Roberts' dissent in a major Supreme Court case is dripping with sarcasm

    Bottom line, this Court will not permit any reform or system they view as limiting Republican advantages in state houses. If Democrats had a majority of state legislatures, they would quickly overrule any prior decision on the independent legislature doctrine. They are pure political actors
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2022
  6. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,595
    500
    383
    Apr 3, 2007
    And now it’s run its course…. I’m not a fan of any racism or racist ideology. Democrats want to believe minorities always act and think differently than whites. I feel like we all basically want the same things. Democrats also don’t think minorities aren’t smart enough to do things like obtain voter identification. I do.
     
    Last edited: Oct 5, 2022
  7. 14serenoa

    14serenoa Living in Orange and surrounded by Seminoles... VIP Member

    4,820
    1,708
    2,088
    Jul 28, 2014
    Get out the Vote efforts in every state and county must help voters overcome ALL obstacles under=served voters face, plain and simple. The current trend toward nationalism will not magically disappear anytime soon. Maybe 10% of all Democratic campaign funds raised should support get out the vote efforts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Look. I dont put it past either side to try and work the system. So perhaps the pubs are here.

    But it isnt because they want IDs and verification of ballot validity. That is just political nonsense from the other side

    Gerrymandering is an issue that has at least on the surface raised my eyebrows, but this nonsense about not being able to get an ID is just rediculous.
     
  9. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,717
    932
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    The 14th amendment is central to this.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
  10. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    He literally posted 3 sites rated as liberal or extreme liberal by the ranking sites and two of his own posts.

    It would be like me quoting FOX, Breitbart, Infowars and two of my posts.

    So excuse me if I dont find his "research" compelling.

    Again, I dont have time to fact check every leftist comment nor do I care to...so perhaps the onus is on the person posting links to use unbiased ones.

    I dont read infowars posts and links either.
     
  11. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    All the stuff in this thread and you single that out?

    The point is I never just read a random post and assume I now "know" anything.

    The post could be baseless, biased and dead wrong.

    I should have taken a better approach as to not seem it was aimed at the poster as much as the comment and general idea that we "know" anything from a random message board post.

    If thats what you are saying than I can agree and didnt mean it that way.
     
  12. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise Hurricane Hunter

    15,746
    26,029
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    Absolutely.
    Everyone knows you can vote at 18. From this point of adulthood some form of ID is required to function in society. To drive, buy alcohol or cigarettes, to open a bank account or cash a check, to get a job etc...
    Claiming discrimination because you are asked to verify yourself is asinine. A middle aged person has had since the age of 18 to get some form of ID.
     
  13. swampbabe

    swampbabe GC Hall of Fame

    3,717
    932
    2,643
    Apr 8, 2007
    Viera, FL
    LOL to you baconators. The 14th amendment was specifically brought up in oral arguments several times yesterday.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,612
    2,861
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Love Justice KBJ! She laid it out there, unequivocally.

    Of course, your detractors are correct in one very cynical manner. The 14th Amendment facially guarantees equal protection (among other things), but almost from the moment it passed, our political culture has tried to make that guarantee as meaningless as possible. The Supreme Court has led the way.

    And they are still very much working on it today. So viewed very cynically, the 14th Amendment really is irrelevant, because we have elected not to actually enforce its language
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  15. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    What percentage of the country doesn't have an ID that would count for voting? Perhaps your experience isn't universal.
     
  16. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise Hurricane Hunter

    15,746
    26,029
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    That's my point. Everyone should have some form of state issued ID. If you don't then it's on that person. You need an ID to function in society. If someone claims discrimination that's on themselves. Federal elections take place every few years. If you don't have ID you have a few years to get one to vote in the next election. If you still don't have one then that your own doing.
     
  17. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    That didn't answer the question. What percentage of people don't have one?
     
  18. 96Gatorcise

    96Gatorcise Hurricane Hunter

    15,746
    26,029
    3,363
    Aug 6, 2008
    Tampa
    A quick search says less than 1 percent
     
  19. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    16,244
    2,096
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    That is significantly lower than every source I saw on a Google search. Brennan Center put it at 11%. What is the source for less than 1%?
     
  20. Nawlens Gator

    Nawlens Gator GC Hall of Fame

    3,908
    61
    253
    Apr 9, 2007
    Claiming discrimination because you are asked to verify yourself is asinine. A middle aged person has had since the age of 18 to get some form of ID.

    Amen to this. Also helps keep dead people, non citizens, and fake mail ballots from voting.