Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

War in Ukraine

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by PITBOSS, Jan 21, 2022.

  1. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Of course all this talk of Putin and nukes is predicated on the comfort myth that he’s losing, verging on desperation and sees a tactical nuke as his last gambit.
     
  2. Gatorhead

    Gatorhead GC Hall of Fame

    17,336
    5,615
    3,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philadelphia
    Kinda tough to order a counter strike and the end of human civilization.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. Gatorhead

    Gatorhead GC Hall of Fame

    17,336
    5,615
    3,313
    Apr 3, 2007
    Philadelphia
    Deafcon 1
    Essentially agree with G8tr
    Civilian Evacuations
    Covert Operation to kill Putin by any means

    If they launch retaliate
    Say goodbye to loved ones
     
    Last edited: Sep 27, 2022
  4. slayerxing

    slayerxing GC Hall of Fame

    4,902
    834
    2,078
    Aug 14, 2007
    first of all lol. Second of all things seem to not be going as planned since that July post. I guess the Russians have suffered 70-80 thousand casualties as part of a grand effective strategy. Every loss is a strategy, every win exactly as they planned it. Lmao.
     
  5. coleg

    coleg GC Hall of Fame

    1,765
    761
    1,903
    Sep 5, 2011
    Conscription going along as expected. More conscripts have fled Russia than have reported. LOL
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. sierragator

    sierragator GC Hall of Fame

    14,999
    13,156
    1,853
    Apr 8, 2007
    Iow grab your ankles and kiss your ass goodbye.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  7. chemgator

    chemgator GC Hall of Fame

    13,176
    1,810
    1,318
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think one option would be to provide Ukraine with non-nuclear longer range missiles that could reach Moscow. Tell Putin that if he uses a nuke, he could expect Ukraine to hit the Kremlin with a conventional missile, supplied by the U.S. for that purpose. That gives Ukraine and the U.S. the high ground for not responding with a nuke, yet still causing devastation to property that Putin finds valuable. If Russia uses a second nuke, we might have to step in and respond with a nuke of a military base in Russia, plus another nuke on Putin's favorite vacation home. We tell him what will happen ahead of time, so the responsibility is on him.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2022
    • Like Like x 3
    • Informative Informative x 1
  8. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,549
    1,985
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    I agree with that, but it’s easy to say what NOT to do. What should we do?
     
  9. uftaipan

    uftaipan GC Hall of Fame

    8,549
    1,985
    1,483
    May 31, 2007
    Fresno, CA
    Here’s my own answer:
    Summon the Russian ambassador and advise a complete cut in direct diplomatic relations. Russia is now in a direct conflict with the U.S. but the degree of that conflict depends on what Russia does next.

    Immediately place all strategic forces on DEFCON 2, conventional forces on DEFCON 3. This has the effect of putting our bombers on airborne versus ground alert, all warships to sea, all ground forces out of their bases to mitigate the effects of Russian nuclear attack. Full activation of Guard and Reserves, primarily for civil response, secondarily for overseas service.

    Once our immediate readiness posture is complete, President goes on television to advise Russia that their “special military operation” is now at an end. They have 96 hours to withdraw from Ukraine at the end of which the President will request a declaration of war from Congress. Channeling Kennedy, the President asserts that any future nuclear attacks from Russia against any nation in the world shall constitute such an attack on the U.S. and will result in a proportional retaliatory response.

    During that 96-hour ultimatum, parallel diplomatic measures occur. The U.S. sponsors Ukraine for emergency NATO membership. U.S. requests a General Assembly vote to expel Russia as a permanent member of the Security Council. U.S. advises China that it has reason to believe China has colluded with Russia in its invasion of Ukraine and nuclear escalation; in the event of another Russian nuclear attack, if China does not immediately retaliate against Russia, the U.S. shall consider China as part of the nuclear aggression. The purpose of this part, of course, is to get China to back Russia down.

    That would be my advice to the President. There are many what-ifs and how-abouts in that course of action, and I understand how dangerous that move is. But I simply don’t see how we can allow Russia to use nuclear weapons and not push the matter toward war.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2022
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,202
    676
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    Not a bad strategy. Sure hope we don't need to go there... but the Doomsday clock is certainly ticking faster the last few months.
     
  11. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    If the Russians have suffered 70-80 thousand casualties that means their entire contingent has been killed or wounded. There has likely never been more than 80 thousand, in Ukraine, providing support for an equal or greater number of Ukrainian freedom fighters. The Ukrainian freedom fighters have been doing most of the close-in fighting. Ukraine’s only advantage, to date, is that it outnumbers Russia, on the contact lines, up to 5:1. Of course partial mobilization has flipped the calculus.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2022
  12. danmanne65

    danmanne65 GC Hall of Fame

    3,625
    745
    243
    Jul 2, 2022
    DeLand
    Maybe hit all of Putin’s palaces?
     
  13. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    The US has the means to do that now. But of course Russia has the means to destroy them. Possibly even before they’re set up. And of course that would only escalate the war further.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  14. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,012
    1,600
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  15. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    The fact that it is not a conscription rules this out. Conscription is what the US did, for Vietnam, and what Ukraine has been doing for months as over half it’s standing army, formerly the largest in Europe, has been eliminated.

    Side note, there are more Ukrainians and Georgians fleeing to Russia than the reverse. And whatever losses Russia is incurring is offset by the nine million it will gain come Friday.
     
    • Funny Funny x 3
  16. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    A goodly number of American reservists defected or resisted during the Iraq War of 2003. Many were punished. Putin is just more proactive.
     
  17. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Also: Americans are leaving America. Many are renouncing their citizenships.
     
  18. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,012
    1,600
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    According Putin's announcement he was only going to recall Russians with previous military experience. It's not turning out to be the case and even if that was initially true Russians of military age without previous experience would be next.
    Russia drafted an old man with diabetes, a 17-year-old, and people with no training to fight in Ukraine, reports say — a sign of desperation
     
  19. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    15,473
    1,129
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    • Funny Funny x 1
  20. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,012
    1,600
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    You mean like Edward Snowden? For some reason I haven't seen long lines of cars at the US borders with Canada and Mexico transporting Americans trying to flee the country. In fact the opposite seems to be true especially at the Southern border. In 2020, 6,705 Americans renounced their citizenship out of a country with a population of around 330 million. Almost all of those did so in an attempt to avoid US taxes.
     
    Last edited: Sep 28, 2022
    • Winner Winner x 1