Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

FBI Executed a Warrant at Mar a Lago; the Investigation Continues

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by duchen, Aug 8, 2022.

  1. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,516
    2,763
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Never heard of that one. Very interesting
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  2. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,509
    746
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    I love this. Thanks phil!
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  3. murphree_hall

    murphree_hall VIP Member

    8,575
    4,304
    2,898
    Jul 11, 2019
    That was a perfect description of what I was trying to say. Thanks for sharing that definition.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Back in the debate days, we called it “spread debating.” Just make as many pints as you could in 8 minutes and how the other side doesn’t cover everything and then argue that you win because the other side didn’t respond to several important points. Which were usually arguments with little weight. Same concept.
     
    • Like Like x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  5. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,478
    5,409
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  6. enviroGator

    enviroGator GC Hall of Fame

    5,269
    698
    368
    Apr 12, 2007
    Or that by about page 10 we had actual evidence that he did in fact steal 100s of the most classified documents the US has. Documents he had absolutely no business keeping, or even having seen in reality. But you keep your head in the sand and insist that it is ok that a former President took these documents illegally and stored them at a country club.
     
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 6
  7. Gatoragman

    Gatoragman GC Hall of Fame

    2,574
    243
    288
    Jan 4, 2008
    I don't know for sure what he had, I'm not blindly following the reports from leaks or blindly believing what Trump advocates have said. But don't let being patient to try and discover the truth ruin your belief that Trump is the worst human being on this earth and because he is not a libbie he must be guilty
     
  8. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,752
    11,853
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    will the evidence be presented at court be believable to you? the problem for the gubmnt though is they cannot openly present that information for obvious reasons. I suspect that will be Trump's end game, to try and force the gubmnt to have to disclose the contents of the TS documents, which they cannot do. How do you prosecute if you cannot expose the evidence to the jury?
     
  9. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,533
    962
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Unfortunately there are lots of folks out there saying they will not believe a court’s interpretation and believe it is a setup unless they see the doc’s for themselves. Good argument, given they will never see the docs. Witch hunt! ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,478
    5,409
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    30,752
    11,853
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    $3M retainer - Now we know the cost to get Krise to risk his license and reputation

    Trump's document scandal has 'jolted' him so much he's shelling out $3 million for lawyer (msn.com)

    Having someone like Trump as a client and run the risk of not being paid at all or disbarred has meant that Trump can't find attorneys to help him when necessary. A $3 million check from the Save America PAC appears to be the way he was able to bring on Chris Kise.

    The former Florida solicitor general is making bank, Swan explained. New York Times Maggie Haberman noted that it's an indication that "this case has jolted him." He's "not known for paying lawyers."

    "It’s unclear if the sum paid by Save America PAC is going directly to Kise or if it has been placed in an account that Kise will bill as he works for Trump," the report explained. "Kise left the firm Foley and Lardner and set up his own firm, Chris Kise & Associates, in order to take Trump as a client. Save America made the payment as he was going through that complex process, so it’s unclear if the payment went to a financial vehicle controlled by his brand new firm or one controlled by another entity."

    The legal fees problem has become scrutinized by the House Select Committee investigating the Jan. 6 attack on Congress. Rep. Zoe Lofgren (D-CA) told reporters that the committee members are researching whether witnesses had their legal fees paid for by Trump as a kind of agreement to protect him. The concern is that it could be considered witness tampering. The finances around the Jan. 6 attack and the legal fees are expected to be part of the next public hearing.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  12. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Not Leaks. The warrant inventory and parts of the affidavit have been released.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Last edited: Sep 15, 2022
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 5
  14. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,471
    1,302
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Get paid upfront, Mr. Lawyer…lol
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. metalcoater

    metalcoater All American

    487
    32
    253
    May 30, 2007
    Sure, put up or shut up.
     
  16. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,746
    22,531
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Judge shopping was effective. He found one willing to ignore the evidence and the law in order to please him. In the denial today the judge Cannon said the only claims that the material was classified was by the federal government- which, of course, is the only entity that can classify federal documents
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  17. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    6,544
    2,468
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    I’m not as convinced as you. She was very careful in her order. The Government’s sole shot at an 11th Circuit stay is the Court’s full buy-in to the jurisdiction argument.

    Meanwhile, with her denial, I’m curious whether the motion for stay has been filed before the 11th Circuit already.
     
  18. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    She hasn’t cited one civil case in any of her decisions. All the cases she cited are criminal cases. There is no authority for a court to enjoin a grand jury investigation or to apply a prophylactic exclusionary rule to an investigation. There is a pending case in DC and another pending search warrant case. In addition, she had ignored the holdings in Nixon v US, Nixon v GSA and Trump v Thompson.
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    13,773
    5,153
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    You do criminal law, right? File a civil motion like this after one of your clients is searched.
     
  20. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,746
    22,531
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    No, I’m retired and used to wrangle bears. No offense but I’ve long believed that the more lawyers a layman knows, the worse his quality of life. It’s worked out well for me.:)
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1