They obviously cannot do so and instead have resorted to attacking the agency responsible for enforcing the law.
I saw unconfirmed speculation that it may be about Israel. Excluding the US, only 7 countries have confirmed nuclear capability so it’s not a long list from which to speculate.
ot but was in Rome last month and got this pic. looks like we were standing in the same spot at some point
This is, as often, at the crux of the issue. The claim comes from the DOJ. To anticipate a possible response, “the DOJ can’t be trusted”, we are left with the same question. Says who? Maybe Trump. Now, same question: Who says he is trustworthy? At some point we need a real criterion for trustworthiness. Personally I prefer institutions to individuals, though both can be mistaken.
How The Washington Post Fact Checker tracked Trump?s ... https://www.washingtonpost.com › politics › 2021/01/23 Jan 23, 2021 — The Fact Checker counted a total of 30,573 false or misleading claims made by President Trump during his White House tenure. I'd place this loser in the untrustworthy category.
Ex-FBI boss warns search warrant targeting Trump could be thrown out (wnd.com) A former FBI boss is warning prosecutors in Joe Biden's Department of Justice to be aware that the search warrant used against President Donald Trump – allowing an FBI raid on his private property – could be thrown out. "Because the scope that they were looking for was every single document generated during the Trump administration — that just seems too inexcusably overbroad. Now there's indications that they (the FBI) collected much more than they were authorized to collect." Brock, a special agent in charge of the Cincinnati Division, was named assistant director for the Office of Intelligence in 2004 by then-director Robert S. Mueller. In fact, the FBI is known to have collected Trump's passports, including those that were expired, and reports have said the bureau's agents even took disallowed attorney-client privileged material and health records. The FBI agents, in fact, arrived by the dozens, ordered staff in the home to leave, told them to turn off the video surveillance system, and then inspected even rooms used by Melania Trump and Barron Trump. The FBI later released a photo of allegedly secret documents spread across the floor, triggering charges that it was staged to make President Trump look bad. Agents ended up taking boxes and boxes of materials, claiming they contained classified material. Trump has confirmed he declassified the documents he had, which as president then he had the authority to do.
The whole declassification angle is garbage. Not one of the filings by Trump’s lawyers has referenced the declassification of documents as a defense as to why he had possession of the materials. Why? Because it’s just more of his bullshit. And even if he declassified them, they should have gone to the archivist, not Mar a Lago. Why don’t you make a FOIA request and see if the guv will send you the declassified documents? Relative to the warrant, an “overly broad” attack is always a risk. However, I did read somewhere (can’t remember where) that the reason some of the personal items like the passports were taken were to support the claim that the documents were improperly secured and commingled in with some everyday personal items. Time will tell if that proves correct.
Although I do not have the requisite authority, I am nevertheless awarding you the post of the day for the last line of your post above. Unfortunately, I can smell it.
The personal items such as Passports, and privileged items, such as medical records or items with attorney-client privilege were in the same boxes as the items the FBI were looking for. Since many of these boxes contained classified documents, including many Top Secret and TS/SCI documents, the agents conducting the raid didn't have proper clearance to open the boxes and check for content. That's generally not what FBI agents do with a warrant anyway. What did happen was the boxes were taken, and as items were found to be not in the scope of the warrant, they were returned to Trump. The Passports have already been returned, and the DOJ has stated a small number of the docs are likely covered under attorney-client privilege last week. The DOJ won't use the contents of the privileged docs for anything. But their existence will help prove that Trump had his lawyer lie on the affidavit when Trump stated he no longer had any classified docs in his possession. In the end, this argument is silly. If the police are searching for drugs with a warrant, and find a box that contains heroin, but also recent medical records, if the police take this box, does it make the warrant void? Of course not. They are looking for the drugs, and found them. The med records are privileged, and can't be used against the alleged criminal other than to prove the defendant knew of the box's existence, since he/she put the medical records in it.