Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Helluva speech by President Biden

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by Trickster, Sep 1, 2022.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Who cares what the percentage is. If tour is a high as you say, and it probably is, then the movement is even more dangerous and normal people need to understand this even more.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    You keep taking that statement out of context. That was not his definition of a MAGA Republican. That was his criticism of their policy positions. He clearly defined the danger to Democracy from MAGA, which you keep ignoring.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  3. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    He can’t put what was said in context. Because he just skips those parts. Guess why.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  4. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Gore was Vice President and had to stand where Mike Pence did. He didn’t claim the authority to reject the votes from Florida.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  5. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,702
    1,785
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    That is what I said, it is also explicitly what Biden said. What elevates it to a threat to our democracy or our republic is when people won't accept the results of elections or resort to violence in their political efforts.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,164
    438
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    [​IMG]
    Speech from the uniter didn't go over well with I's...
     
  7. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,869
    1,985
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    Source?
     
  8. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,641
    777
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    Agreed.

    I want to slap the person that composed that set of questions. Just awful everything.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  9. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,641
    777
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    Trafalger Group

    I should have guessed based on the question set and the lack of a respondant count.
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  10. tampajack1

    tampajack1 Premium Member

    9,495
    1,610
    2,453
    Apr 3, 2007
    I gave a lengthy and thought out answer to your primary question but it’s par for the course for me to not answer your moronic question about whether anyone who questions an election result is a traitor? You’re a piece of work. The answer to your question is no. For example, when the Republican Party in Florida found someone with the same name as a Democrat candidate for office and got that person’s name put on the ballot as a third candidate, it wasn’t traitorous to say that the election was stolen. Trump’s situation is different, as you know. It strikes me that you fit right into the category of the people who are jeopardizing our democracy.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. channingcrowderhungry

    channingcrowderhungry Premium Member

    8,869
    1,985
    3,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Bottom of a pint glass
    I just saw the kind of elementary looking graph and no source on it. Was more curious than anything
     
  12. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,164
    438
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,641
    777
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
  14. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,882
    838
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Here's Trump condemning the riots and conceding the election:



    "But 715, he spent every two seconds before and after that claiming the election was stolen."

    So did Gore, Clinton, and Abrams.

    Democrats have not accepted Presidential election results that didn't go their way in my lifetime apart from the Bush-Kerry election.

    Was it on the level of Trump on January 6th? No. But when people like Joe Biden say "people who don't accept the election results are a threat to democracy," is he only talking about the violent actors and the people who basically wanted Pence to basically count only the votes that Trump wanted... or is Biden basically talking about anyone who won't let the 2020 election go... the people who are SAYING the 2020 election was stolen. If it's only the former, you're only talking about a really small group of people.

    With respect to the latter, I don't believe the 2020 election was stolen, but spare me the sanctimony about respecting election results by agreeing that the election wasn't stolen. Democrats have done that in every single Presidential election that didn't go their way in my lifetime. As usual, the rule for Democrats is it's bad when Republicans do it, and it's fine when they do it. I think it's bad when everybody does it.
     
  15. duggers_dad

    duggers_dad GC Hall of Fame

    16,006
    1,182
    2,088
    Jan 5, 2022
    Did he mention again that it’s his F-15’s against our Mosbergs ?
     
  16. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,882
    838
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Because exactly what group of people we're talking about is kind of important when the President of the United States declares a group a "threat to democracy."

    In such a case, category errors are kind of a big deal. Don't want to lump in all Republicans apart from Liz Cheney, Ana Navarro, and the grifters over at the Lincoln Project in there now do we?

    Frankly, if we're going to lump in people who just believe that Joe Biden didn't really win the election, but will go on about their day quietly, then we should also look at a lot of Democrats who believe Trump "stole" the 2016 election or Bush "stole" the 2000 election.

    But if Biden's not talking about those people, and he's only talking about the January 6th folks, and the people who were trying to pull shenanigans in using the power of the Trump Administration to basically try to unilaterally decide the election... that's a really small group of people. Very easy to condemn them, but when Joe Biden starts talking about gay marriage, abortion, and mere questioning of the 2016 election results... he loses a lot more Republicans than just the group of people you seem to claim he was talking about.
     
  17. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,882
    838
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    And you strike me as a person who wants to silence your opposition, both broaden and narrow the definition of "threat to democracy" so that it encompasses all of your political opponents, but absolves all of your political allies, then use that as an excuse to treat all of your political opponents like garbage.

    I may be stubborn sometimes and a bit abrasive on this board. I have absolutely no respect for you.
     
    Last edited by a moderator: Sep 7, 2022
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  18. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,882
    838
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    My point is if you draw the line at the people who stormed the Capitol on January 6th and Republicans who basically wanted Pence to unilaterally decide the election... then you're talking about a pretty small group of Republicans.

    Even people who think the election was "stolen," the vast majority don't support what happened on January 6th, or Pence unilaterally deciding the election.

    The problem with Joe Biden's speech is that he didn't just bring that up. He seemed to bring up both people who JUST do not think that Biden really won the 2020 election but go on about their days quietly (where you can find a lot of Gore and Clinton supporters which are comparable on the other side), and people who just happen to be pro-life and believe in traditional marriage.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  19. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Total nonsense. You're just normalizing Trump/MAGA's antidemocratic behavior. That's sad. Nothing compares to what they are doing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  20. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,164
    438
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    If you notice, it's always a threat to 'our' democracy...they don't give 2 shits about yours.