Really, it depends on what standard is used to deal with hanging chads and dimpled ballots. I read that if each county did a complete recount, and were allowed to use the method they intended to use, Gore wins. If a state wide standard were set, such as 2 corners of a chad must be dislodged, then Bush wins. If the standard was the chad be completely dislodged, or one corner detached, then Gore wins. Glad we’ve moved on from the punch card ballots…. From a 2015 CNN article: Full statewide review Standard for acceptable marks set by each county in their recount: Gore wins by 171 Fully punched chads and limited marks on optical scan ballots: Gore wins by 115 Any dimple or optical mark: Gore wins by 107 One corner of chad detached or any optical mark: Gore wins by 60
And this doesn’t factor in the 2,000 or so Jewish senior citizens in Palm Beach County who voted for the anti-Semitic Pat Buchanan because of the screwed up butterfly ballot.
Why is this dangerous rhetoric? It’s the damn truth that you liberals have tried to cover up for several years.
It’s dangerous rhetoric because it’s not true and is designed to rule up people into thinking they were somehow wronged in a new way…. Basically the 88th disproven attempt to discredit our election.
If by dangerous you mean dangerous to the gop having a huge Nov then yes. This is turning off some of the gop and definitely independents. If he runs again, he shouldn’t talk one peep about the 2020 election. Run on how Dems handled Covid, the border crisis, and foreign policy. That would be his best chance. Keep talking about 2020, guaranteed to lose. Pointing out the medias and social medias coverage of Hunter is one thing. Calling for 2020 to be redone is dumb as hell.
which part is not true regarding the media and social media surpressing the Hunter story? Zuck and Dorsey have now both acknowledged they didn’t handle it right. Zuck just admitted on Rogan the FBI warned them about a Russian disinformation story coming out which is crazy since they had the damn laptop.
It's not crazy because the acquisition of the laptop was sketchy and the so-called damaging information on it was clearly loaded after the fact by bad actors likely Russians.
Have you seen the testimony from Zuck? Below is a refresher. FBI never mentioned laptop and Biden to Facebook. So what were you complaining about? That Facebook handled it wrong? Oh well. That’s on them not the FBI. Meta on Friday night responded to the FBI statement via Twitter. “The FBI shared general warnings about foreign interference — nothing specific about Hunter Biden," the statement said.
Yeah, that's true, and while I don't approve of counting "overvotes", Gore had an advantage of something like 20-30 thousand in overvote that that included him compared to overvotes that included Bush, which was probably also a symptom of the butterfly ballot, because apparently some people thought they had to vote on both pages.
Man, you guys are so funny. Love to connect dots when it helps your cause but won't look at facts in front of you when it's against you. Too easy LOL.
After this, you are no longer worth the time. You are at best intellectually dishonest and at worst a troll who knows they spew BS. The laptop was loaded with incredibly embarrassing and incriminating pictures, emails, text messages, and voicemails of the Bidens and more specifically Hunter. Did the Russians force Hunter to take those photos?? Did the Russians steal Biden's voicemails to Hunter? Then again, the FBI does miss stuff all the time... FBI has turned into a husband looking for something in the fridge that they can't see despite it being right in front of them. Good day to you.
Never been on either site, but thanks for playing. See, it's too easy to call out the far left when you are in the middle. You get upset and make stupid accusations that make you look somehow even more foolish than you were before. Shocking I know, but congrats.
Totally agree and I’ve also never visited either site. These libbies guys ought to go find another board where they can find the conservatives they think they’re supposed to argue with.
Yet, other than the drug use none of it was likely illegal. You want the feds to raid Hunter Biden because some crackpot former mayor obtained (allegedly) a laptop with embarrassing photos? The laptop itself is tainted evidence because of how it was obtained by Giuliani, it’s not likely law enforcement could act on anything on the laptop even if they wanted to or were inclined to. You get that, right? (normally I would take this for granted, but you don’t seem to comprehend that “Hunters laptop” is actually not usable by law enforcement). Yet it’s not exactly clear what crime is even alleged even if we consider every byte on the laptop. Being a scumbag or trying to grift off daddy’s name is not in itself a crime. The funny thing is Hunter by all accounts actually is being investigated for semi-related matters, mostly related to his finances/taxes, failure to register, etc. There is no doubt Hunter is a screwup. Remains to be seen if anything will happen to him in terms of criminal indictment, but I wouldn’t count on it. Most likely Hunter pays off whatever he owes and cooperates with investigators, and it ends up swept under the rug, as most white collar-type crime cases end up, let alone cases involving the POTUS son.
If I can jump in. They came out. They were no impact on Joe. Still aren’t. Ivanka took money (well trademarks) from China... Jarad took billions from Saudis Trump is getting millions from Saudi for LIV golf Trump Washington Hotel for millions from foreign companies staying in his hotel Trump bilked the SS for money to his properties for years Hunter was not connected to the WH while Biden was a VP and for some of the key time period was a private citizen until he knocked Trump off his sand castle. Personally I am not happy with Hunter’s existence but zero connects him to policy or benefits Joe gave him. Grow up. Trump lost.
