Christians starting to stand up against the Trumpification of evangelicals.

I'll believe it when I see it.

 

Another fake Christian Nationalist thread. Mohler is not a “Christian Nationalist”.

This is how you make up a false narrative and try to attach it to people. The real evil and wrong is what the OP is attempting to do.

This is the same nonsense as the bringing back up stories from a year and a half ago about DeSantis that were baseless with no factual evidence.

Sad but or for the course here…

 

I read the article and didn’t come to the same conclusion as the thread title.

 

Al Mohler, the president of the Southern Baptist Theological Seminary, called Christian nationalism “idolatrous” and pushed back on the idea that evangelical Christianity was linked to what had happened at the Capitol.

“Nationalism is always a clear and present danger,” he wrote a week after the insurrection. But linking it to “American evangelical Christianity,” he said, was an unfair “accusation.”

By this summer, Mohler had updated his thinking.

Speaking on his podcast on June 15, the theologian said: “We have the left routinely speaking of me and of others as Christian nationalists, as if we’re supposed to be running from that.” He added: “I’m not about to run from that.”

 

Know them by their fruits

 

He is stating that he is not going to run from the ridiculous argument that he wants America to have a state religion in Christianity.

Some of you need to stop making crap up and changing the context of what the a person means to something else in order fit a narrative you want to believe.

 

This exactly!

Mohler and his fruits speak to the fact he is not a Christian Nationalist. But we do have others whose fruit shows intent to deceive.

 

I read the statement, and this explanation of it seems like "making up crap" to me. Also, if you arent going to run from the idea America should have a state religion, what should you be called?

 

American Taliban?

 

Nat Cs, for short

 

In all seriousness, Christianity itself always loses its true power when it seeks expression through secular state power. The arc of the Papacy has demonstrated that

 

He is going to ignore it because the assertion is nonsense and baseless. There is no reason to address a false narrative like this.

 

Sounds like a Nat C to me.

 

We should have all taken that advice with your BS vaccine bleatings.

 

here’s the podcast. Can you point me to where in this he makes the statement and the correct interpretation? It’s long, so I assumed you already know where it is in the podcast. Thanks in advance.

 

I'm of the firm view that if one supports Trump, one is a CINO. I must confess, however, that my view, after decades of study, is based upon my understanding of Christ's message to mankind. I may misunderstand it. I don't misunderstand Trump, though.

 

They sold their soul for rock and roll