Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Down goes Cheney 65-29 oof lol.. don't give up on her libs, she will probably be on MSNBC by Monday.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by back2back2006, Aug 2, 2022.

  1. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Don’t worry he will post some long diatribe that has nothing to do with the facts and not even answer you.
     
  2. ETGator1

    ETGator1 GC Hall of Fame

    15,800
    1,760
    708
    Apr 3, 2007
    Cheney For President! as a democrat
     
  3. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    I directly answered him already. So that makes you wrong again. Its time to take your L!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yep, you want them to indict him. Just do nothing to investigate him for potential crimes. And the fact that they haven't indicted him shows that he did nothing wrong.
     
  5. Managator

    Managator Premium Member

    1,276
    250
    1,813
    Apr 3, 2007
    Too much to read all posts She did not bow down to a cult of personality. A cult of personality is Louisiana in the Long years, Germany with Hitler, anywhere the man is more important than the program. I respect her because she could have easily won if she gave up principles to stay in office. If I were in Congress with her, there would be very few in which we voted the same.
    We have a dangerous Senator (Scott) who has few principles except make money somehow and one who almost had some principle (immigration, citizenship) but wimped away. Sorry, started venting off topic. I can respect someone I do not agree with on issues.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Do nothing? How about not have the fbi raid the former presidents house. Besides that I don’t care. But you keep thinking that will work out for the Dems
     
  7. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,702
    1,703
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    I don't think so considering that on legislation she voted with Donald Trump over 90% of the time although to Trump and apparently the members of his cult substantive legislation really doesn't matter, the only position that matters is support of the false narrative that he won won the election and that it was stolen from him through massive (although in reality none-existent) voter fraud.

    Other than holding Trump accountable for his role in the events of January 6. 2021 name a single position in which Cheney is aligned with the Democrats rather than the Republicans. I asked you a similar question yesterday and am still waiting for a reply.

    Edit: May not have been you but another poster who suggested that Cheney was a Democrat. In any event still haven't received a response from either of you and am not actually expecting one.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  8. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Wrong again sport. I said you would type some gobbligook and I was right. Swing and a miss! Mad, you are keeping that hot streak going all the way from Covid till now. Tough to be the mush for that long but you seem to do it so well. Congrats Mush.
     
  9. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yeah, do nothing. A search warrant is pretty much the most basic investigative tool. You don't want them to use that. How else would they obtain evidence?
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Stop lying and take your L from not reading. You earned it again!
     
    • Like Like x 2
  11. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Did they use the search warrant for 1/6 or for classified documents? You don’t seem to grasp that issue. It’s ok. We will continue the conversation without you since you can’t keep up.
     
  12. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    I answered that question multiple times already. Do I need to do so slower for you, since you are struggling to understand basic statements?

    Tough break, sport.
     
    • Like Like x 2
  13. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    939
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    The search warrant was for items belonging to the national archives in the possession of someone else who had no right to take them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Funny Funny x 1
  14. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Imitation is the sincerest form of flattery. But you probably arent quick enough to figure that out sport. Oh well.
     
  15. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Okay, so slower for you then, sport?
     
  16. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    There is a right way and wrong way to go about doing something. The fbi did it the wrong way.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 3
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  17. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Yes, the wrong way is apparently to obtain a warrant from the courts to legally obtain evidence of crimes. The right way is...what again? A subpoena (oh, they did that)? A second subpoena? A third? Fourth? How many of those should they have done before searching for the documents themselves (legally)?
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    939
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    They asked nicely over a year ago. They didn't get everything. In June, they got a subpoena. They didn't get everything. Finally, they got a search warrant to get the rest. A search no one would have known about if Spraytan McFatty hadn't run his mouth.

    Now explain to me after the subpoena failed to get everything what they should have done differently?
     
  19. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Hopefully, in November, enough Republicans and Independents will have the understanding you do about the death of the traditional Republican Party and won’t be fooled into voting for it. But too many don’t really realize it yet.
     
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  20. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    You just can’t grasp it. Must be hard for you. I’m sorry you can’t figure it out. I’ll try using smaller words in the future.