Down goes Cheney 65-29 oof lol.. don't give up on her libs, she will probably be on MSNBC by Monday.

what makes them staunch?

 

But you are stating it as a fact. And you and I both know whoever is in power influences our judiciary.

 

Nope. But good try at deflection. I would too if there was no evidence. I wish there was but you guys keep playing boy who cried wolf with regards to indicting trump.

 

Wait. What?

Good lord thats a goalpost move. We were talking about 1/6. Not abortion.

People care more about the price of gas, rent, rates, etc than they do the 1/6 commission.

Every thread doesnt have to be an abortion thread man

 

Love ya 95 but I wouldn't put Murph in the category of "far" lefty .

I save that for the crowd that ran off Coach White ...right Murph?

 

If that’s true then those people are terrible humans. First, Biden doesn’t control gas prices. Second, voting against him cuz you’re pissed at gas prices vs being disgusted at the assault on democracy is basically a malpractice in citizenship.

 

I'm sure the single moms appreciate us telling them what they should be focused on.

 

Well, anyone who thinks it’s a slam dunk trump committed crimes on 1/6 is pretty far left to me. IF there was evidence they would’ve indicted him already.

 

I said that the 1/6 hearings showed what proof they presented. That is a fact. I didn’t say that the proof was factual. I believe it is, but I can make an informed decision because I actually watched the hearings. Regardless, that doesn’t make me a far-leftist.

 

Crimes of omission/lack of action, if nothing else seems quite probable dont you think?

 

Let me know who they are and I’ll tell them.

 

No. Think there are better odds for The Georgia finding votes issue than 1/6. And I stand by 1/6 show being a dog and pony show

 

Trumper!

 

You said to me I’d seen 1/6 shows I would’ve seen the proof. Well, if it was so obvious they would’ve indicted trump already. I want him indicted so he’s out of the picture but don’t think it’s going to happen.

 

You got me

 

The 1/6 evidence against Trump is damning, but it's not slam dunk level. One of the reasons why Garland hasn't indicted for this yet. Last thing Garland would want is to make Trump a martyr.

The other reason happened last week. The illegally possessing top secret documents at MAR is more of a slam dunk. Enough evidence to get a grand jury and a warrant signed by a judge. Garland could have decided to forego any charges on 1/6 until he knew how the classified docs as MAR played out.

 

To be fair Eisenhower and Reagan are pretty far left of Trump voters as well.

 

Are we seriously going to debate manners of speaking? It is common vernacular to say they have proof without also implying that the proof is incontrovertible. This is semantics. Obviously, I was saying they presented what they believe is proof.

 

Yep, those unhinged leftist can't be reasoned with, most are just as wacked about the fake covid vaccine