Forbes good enough for you? Best Stories Of The Decade: “How Donald Trump Shifted Kids-Cancer Charity Money Into His Business”
you think the left would have been ok with Obama, or any president on their side, act like Trump, or even nominate him for president?
Anyone that admits that they watch OAN because they think it is fair coverage of events automatically destroys their own credibility. Interactive Media Bias Chart Public - Ad Fontes Media
Why would Trump say evidence was planted before anything was said about what they found? I mean is he saying he has nuclear secrets are at Mar A Lago? If so then what was he doing with them unless there’s a lot of money to be made selling them on the black market?
The only part that is likely is selling them to Saudi Arabia. More likely he was holding the nuke docs for a rainy day (tens of billions, leverage or revenge). He knows they're valuable but doesn't have the cojones to commit treason.
There is probably a difference in the kind of personal flaws that most irk the two sides, but I would suggest that if the FBI under Trump raided Obama’s home to obtain classified material, the people of the left would be likely to be very much more skeptical of the motives of the DOJ. I don’t think either side has a monopoly on bias.
Quit wasting your time. Based on this guy's posts, random words haphazardly thrown together are sufficient to justify his opinions and beliefs. I doubt he has any interest in legitimate critical thought (disjointed stream-of-consciousness shower thoughts don't count).
They cannot include the alleged crime that was committed but the crime will likely be obvious to most of us.
Fox also used photoshopped images of Judge Reinhardt - putting his head onto Epstein’s body as he received a foot massage from Maxwell and also added in some booze. If you look closely just below the window you can even see the fake photo attributed to its maker: what I meme to say.com. Fair and balanced? I don’t think they are even trying anymore.
Actually, the suspected crimes may or may not be on the search warrant. If included, it may be redacted.
Trump's best defense is ignorance. Based on precedent, if he has mishandled nuclear or other classified documents, he should claim that he had no intent to do so. Didn't even know what was included in all those boxes. The FBI exonerated Hillary Clinton for mishandling classified documents by concluding that she had no intent to do so. It didn't matter that the law about the mishandling of classified documents says nothing about intent. Mishandling is mishandling. But how can the DOJ, per Comey's recommendation, exonerate Clinton on the basis of no intent, then turn around and charge Trump even if he claims no intent? It would look too political based on precedent and regardless of the law saying nothing about intent.
well that of course, but the Trump phenomenon is much bigger than just everyday political partisanship..
If Trump had done such a thing (and we actually know from multiple accounts he was trying!) it would likely be for the same reason he was hoarding nuclear docs. The common denominator is Trump is corrupt and rotten to the core. It doesn’t take bias to recognize what is abundantly clear. There aren’t always two sides to every issue, seems to even assume there are leads one to continually fall for logical fallacies. His lawyers are paid to invent “alternative facts” in order to defend their client. The rubes do it for free.
