wut? What a bizarre sequence of sentences. Why would the head of the Counterintelligence and Export Control section sign the unsealing petition if the potential charge was embezzlement?
I wonder how a search for classified stuff would be handled on site. Only certain team members could look at docs? Then could they be photographed (I doubt it) just sealed in envelopes or boxes? If the docs are so sensitive the handling would need to be restricted.
So...they ARE working on indicting him for embezzlement? Good to know! See, we don't need no stinking journalists when we have "The Noble Ones" on the other side and who post on Too Hot. That is a LOT of time I won't have to use and I can watch even MORE Cute Cat Videos on YouTube. Joy!!!
I love how trump now fully supports the release, when he could have done it at any point over the last few days.
The FBI agents worked as taint teams on site to separate client privilege stuff from the rest. I assume the rest (including classified docs) are taken to a SCIF for subsequent processing.
Hmm.... lets see... he had had them for more than a year and a half. Yeah, I can't figure out any reason they didn't go in half cocked and not plan it out. SMH.
Do you realize that OAN is a far right pro Trump outlet that routinely parrots news and opinions promoted by Russia? Do you care?
Sorry, I did not realize who I was dialogizing. Let me try this: It's called a "dipsey-doo". Maybe they don't teach that in your elementary school. I will try harder next time.
So, if it comes from CNN and they say "1+1=3", it is an unfortunate error because they "mean well" whereas if OAN says "1+1 is actually 2" it is evil intent because they are "tainted?" Good to know. You must have taken the New Math, where the answer is actually "it depends on what I identify as at this exact moment." And then you get a participation trophy. Again, Joy!!!
So you dont want to answer the question. Says a lot. You know that OAN is far right propaganda but you choose to belueve it anyway. How about we agree to use Reuters, AP, BBC, NPR, Bloomberg, WSJ for sources. Pick any 3 of them
I'm really not sure I understand his argument, but here's part of Garland's statement: If the FBI did not actually leave copies, one would think trump's lawyers would immediately respond with a statement to the contrary. They have not.
