Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Kansas overwhelmingly votes to protect Abortion access for women

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by WarDamnGator, Aug 3, 2022.

  1. BossaGator

    BossaGator GC Hall of Fame

    4,535
    189
    203
    Apr 10, 2007
    Arlington, VA
    valid read. I read the first sentence as pretty much the effective language of the amendment (basically “nothing herein shall be construed as prohibiting the right to legislate”), and the second as a clarification of the first (“this means the legislature can act in these areas. . .”)

    confusing or not, it’s not great drafting
     
  2. g8trjax

    g8trjax GC Hall of Fame

    5,164
    438
    293
    Jun 1, 2007
    Yeah, it's almost amazing anyone trusts politicians these days.
     
  3. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,670
    841
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    On top of this very much by design opaqueness of language, there was apparently a misinformation campaign trying to mislead pro-choice people to vote yes. So yeah, very much like the misleading Koch bros attempt to kill solar in FL as mentioned below.

    Fraudsters going to do what they do when they know they can’t win on merit or don’t have the truth on their side.

     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,688
    1,339
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Of course, you are 100% right, that is how it's supposed to be read ... this is why I always read the news paper's explanation of ballot amendments before voting, there have been a few times when my gut reaction after reading one was the wrong interpretation, and they've highlighted some sneaky language put into some of these that could produce some undesirable results.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  5. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,833
    5,778
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Must be nice to be able to convince yourself that you're being persecuted as you attempt to impose your "faith" on everybody else. But that's Christofascism for you.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
    • Agree Agree x 1
  6. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,527
    472
    353
    Apr 3, 2007
    If you don’t think murder is against Christian values you don’t understand Christianity. I’m no victim I just know the score.
     
  7. l_boy

    l_boy 5500

    12,909
    1,727
    3,268
    Jan 6, 2009
    Murder is a value based and legal judgement. It is not a universal fact, or even biblically based that abortion is “murder” in most cases. It is something that Christians and some Muslims have extrapolated from their body of beliefs.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. lacuna

    lacuna The Conscience of Too Hot Moderator VIP Member

    63,333
    3,709
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    Who wrote that amendment proposal? It has two spelling errors.

    "...laws that account for circumstances of pregnacy[sic] resulting from rape or incest, or circumstnces[sic] of necessity to save the life of the mother"
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  9. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,165
    978
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    Kansas has a liberal Supreme Court - currently has 5 Democratic appointees and 2 Republican. This was on the ballot mostly because the Kansas Supreme Court struck down Kansas’s ban on D&E procedures.


    But Kansas is also weird politically. It never votes Democratic for president ever, but has Democratic governors with some regularity.

    On the abortion issue they’re similarly weird - they elected Sam Brownback to the Senate and governor’s mansion repeatedly, but were also the location of one of the only late-term abortion providers in the country until he was killed.
     
  10. officelife

    officelife Senior

    213
    68
    1,808
    Aug 11, 2017
    The arrogance and self righteousness you have demonstrated in this thread is why people have a right to mock your form of Christianity and faith. You’re smart ass reply to Trickster’s question regarding rape, incest, or the health of the mother shows your inability to comprehend Christians and their numerous values.

    You do not speak for all Christians; if you did, we wouldn’t have two hundred different denominations of Christianity in this country.

    Claiming you are persecuted for your faith while living in a country where 80% of its citizens call themselves Christian; is the textbook definition of playing the victim.

    Many Christians believe abortion is justified in cases of rape, incest, or the health of the mother. Are these Christians not truly Christian in your eyes?
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  11. G8trGr8t

    G8trGr8t Premium Member

    31,143
    11,994
    3,693
    Aug 26, 2008
    Abortion isn't murdering a child.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  12. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well, they can vote in November if they feel that way. Simple solution. Supreme Court gave the power to the people.
     
  13. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,688
    1,339
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    I made some bad assumptions in that post, but as it turns out, the Kansas Supreme Court does not write the ballot initiatives. I thought in some states the state Supreme Court had to write, or get final approval, over the wording. This was apparently all the work of the state legislature.
     
  14. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,702
    1,703
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    The rationale that delegating the decision on the authority to regulate abortion to state legislatures is positive borders on the absurd. Reminds me of the argument that decisions regarding segregation including Jim Crow laws should made at the state level put forth by certain Southern politicians commonly referred to as Dixiecrats 60 years ago. If those decisions were left to the states schools in Southern states would still be segregated and Jim Crow laws would still be in effect. States should not be able to legislate decisions regarding bodily autonomy. Somewhat ironic that the party that promotes itself as supporting personal freedom has no problem with "Big Brother" interfering in what should be personal decisions. By the way the majority opinion in Dobbs was so broad that the majority would undoubetly uphold a federal statute banning abortion.
     
    Last edited: Aug 5, 2022
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. oragator1

    oragator1 Premium Member

    22,882
    5,578
    3,488
    Apr 3, 2007
    And in some gerrymandered states, they would have to win by 5-10 points to control the legislature because of gerrymandering. And that’s before the additional burdens some states are placing on voting, that, not coincidentally, disproportionately impact democrats.
    The deck is stacked against these laws ever coming down, even if the buyers don’t want them.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  16. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,558
    807
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    Come on dude. Excuses, excuses. IF people want something, they can vote and get it done.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  17. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,833
    5,778
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Every single part of this was the work of their Republican legislature. They chose the ballot language. They chose to hold it during the primary (when the college kids were away) to get a more Republican electorate. This was all about backdooring in this constitutional amendment to overrule their state's version of Roe. And they still lost, badly (59-41).
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  18. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,527
    472
    353
    Apr 3, 2007
    The constant attempts to insert racism into abortion arguments bore me. After all I’m the one trying to save the majority minority children here from murder.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  19. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,833
    5,778
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Yes, you're "saving" the minorities by stripping them of their autonomy, because you know better than them what's moral. A white man stripping Black people of their autonomy "for their own good"? Sounds familiar.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  20. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,527
    472
    353
    Apr 3, 2007
    Yes it is absolutely murdering a child. I respect people more that admit that it’s murder and they are still for it. If you don’t believe me there are actual videos out there showing a fetus getting it’s neck clipped with scissors while it writhes in the belly of the person that should love it the most. Watch that and tell me it’s not murder. For God’s sake give these kids a chance at life.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1