Garland doesn’t rule out indicting Trump

They need to indict Trump and lock his ass up. If you thought January 6th was bad, just wait until you see all the MAGA domestic terrorists who will attempt to break him out of prison.

 

Good, he got what he deserved. He wasn't just loud which by itself is not a felony, he was threatening to those inside. That he filmed himself committing a felony along with his misdemeanors just shows what kind of idiot this guy is.

 

You are entitled to your own opinion. But not your own facts. Trump waited 3 hours while the riot was on going, and never called the guard. Pence did.

Maybe you can find your truth in the basement of the building that houses Comet Pizza in D. C.? Here's a hint. The building has no basement, and like the pizzgate claims, your claims have no basis in reality.

 

So you mean he wasn't a victim of the KGB tactics?

 

Pretty high up underlings. LOL!

Nope, I will not move forward with you until you provide how they were addressed in Muriel Bowser's letter.

Just concede the point that you are not going to as I have your long false narrative you believe in by the balls in a vice as I crank the vice closed. Dang, that gives me shudders! LOL!

 

They were addressed as "Acting United States Attorney General," "Acting Secretary of Defense," and "Secretary of the Army."

Just concede that you can't actually provide any evidence to back your claim that Trump authorized troops. No forms authorizing the movement of troops. No statement from any of the people addressed in that letter that states that he had authorized such a movement of troops, nor any actual evidence of such a movement or preparation for such a movement.

You are just deflecting wildly to cover for the complete lack of evidence for the false factual claim that you made.

 

No, he may well have been subjected to having his door beat down at dawn by 12 to 15 KGB agents yelling at the top of their lungs while he and anyone in his home are cuffed by arms and legs while having assault rifles aimed at them whether they were at the capitol on 1/6 or not.

Capitol Punishment the movie on the internet at $9.99 would do you some good to understand what the US KGB has been up to.

 

So you are arguing that police are engaged in KGB tactics when they take a door, speak loudly, and arrest people that have committed one or more felonies? Or just when you identify with those suspected felons?

 

It's in this thread on the DOD report pages 16 and 31. Just because Trump did not issue an executive order to use the troops doesn't matter. He gave the verbal orders to these people at the top of the Department of Justice, Department of Defense, and Department of the Army, people you have the balls to call underlings.

Clearly Muriel Bowser in her letter rejected additional troops from the underlings you finally identified.

 

Mayor Bowers requested Federal help for Jan 6 for traffic and minimal crowd control. She, and several members of Congress requested the troops be unarmed because of the optics and actions the troops took during the D. C. George Floyd protests. Members of Congress were also worried the military would be loyal to Trump, and Jan 6 might be a treasonous coup attempt.

As it turned out, there were no troops initially on Jan 6. And it wasn't a treasonous insurrection, but a seditious one instead. And for three hours, Trump stayed in the Whitehouse, doing nothing, as the riot progressed.

But there were never 10,000 troops at the ready, or even offered to Mayer Bowers. That offer likely would've been turned down anyway, but again, there's no official record of any such request or offer. And official, under oath testimony that such an offer never existed.

 

I just read Page 16. At no point, does it say Trump issued any order for troops, like you claimed. On Page 16, all it says Trump did was ask in passing about preparations. At no point does it mention any authorization.

On Page 31, all it says that he said was that there would be many people that Mr. Miller should ensure that there were enough troops there. That is also not an authorization.

As such, you have failed again to provide evidence of your claim that he authorized troops. You made something up and are still digging.

The Mayor accepted DC National Guard and stated that she did not feel they needed additional troops and that she should be consulted if they sent any additional troops (she doesn't have the ability to reject troops moved by the President, it should be noted). As she is neither in charge of the security at the Capitol (Capitol Police) nor on the Mall (Park Police), that turned out to actually be correct, as there were not violent episodes outside of the Capitol and Mall on January 6.

 

No, I'm saying it about anyone in the same household who weren't in DC and most of these people have been charged with misdemeanors, not felonies. They are tactics of physical persecution of political enemies who basically walked in to the capitol at the invitation of the capitol police. These tactics make Obama's IRS scandal when he used the IRS to bludgeon the Tea Party look like, well, a tea party. All of the persecution of political enemies is being done by Merrick Garland for Joe Biden. There won't be enough votes to impeach Biden, but I'm hopeful that the AG impeachment requires a lesser number of votes to successfully impeach Garland.

 

Okay, provide evidence to back that next. You claim that most of "these people," referring to those that had their doors broken down, were not charged with felonies. Please provide evidence.

Another falsehood. They were not invited by the Capitol Police. You have not shown anybody who has a serious claim of a civil rights violation.

 

The troops offered were rejected. The rest is BS with no evidence, just a hate of Trump. Cash Patel testified before the committee that Trump did offer the troops.

Time to go to bed guys and gals. You need to admit the obvious. You bought democrat propaganda hook, line, and sinker and you are wrong. You will still be wrong tomorrow or as my 4-year-old granddaughter says tomorning.

 

You wouldn't say this if it was a republican AG using the tactics on democrats charged with misdemeanors. There is an h word that comes to mind.

Spend the $9.99 and watch Capitol Punishment. You can do it. Just take 2 hours away from here.

 

Translation: You don't have any evidence and are making claims not supported by the evidence. Again.

 

Obviously, none that you will listen to. How about this, you make the effort to show how many were charged and with what crimes being misdemeanors and/or felonies. That's your party hatefully taking these actions for mostly innocent protesters compared to your terrorist groups, Antifa and BLM.

I'll await your results.

In the meantime, watch Capitol Punishment.

 

BS with no evidence.

Do you have evidence to back your claim that Kash Patel did such a thing? Because there is evidence that Miller specifically did not. He stated specifically that there was no direct order from President Trump to have 10K troops at the ready for January 6.

 

You made the claim and now want to put the onus on me to independently investigate your evidence-less claim. Either back your claim with evidence or admit you made it up or can't provide evidence.

 

Well, one went to the joke 6 committee and lied. Which one did it? You watched the joke 6 while I have not. How about you dig up their testimony. Obviously, you quoting one of them means the testimony is in the public domain. You even know how to spell Kash's name. This is a partisan committee full of dems and 2 RINOs so you get the information and post it right here. Kash also said on cable news that he introduced the DOD report as the joke 6 hadn't bothered with it. They couldn't refuse to enter it into their records as Kash made it a part of his testimony, so he says on cable news.