Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

GOP 2022 - The Bareback Party

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by pkaib01, Jul 23, 2022.

  1. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,645
    777
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    The House of Representatives voted 228 to 195 to pass the Right to Contraception Act with all the nays being Republican. Included in the bill is the right to use a condom during sex.

    Why would GOPers be against condoms and how would hypothetical state prohibition work? Illegal to buy? Wear? Would both parties be breaking the law?

    Would condom use be prohibited as birth control during heterosexual intercourse while being allowed in the gay community?

    Since condoms were used during colonial times, would SCOTUS take an originalist view and rule that condoms are an unenumerated right? Would this contradict their view on abortion?

    Conservative board members... are you against condoms?
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2022
    • Informative Informative x 1
  2. AndyGator

    AndyGator VIP Member

    3,597
    351
    338
    Apr 10, 2007
    17th century party would be more descriptive.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  3. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,695
    1,341
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    To give perspective on why this law is being pushed by the democrats now, Clarence Thomas called for a review of an old SCOTUS case the made it illegal for states to ban birth control -- under the same philosophy they used to overturn Roe v. Wade . So I don't think that SCOTUS ruling in favor of condoms is a given, and yes, there are conservatives who believe Americans don't have a right to use condoms or any other birth control.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  4. VAg8r1

    VAg8r1 GC Hall of Fame

    20,703
    1,704
    1,763
    Apr 8, 2007
    Said it before, one of the most effective policies to prevent unwanted pregnancies and thus elective abortions is to provide easy access to contraception yet there is probably a close to 100 percent overlap between those Republicans opposed to codifying Roe and those opposed to guaranteeing access to contraceptives.
     
    • Agree Agree x 7
    • Like Like x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,553
    2,782
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Remember in slasher movies the couple that has sex gets killed first and the virgin survives. Self flagellation of desire, mostly figurative except for Opus Dei, occupies a primal pre-rational part of our lizard brain. We often battle our inner demons, usually unsuccessfully, by projecting and oppressing
     
    Last edited: Jul 23, 2022
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  6. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,139
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    More like the Brokeback party if you ask me. Bunch of repressed folks longing for the black and white era of the 1950’s. Welcome to Pleasantville, where your wife will have your dinner ready at 5pm and slide your slippers on your weary feet afterwards.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Like Like x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  7. Norcaligator

    Norcaligator GC Hall of Fame

    1,120
    147
    288
    Sep 21, 2007
    Because sex outside of marriage or for anything other than procreation is the devil.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  8. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,691
    1,819
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    [​IMG]
     

    Attached Files:

    • Like Like x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 2
  9. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    2,627
    820
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    Wrap that rascal.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  10. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    843
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    These people have lost their minds.

    I’m assuming their logic in voting against this, assuming there was any, is “states rights” or some such nonsense. So I guess at this point we can safely say the GOP puts states rights > individual rights. Can’t wait to see the first deep red state to ban contraception, it doesn’t even seem crazy to think they will, I’d almost lean towards it being inevitable.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. gatordavisl

    gatordavisl VIP Member

    31,785
    54,915
    3,753
    Apr 8, 2007
    northern MN
    Apparently there are no latex salespersons among the GOP reps.
     
  12. lacuna

    lacuna The Conscience of Too Hot Moderator VIP Member

    63,335
    3,709
    2,353
    Apr 8, 2007
    Redlands, Colorado
    I agree. It matches with the instruction given in Genesis 1:28 - to have dominion over all the earth, to be fruitful and multiply - that the Christian Dominionists / Nationalists believe grants them the authority to enforce what they believe to be the will of God. And as we have observed on this forum, some will not stop short of that.
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
  13. dynogator

    dynogator VIP Member

    6,373
    318
    418
    Apr 9, 2007
    This isn't just about condoms.

    According to The Wall Street Journal, “The legislation protects access to any contraceptive device, including all contraceptive products approved by the Food and Drug Administration, including intrauterine devices known as IUDs and emergency contraception such as Plan B.”

    Inclusion of IUDs and Plan B is believed to reduce the chance that Republicans in the Senate will support the measure because both of those can terminate a pregnancy within days of conception. And to overcome the filibuster, 10 Republicans would have to agree to it.

    I'm totally in favor of this legislation, but it's more ambitious than just outlawing condoms.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  14. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,553
    2,782
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    There is a semantical game going on there. IUDs have never even been proven to block implantation after fertilization. It’s theoretical but almost certainly doesn’t happen. And this argument only applies if you think “pregnancy” begins at fertilization rather than implantation, a seriously problematic conclusion
     
    Last edited: Jul 24, 2022
  15. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    I have literally never heard a republican mention any issue with Condoms/Birth control.

    Not once in my whole life.

    What are you guys talking about?
     
    • Agree Agree x 4
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  16. ingor7

    ingor7 Premium Member

    78
    25
    1,818
    Dec 9, 2015
    Then why did 195 republican representatives vote against this bill? That is the topic, maybe you can enlighten us.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Like Like x 1
  17. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    Haven't read it, but my guess is it wasn't because of condoms. As is often the case there is likely more stuff in there.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,645
    777
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    ALL CONTRACEPTION
     
    • Like Like x 1
  19. docspor

    docspor GC Hall of Fame

    5,691
    1,819
    3,078
    Nov 30, 2010
    I'd guess ain't none of it the government's bidness. Well, according to us limited gov types.
     
  20. tilly

    tilly Superhero Mod. Fast witted. Bulletproof posts. Moderator VIP Member

    1. Why are you screaming?.
    2. You do understand that they are likely doing this because the bill protects post conception drugs. (You may not be aware, but that isnt condoms.)
    3. You see bills are filled with things and often have one or two sticking points. Thats how politics work. Take the post conception stuff out and "voila" , condoms wont be in jeopardy.

    This... Isnt... About... Condoms.

    It's a political game.