10 year old rape victim can't get abortion in Ohio

Illegals are fox's boogie man and a great way for them to change the narrative. They do it because it works on the mindless viewers that will propagate the spin. Thank god his third cousin doesn't work for the DNC.

Since you are apparently a viewer, do they report the immigration status of everyone that gets arrested for crime? Or conversely, anyone that performs an act of heroism?

 

This bothers you more than he raped someone and that the victim had to seek an abortion in another state because they have a no exceptions law?

 

“two major emotional drives: narcissistic symbiosis and shared psychosis. Narcissistic symbiosis refers to the developmental wounds that make the leader-follower relationship magnetically attractive. The leader, hungry for adulation to compensate for an inner lack of self-worth, projects grandiose omnipotence—while the followers, rendered needy by societal stress or developmental injury, yearn for a parental figure. When such wounded individuals are given positions of power, they arouse similar pathology in the population that creates a “lock and key” relationship.”

The ‘Shared Psychosis’ of Donald Trump and His Loyalists

 

Ohio rebranding to Gilead?

 

I haven't been to the board much in the past two weeks, but just to catch up. For all the claims that the story was false, is it in fact real or not?

 

No time to catch you up on that step, the train left the “fake news” station a while back. We’re at “Rape is overrated” junction now.

 

It was not false, the perpetrator has been arrested and the doctor vilified.

 

I shouldn’t laugh but I couldn’t help it. The way you worded that was pretty funny for an outsider trying to catch up I guess.

 

Damn, they're a gullible bunch.

These media figures discredited a report on a 10-year-old girl needing a medical abortion. There was just an arrest in the case.

 

The story is real.

So is the literal Attorney General of Indiana blaming the rapist who arrived in the US in 2017 on Biden's border policies and threatening to investigate the doctor who treated the child.

 

Yeah, the problem ultimately comes down to how you define danger to a mother's life. They can't define it loosely, because pregnancy raises the possibility that any woman is going to die, which would make their entire law essentially useless. So you have to figure out the threshold where it is just regular pregnancy risk vs. extraordinary risk. And, in this case, you would need to do that without much in the way of medical research, as I doubt too many people have figured out the risk to mother's health of pregnancy in 10 year olds in developed countries.

 

The story was always likely going to be real, few doctors would going to risk their professional reputation to lie about it. Some here just didn’t like it because it made these draconian laws look like we were back in the Middle Ages.
The ironic part though is literally a week before this I posted a story about Brazil forcing an abortion on a 12 year old, and said it was coming here. And here we are, almost instantly.

what the zealots on the Supreme Court didn’t grasp is that changes made incrementally are light years better for the country than massive upheavals like this. Simply throwing out fifty years of precedent on an issue this divisive is terrible for the country, it empowers true believers to push even further (beyond what 90 percent of he country sees as rational) and wrecks faith in institutions on the other side. But none of that matters to the 5 in the bubble who did this. They “won”.

 

Genuinely curious for all the publican dads here, where if a relative of yours was raped, you'd think that was a blessing from God right, and therefore should be carried to term? You're perfectly ok with this?

That's LEGIT what is going on in this country right now, and you're actually worried about who uses the correct bathroom.

 

Got news for them, this is just the beginning of these kind of stories. It'll get worse too.

 

This week my company added a benefit that for any medical procedure not available within 100 miles, they would pay for travel. Sad that it’s come to that, but here we are.

 

All those companies that moved from Cali to Texas might be having second thoughts now. How are you going to recruit employees to a state that bans abortions?

 

I'm more curious on how the state will react to those companies covering travel or providing abortion related benefits, or potentially enforcing their bounty system on corporations

 

Inhuman scum like this should go drink all the kitchen cleaners they can find, ASAP. So should everyone else who agrees with him.

The 10-year-old Ohio girl who crossed state lines to receive an abortion in Indiana should have carried her pregnancy to term and would be required to do so under a model law written for state legislatures considering more restrictive abortion measures, according to the general counsel for the National Right to Life.

Jim Bopp, an Indiana lawyer who authored the model legislation in advance of the Supreme Court’s decision overturning Roe v. Wade, told POLITICO on Thursday that his law only provides exceptions when the pregnant person’s life is in danger.

“She would have had the baby, and as many women who have had babies as a result of rape, we would hope that she would understand the reason and ultimately the benefit of having the child,” Bopp said in a phone interview on Thursday.

National Right to Life official: 10-year-old should have had baby