Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Shooting in Highland Park, Illinois. Near July 4th parade. 6 deaths..

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by RayGator, Jul 4, 2022.

  1. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    I don't believe that 2a limits govt from regulating the commercial sale of guns or regulating guns for militia purposes so I can easily see a "duty" for sellers being imposed, which would not be an end around at all. The idea that 2a prohibits govt from regulating a gun market is not in the constitution. In effect, it's no different than govt's ability to regulate/control the sale and ownership of explosives etc.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  2. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,245
    703
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    Righties are probably more disgusted at him dressing in drag than him killing a bunch of people.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Off-topic Off-topic x 1
  3. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,139
    8,055
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,245
    703
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    Killer looks right at home. Groomed for doom indeed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  5. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    FWIW, I see the challenge as more in the way 2a is poorly worded that gives both the right of the people to keep & bear arms and the purpose being for a militia in defense of country, which the constitution also lays out in a more expansive way in Art 1/Sec 8 than some believe, how govt can regulate that militia.

    This is why, for instance, that pre & post revolutionary common laws about carry (among other laws such as storage laws) were not only widespread but post-revolution, constitutional.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  6. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    2A protects your right to bear arms; it doesn't give gun sellers immunity from civil suits for reasonably foreseeable harm.

    It's the same reason why a restaurant can get dinged for overserving a drunk driver that goes out and kills someone. Or why Section 230 exists via congressional action rather than judicial fiat. Just because you have a right doesn't mean other people can negligently (or knowingly) help you use that right to commit a crime/tort.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  7. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    11,182
    2,509
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    047F144D-D9F2-4D57-9F72-55606D369D32.jpeg
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 4
  8. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,707
    994
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    Trump vs Biden, smdh. Children just go away. Talk about this nut that just took lives and what causes this repeated pattern of assailant traits.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,678
    843
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    Why do you think I’m talking about examining the backround check process itself?

    This guy had all kinds of public social media crazy (just that we know about), and I’m assuming meth or other drugs might be there as well.

    So… how did none of that apparently factor in to keeping this rifle out of his hands? There is no perfect system, but several of these recent young male shooters *legally* getting their hands on rifles have been straight up nutso. The system that allows it is nuts. It should be noted that several of the recent shooters were in their teens, this guy 22, so even shifting the age up to 21 wouldn’t have stopped this particular instance. There really is no one singular solution. It has to be multifaceted.
     
    Last edited: Jul 5, 2022
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Like Like x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  10. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Putting this here. 2 yo found and saved by bystanders. They reunited him with his grandparents. Both his mom and dad weren't as lucky :(

    Dr. Rubin, MD on TikTok
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 2
    • Informative Informative x 1
  11. orangeblue_coop

    orangeblue_coop GC Hall of Fame

    4,245
    703
    2,938
    Nov 19, 2016
    Tragic as heck. This is the new reality for Americans.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. WC53

    WC53 GC Hall of Fame

    4,707
    994
    2,088
    Oct 17, 2015
    Old City
    • Informative Informative x 1
  13. ursidman

    ursidman VIP Member

    13,963
    22,585
    3,348
    Sep 27, 2007
    Bug Tussle NC
    Damn. No words. Instead of thinking of these casualties as sum -7 people killed- we should consider them as 7 x 1.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 4
  14. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,553
    2,782
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    It’s a bit complex. Gun manufacturers have special immunities. I have heard one former industry insider (forget name), talk about the different was guns are advertised after the act, with no fear of litigation using your ads

    The Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act (PLCAA) is a U.S law, passed in 2005, that protects firearms manufacturers and dealers from being held liable when crimes have been committed with their products. Both arms manufacturers and dealers can still be held liable for damages resulting from defective products, breach of contract, criminal misconduct, and other actions for which they are directly responsible. They may also be held liable for negligent entrustment when they have reason to know a gun is intended for use in a crime.

    Protection of Lawful Commerce in Arms Act - Wikipedia
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    Our free state in all its glory.
     
  16. Gator515151

    Gator515151 GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 4, 2007
    I see you and your lefty buddies seem to be somewhat turned on by him dressing in drag you sure seem obsessed with it.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  17. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,507
    940
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    That's just the price the kid has to pay so that some bad a** wannabes get to own weapons of war to look cool.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  18. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,060
    5,221
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    In fantasy land, a guy who wraps himself on a Trump flag and posts far right messages would be considered a leftist. But, we usually see in Too Hot where the fake news right wingers who post elsewhere are going with events. Just Like the capital invaders were Antifa until the invaders became tourists who were invited in. Left or right, I don’t care. I just want to know his motive. And it is really immaterial to brand him one way or another until we know the facts and his motive.
     
  19. Spurffelbow833

    Spurffelbow833 GC Hall of Fame

    9,501
    714
    1,293
    Jan 9, 2009
    It's too soon for liberals to be injecting their idea of redeeming qualities into another senseless act of violence.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. GatorBen

    GatorBen Premium Member

    6,166
    978
    2,968
    Apr 9, 2007
    This seems to be a monumental failure by the Illinois government and his family.

    Either Illinois as a whole, or Highland Park specifically, have nearly every firearms restriction gun control advocates push for, and it sounds like his guns complied with the Highland Park ordinance. Illinois requires a Firearm Owners ID (“FOID”) to buy a gun or ammunition. And Illinois has state-level mental health prohibitions that go well beyond the federal prohibited persons laws (including a requirement that any mental health admission be reported rather than only involuntary commitments, and a requirement to revoke FOIDs upon a report that someone represents a clear and present danger to himself or others).

    He has apparently been determined to be a clear and present danger at least twice previously (once for a suicide attempt, once for threatening to kill his mother with a knife). One of his parents’ homes apparently has a mural of a smiley face character with a rifle painted on the back wall. And his dad sponsored his FOID application (required because he was under 21 at the time) after he had twice already been determined to be a clear and present danger to himself or others. And then his uncle (who lived with them) gave the “we never could have seen this coming” interview.

    This is, if anything, the case that proves gun control laws can’t always prevent this kind of tragedy, because he seems to have somehow managed to skate through all of them. Illinois State Police and his dad are probably both going to (rightly) get their asses sued off for facilitating that, but this doesn’t seem to be one that could have been prevented if only we had more gun control.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1