Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Roe v Wade Overturned

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorGrowl, Jun 24, 2022.

  1. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,380
    14,414
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    A 'thing'?

    *It* is a human being. A specimen of homo sapiens in a tender and vulnerable state of BE-ing.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 2
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  2. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,380
    14,414
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    I couldn't see the post you replied to. Thought it was a stand alone post.

    ...but still not much of a 'correction'.

    Seems like you agreed with the quoted post that also cslled him 'uncle Thomas'.
     
    Last edited: Jun 25, 2022
  3. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,334
    5,905
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Correct. Although, the equal protection sex discrimination arguments were in their infancy at that time. The author of Roe, Harry Blackmun, later embraced the Equal Protection Clause as protecting reproductive rights.
     
  4. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,435
    163,998
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007

    There is this though:

    Unborn Victims of Violence Act - Wikipedia

    The Unborn Victims of Violence Act of 2004 (Public Law 108-212) is a United States law that recognizes an embryo or fetus in utero as a legal victim, if they are injured or killed during the commission of any of over 60 listed federal crimes of violence. The law defines "child in utero" as "a member of the species Homo sapiens, at any stage of development, who is carried in the womb."[1]

    The law is codified in two sections of the United States Code: Title 18, Chapter 1 (Crimes), §1841 (18 USC 1841) and Title 10, Chapter 22 (Uniform Code of Military Justice) §919a (Article 119a). The law applies only to certain offenses over which the United States government has jurisdiction, including certain crimes committed on federal properties, against certain federal officials and employees, and by members of the military. In addition, it covers certain crimes that are defined by statute as federal offenses wherever they occur, no matter who commits them, such as certain crimes of terrorism. Because of principles of federalism embodied in the United States Constitution, federal criminal law does not apply to crimes prosecuted by the individual U.S. states, although 38 states also recognize the fetus or "unborn child" as a crime victim, at least for purposes of homicide or feticide.[2]
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  5. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,334
    5,905
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    The hilarity is that all of these things are actually pro-democracy. :emoji_joy:
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  6. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    123,435
    163,998
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    Perhaps the above law has been repealed, but I didn't see anything about that in the article.
     
  7. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,380
    14,414
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    By shutting down any discussion about the issue and thereby removing it from the public forum.

    (...and most egregiously, by fabricating the grounds for doing so).
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
  8. BULLGATOR

    BULLGATOR Generally unpleasant.

    11,561
    526
    828
    Apr 3, 2007
    Florida
    He is a man who knows his base.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  9. 92gator

    92gator GC Hall of Fame

    14,380
    14,414
    3,363
    Jun 14, 2007
    Barry did that. He's how we got Trump.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  10. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    This seems a silly, thread pulling position. Trump left the White house of his own accord. He didn't have to get physically removed by the police. Did he want to go? Apparently not, but to say that he refused to transfer power is just ignoring the facts as they exist...he left and he didn't have to be forcibly made to do so.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 3
    • Like Like x 1
  11. Gator515151

    Gator515151 GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 4, 2007
    [​IMG]
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  12. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    9,053
    1,707
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. RIP

    RIP I like touchdowns Premium Member

    6,947
    1,976
    3,313
    Feb 2, 2015
    Them damn dems kicking in doors and shooting babies, forcing you to have abortions, etc.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    9,053
    1,707
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well you left the “peaceful” part out. Because he screeched for 90 minutes about the End of Days before the insurrection if the mob he assembled didn’t fight and the VP didn’t own the steal.

    He exhausted every illegal option that was even a hint better than simply absurd. DOJ, AG, VP, GOP Congress, willing cannon fodder citizens, all the RW media, social media, every Qnut, and he still does all those things still available to him today.

    You make it sound like him not demanding a movie plot coup with a military component washes away all the sedition.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  15. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    The basis of the referendum was to allow the restoration of voting rights to felons "who have completed their sentences." If they haven't completed their sentences, then they shouldn't be eligible to have their rights restored....simple as that, and also upheld by the courts. In what way is the will of the ppl being ignored here?
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  16. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,957
    2,430
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    You continue to miss the larger point, so I won’t belabor it.
     
  17. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    No, @Trickster just conflated a simple fact of me stating that he did "transfer" power to all kind of other things. He stated he didn't transfer power, when it is simple fact that in the end Biden was sworn in on time like every other President and Trump walked out of the White House under his own power. Whether he wanted to do all those things or not is immaterial.
     
    • Dislike Dislike x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    9,053
    1,707
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    In the way that you have added to the definition of “sentence” just like scum R’s did to stop it.

    You are going to straight face that “sentence” stance?

    “Say, bro, what type of sentence did you get for that speeding ticket?”
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  19. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    Possibly, but you appear to have missed a very simple, small point.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
  20. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    You meant the part I underlined?