Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

DeSantis vs. Disney

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by dynogator, Apr 13, 2022.

  1. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    Please tell me that this is tongue in cheek and that you don't really believe that the State of FL is going to start operating Disney properties....did I miss an operative post upstream?
     
  2. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,584
    2,830
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Post 1551. Also here. The governor has said that they're going to take over the Reedy Creek Improvement District rather than give it to the counties. It was a bit tongue-in-cheek to say that the state will operate the park and the attractions. Reedy Creek Improvement District technically just takes the place of the county, doing land use decisions, road maintenance, etc. However, when you have one property owner within that district, it's arguably the same thing as operating every aspect of the property. Plus, I haven't looked it up, but I suspect, that some aspect of park revenues are pledged as part of the bond issue. It's very complex, and I'm a researched it completely.

    The reference to the attractions was a bit of a joke. But the governor has definitely stated that the state is going to take over the property as a whole. I don't know how serious he is about it, but that is what he said
     
    Last edited: May 17, 2022
  3. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    The State of Florida is, according to DeSantis, take over the Reedy Creek special district, not the Disney properties. by law, the County where the district is situated takes over the district upon the district’s dissolution. DeSantis, to cure the billion dollars in debt that must be absorbed, announced the State will take over the District to avoid any tax burdens on the residents.


    DeSantis: State will likely take over Disney’s Reedy Creek
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  4. Crusher

    Crusher GC Hall of Fame

    6,010
    1,374
    2,143
    Apr 19, 2007
    Got it....sometimes sarcasm is lost in a Message board. One would think that there is a clear difference between "public" Reedy Creek property (Fire stations, roads, would be an example) and the private property of the Disney Corporation.
     
    • Optimistic Optimistic x 1
  5. G8R92

    G8R92 GC Hall of Fame

    3,239
    350
    353
    Feb 5, 2010
    Having had my own personal issues with DMV, DEO and DACS, I know firsthand that the State of Florida can't even run their own Departments. How are they going to run the RCID?
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  6. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,808
    1,354
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    A state take-over of a competently run quasi-business entity because Hugo DeSantis thinks the state can profit off it.

    And this is the #2 Republican/Conservative candidate running plays from Communist playbook.
     
    • Winner Winner x 3
  7. ncargat1

    ncargat1 VIP Member

    14,454
    6,318
    3,353
    Dec 11, 2009
    How does this remove the tax burden? It simply spreads it out over all the residence of the state rather than just 2 counties.
     
    • Agree Agree x 9
  8. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,265
    5,270
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Well, they are keeping socialism out of the state.
     
  9. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,336
    5,910
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    That's exactly correct lol.
     
  10. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,543
    917
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    I'm not sure if the DeSantis faithful really care.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  11. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,584
    2,830
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    What he’s saying is that the state will take over being the local government, do the roads, fire, etc., and tax Disney to pay the bonds, omitting a third party (the bond holders) and law
     
  12. G8tas

    G8tas GC Hall of Fame

    4,543
    917
    453
    Sep 22, 2008
    Disney gets to keep their $500 million tax incentives. The whole thing is strange
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  13. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,808
    1,354
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    2022 ... Disney runs Reedy Creek like a business and takes financial responsibility for their infrastructure improvements and maintenance with little burden on tax payers.

    2023 ... Reedy Creek is run by incompetent state bureaucrats, and Disney gets to keep its massive tax breaks, and the burden of those infrastructure improvements and maintenance that solely benefits Disney will pass to all Florida tax payers.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    17,336
    5,910
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Putting aside legalities, I'm not sure how that would work without affecting the state's coffers.
     
  15. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    It reduces who pays the tax burden, not the tax burden. And, the real reason for this extraordinary measure is to ensure Disney has to get all approvals to develop FROM STATE CONTROLLED land use agencies, rather than Disney-friendly municipal agencies. DeSantis can further his retribution by effectively stopping all Disney development. This is insidious.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  16. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    It will be interesting to see if they open a new location in the US, or start aggressively funding democrat politicians. Florida loses in either scenario.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    But DeSantis will he cheered by deSantites for “standing up to family hating California Company”
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,584
    2,830
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Me neither. None of it makes sense. There is literally no model that I am aware of for the State taking over routine county government tasks. Here's a link to Hillsborough County departments. Plenty will obviously be inapplicable here, but many will. And obviously what is unique about one landowner with theme parks art of the largest entertainment industry on earth, international in scope, means there is no template, very unique nonstandard needs. Nothing close. They can try to just graft on to RCID, but that's not really going to work, as RCID is integrated with WDW and the company as a whole. I still suspect the bond covenants somehow link into company revenues as security. No way bondholders would simply depend on RCID's internal arbitrary "taxing" against properties.

    Departments
     
    • Informative Informative x 1
  19. tampagtr

    tampagtr VIP Member

    17,584
    2,830
    1,618
    Apr 3, 2007
    Looks like these statements are more than just political posturing. They are being used to dismiss taxpayer lawsuits on standing grounds. He wants to make Disney sue itself so he can demagogue. And given who political and unprincipled a lot recent appointees are, he might get a favorable decision even though is plainly wrong legally.

    Bryan Griffin, a spokesman for the governor, said Tuesday that he could not comment on pending litigation but referred to another portion of Judge Altonaga's order in which she pointed out that S.B. 4-C will not itself raise the plaintiffs' taxes and said they cannot invoke the federal court's jurisdiction based on an alleged injury that is so "indirect and highly speculative."

    Griffin also cited previous public comments from DeSantis in which he assured residents that the new law will not affect Florida taxpayers and that Disney will have to pay more taxes and take care of its outstanding debt.

    Fla. Taxpayers Renew Challenge Over Nixed Disney District - Law360
     
  20. ajoseph

    ajoseph Premium Member

    7,075
    2,607
    2,998
    Jan 15, 2008
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1