Oh ... Okay ... now he's sure that his anonymous data is all democrats and Trump would have won ... what a clown. Meanwhile, I've yet to see any evidence that: (a) anything actually happened other than someone supposedly found data that shows some people passed by some places. (b) if something did happen, which party was involved (c) that any ballots were illegitimate or delivered illegally, (d) that any election outcomes would have changed.
LOL! Yeah....these ppl are just pass'n through, whistl'n Dixie....(and I guess getting their Christmas cards out...and taking pix of themselves, in case their Christmas cards got lost in the mail, they can txt mom to show her they actually did put it in the mail....).
Again, near as I can tell, those are all different people at the drop box. Do you have any video that shows the same person at the drop box 10 different times? Because that is what the claim is.
Wow, you just proved that 9 people deposited multiple ballots ... something that is legal most states, especially if it's for family or home bound people. I mean, there are literally laws that allow for what is shown in your 5 second clip. There were 158 million votes cast, so I'm willing to bet at least 9 people took advantage of those laws. Probably even more. A lot more. Now prove they were illegal votes. Or illegally delivered. Or they were all democrats. Or they all voted for Biden. Or would have changed the election.
I’ve read this multiple times and I cannot understand what point you’re trying to get across, other than a parroted position of the Trumpeteers.
Can't you see? Trump lost BECAUSE REASONS!!!! You clearly aren't watching Alex Jones or the Pillow Guy or you would understand all this!
Nobody confronted this guy you speak of. I'll grant there are names associated with phone ID's. It takes a warrant to get he names. The people who did the analysis are not law enforcement.
Fair enough, it was in the section of the article debunking the mule myth just before the part where the Georgia SOS says he looked into some Of True the Votes claims and dismissed them. My bad for conflating that. But, FWIW, John Oliver just did a segment on how “anonymous” geo tracking data that is sold isn’t really that anonymous since they can pretty much tell where you live and work in most cases, so if they wanted to find these people and confront them, they probably could have…. But learning, “yeah, there is a new Starbucks near that ballot box that people started going to” wouldn’t have made a good film for the suckers.
Strange that all these “Mules” dropped all these fraudulent ballots in boxes, but the votes matched the voter rolls in the audits; or there were not widespread claims by voters that they showed up to vote but were denied for already having case ballots; or these was no evidence of multiple votes by the same person. The “Mules” somehow managed to know who was going to vote and cast their votes for them anyway. How did they pull that off?
Yeah, I mentioned the same thing upthread, True the Vote claims 100s of thousand illegal votes cast using other people’s legitimate ballots, but I’ve never heard of a single case of someone claiming their ballot was stolen by an unknown person and an illegal vote cast in their name. It may happen rarely, and is mostly family members that get caught casting forged votes, but not the tune of 100s of thousands… and not strangers taking them. It would be like me claiming that cell phone data suggests republicans stole millions of yard gnomes during the month of October … but no one seems to be missing any yard gnomes….
They claim too and it’s on them to prove it. If the authorities won’t take it and run with it, they would be smart to release it all to the public. Apparently they plan to release more to the public soon. I guess time will tell.
Not going to watch it, but this is a review from a level headed MAGA on another board. Finally got around to watching this. For starters, the idea that there were tons of people who were going between nonprofit groups and then 20-30 drop boxes is incredibly suspicious. Not sure of a viable explanation other than ballot harvesting. My problem with the documentary comes when they expand the claim from “people were illegally conducted ballot harvesting in these states” to “every swing state was flipped from Trump to Biden via illegal votes.” Even if you take the ballot harvesting claims and geolocation data at face value, that doesn’t mean every vote was an illegal vote. There’s a difference between an illegally collected vote and an illegally cast vote. The possibility of voter fraud isn’t proof of voter fraud. Proof of horrible, possibly illegal voter procedure? Yes. Proof of voter fraud? No. No idea why they didn’t name the nonprofits allegedly deploying the ballot mules. Make the mules while you’re at it. Knowing who we’re actually talking about would be helpful. Also, they have surveillance footage of the dropboxes but don’t show any video of one person dropping of ballots at multiple locations, which would remove all doubt. Also, why only look at data from the swing states? I need to see a comparison between the geolocation data in the swing states and states like Alabama and California. If the same pattern holds in deeply partisan states, then that kinda destroys the premise. Documentary is interesting, the data presenting is incredibly suspicious, but there’s no firm proof here that illegally cast ballots changed the electoral outcome.
“Also, they have surveillance footage of the dropboxes but don’t show any video of one person dropping of ballots at multiple locations, which would remove all doubt.” Well that’s an interesting tidbit and goes against what others are saying is shown…
Maybe one of the posters who claim the film is making valid claims can explain how the fraudsters cast votes in the names of 400,000 registered voters and not a single voter noticed. Not a single one tried to vote and was told he’d already voted. Not a single one was flagged for voting twice. not one in 400,000. Anyone?
This thread is about 24 pages too long, lol. Even OAN and Fox won’t promote because they know it’s BS and will get sued yet again.
With enough leg work I'm sure you could doxx people. I can understand not doing so for legitimate reasons. Presenting a case without a warrant or legitimate investigation does an inordinate amount of damage to presenting the case. As for the new Starbucks on the corner the parameters used for analysis of the data is what makes this a compelling argument. Where it goes from here remains to be determined.
I'm still waiting for any logical explanation that Dems flipped the election from Trump to Biden with illegal voting but didn't bother to gain seats in the House or secure 60 seats in the Senate.
