Has he even watched the film yet? When I last checked in to this thread he hadn’t even taken the time to watch what he told us we should all be afraid of.
I suggested it was more than mere coincidence that the uniquely historic leak of a monumental SCOTUS opinion occured when it did--hours b4 the release of 2000 mules--bc i dont believe in the coinkydinky fairy, unlike y'all. Professionally prepared signs spontaneously manifesting out of the fog futher duffests more than coinkydinky. I refrained from speculating on the who what or why, beyond the liklihood that the timing was calculatrd to divert from the movie release if not bury it. Check under your pillow...i hear fairies like to leave money there.
No, not yet. Kids n work keeping me running (i can post n work m take kids around at the same time...takes an act of congress for me to steal away for a 3 hour bllock of time...).
Lots of other things were happening around the time the leak happened, yet you seem to find those things coincidental to its release
Seems like a convenient excuse for this film coming out and nobody giving a shit about it - because its the same crack pot tinfoil shit y'all have been falling for for over a year now. You sound like a crazy person.
Do you expect anything new that wasn't in his book? Actually, what would you say is the key evidence that D'Souza's book produced?
You should send trump all your worldly wealth to help him get the word out about this subterfuge calculated to resemble a coincidence. A real patriot would help.
The book hasn't come out yet--set for release in October of this year, so naturally I haven't read it (and probably won't)--rather watch the movie, where he presumably lays the case out. Maybe I'll read the book if I'm sufficiently compelled after the movie. But as alluded to above, they took geo-spatial cell. phone records and cross referenced those with video surveillance of drop boxes....and apparently found 2,000 matches making multiple drops.
D’Souza is the ultimate example of someone smart enough to realize that if you tell people what they want to hear, true or not, you can make a ton of money off it. In a weird sort of way I kind of respect it.
I'm not interested in what he says, nearly as much as I'm interested in what he can show. The claim is 2,000 matches (cel ph recs and vid surveillance of drop boxes) of ppl hitting those ballot boxes repeatedly. 2,000 coincidences? I think I'll watch the case he presents, weigh the evidence, then render my verdict.
Your choice, and if there’s something legitimately compelling, and verifiable by a third party let us know. But this is a man who is hyper partisan and already convicted of fraud. Given his background there’s a remarkably high threshold he has to clear to be taken seriously, and the odds that he is the one who cracked the case when actual experts can’t seem to, is close to zero. Which is why I won’t waste my time on it. But again, give us something from the doc that is or can be verified by a credible third party and I will happily listen to the argument.
D’Souza is an nut job right wing conspiracy theorist who makes all kinds of wing bat movies about any left wing politician he doesn’t like. His movie about Obama was laughable and a joke. https://www.usnews.com/news/politic...s-in-the-claim-of-2k-ballot-mules?context=amp The AP also says his theory is full of holes and that he’s crazy, but I’m sure the associated press is fake news, too. Lol.
If one hasn’t examined what was to be shown, aren’t you still going by what was said….. Believing a fraudster is like believing the check is in the mail or the chip in the vaccine
