Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Draft Alito opinion leaked overturning Roe

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by tampagtr, May 2, 2022.

  1. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    You are not the Supreme Court. Some justices agree with you, some disagree with you.
     
  2. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,588
    1,351
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    Ms Lippy’s car is green.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    How is it not?
     
  4. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,378
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Good to know. That must mean that you believe the government could imprison you for not getting vaccinated or could forcibly sterilize you for being a Republican.
     
    • Winner Winner x 4
  5. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    No, some rulings are good, some are bad.

    If you had the caveat of, "a majority of justices on the Supreme Court disagree with me," I would not have given you grief. Granted, that line of argument despite being more indicative of reality, is not nearly as persuasive.;)
     
  6. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    Of course not. Republicans are doing that for them.
     
  7. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
     
  8. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,378
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    That's not an answer.
     
  9. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    Question - if a Justice lied during their confirmation hearing, can they be disciplined/removed?
     
  10. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    You want an answer to those questions... start another thread, maybe I'll respond. This is about Roe v. Wade, and the "right to control your body" that you brought up. This does not encompass every single due process issue, nor does it have to.
     
  11. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,378
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Practically speaking, no. They could be impeached, but the Republicans aren't going to vote to remote them. They could be charged with a crime, but that doesn't remove them from the Court. And proving that crime would be extremely difficult. Plus, we all knew that people like Alito, Kavanaugh, and Gorsuch were lying.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  12. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    Is it possible? Yes. Will it ever happen? No.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  14. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,378
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    My questions pertain to that exact right. If you think it exists to protect you in those instances, then it exists to protect pregnant women. The debate then becomes about the other side of the equation. We need to first establish whether we agree on that right existing.
     
  15. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    I just didn't know if there was even a process/precedent. It should happen frankly. To show them they're accountable for what they promise & say in their hearings.
     
  16. MaceoP

    MaceoP GC Hall of Fame

    3,114
    448
    388
    Apr 3, 2007
    I believe that the leak of this document can give hints as to where the court is currently. I think the analysis I read that makes sense is the conservative wing leaked this to prevent Roberts from flipping Cavanaugh and Barrett on overturning Roe. I think a partial reversal of roe was n the cards so this leak was preemptive
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  17. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    Ideally. But ultimately people are placed on the Supreme Court for the outcomes they deliver, not their integrity.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. Gator715

    Gator715 GC Hall of Fame

    6,848
    835
    2,103
    Dec 6, 2015
    Whataboutism.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 2
  19. GatorRade

    GatorRade Rad Scientist

    8,557
    1,588
    1,478
    Apr 3, 2007
    You are still the one deciding that independence is a prerequisite for life that should be protected. And you are defining “independent.” In a way, nothing is really independent life. Animals can’t live without plants. Plants can’t live without bacteria. Males and females can’t make babies without each other.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. gator_lawyer

    gator_lawyer VIP Member

    16,378
    5,614
    3,213
    Oct 30, 2017
    Another deflection to avoid answering the questions.