Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Hi there... Can you please quickly check to make sure your email address is up to date here? Just in case we need to reach out to you or you lose your password. Muchero thanks!

Draft Alito opinion leaked overturning Roe

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by tampagtr, May 2, 2022.

  1. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,520
    942
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    This crazy ruling states that only rights "deeply rooted" in the Constitution really exist. Those particular rights apply to white men only.

    Also, every justice that said Roe was settled law in their confirmation hearings should be impeached and removed.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,290
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    I really doubt anyone is going to punish Alito for leaking his own opinion.
     
  3. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,290
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    Where are all the folks who said I was being dramatic that these judges would overturn Roe with zero reservation?

    Their whole purpose on the court is to legislate Republican policy goals.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. GatorNorth

    GatorNorth Premium Member Premium Member

    17,402
    8,139
    3,203
    Apr 3, 2007
    Atlanta
    The draft opinion is too large for me to link but the first full paragraph on P5 of it reads as an open invitation to states to ban things like contraception, gay marriage, interracial marriage, etc.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  5. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,303
    785
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    Don’t forget this little slip. And yes, I know he tried to walk it back, but be honest. This is what he meant. We are on the verge of Taliban status.

     
    • Informative Informative x 1
    • Wish I would have said that Wish I would have said that x 1
  6. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,680
    5,386
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Just the first step in eliminating substantive due process rights applied to states. A whole bunch of rights are going to be restricted.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
    • Winner Winner x 2
  7. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,680
    5,386
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    So, states will be absolutely free now to ban abortions for women whose lives are in danger.
     
  8. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,680
    5,386
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    True the leak should not have happened. But we would know this by early July anyway. So, it isn’t about the leak.
     
  9. gogator7444

    gogator7444 GC Hall of Fame

    3,051
    939
    1,858
    Nov 24, 2021
    Buffalo NY
    As if country wasn't divided enough there will likely be specific areas that are "safe" and others where there will be a large number of men wondering why there aren't enough women to go around. And they'll get a brain drain of professionals especially women who would rather live in the US and not something resembling a Taliban stronghold.

    Good luck getting doctors, lawyers, engineers, etc to move to places that outright ban abortion, contraceptives, etc. Oh there will always be some, but like Russia, watch the brain drain of people choosing freedom.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  10. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,520
    942
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    They need the focus to be on the process story so the subject gets buried.
     
  11. slocala

    slocala VIP Member

    3,303
    785
    2,028
    Jan 11, 2009
    4 men + 1 handsmaid
    Perfect ratio for the Taliban.
     
  12. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    124,071
    164,221
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    You mentioned the leak was from Alito and another poster said the leak was from Breyer. That's 2 so far.
     
  13. gatorchamps960608

    gatorchamps960608 GC Hall of Fame

    4,520
    942
    2,463
    Jul 4, 2020
    I've seen speculation that it was someone from Roberts' office.
     
  14. jjgator55

    jjgator55 VIP Member

    6,198
    1,765
    2,043
    Apr 3, 2007
    I hope it’s with votes and not with guns.
     
  15. BigCypressGator1981

    BigCypressGator1981 GC Hall of Fame

    6,707
    1,374
    3,103
    Oct 11, 2011
    This is the only answer now.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. BLING

    BLING GC Hall of Fame

    8,948
    882
    2,843
    Apr 16, 2007
    They already know the votes, which is why this is a “majority” opinion.

    Can this change? Sure. That’s what a “draft” means, the exact wording is certain to have already changed. But the positions of each justice are not as likely to change 180*. Maybe it’s Roberts floating this out there to try and influence someone else to flip and preserve precedent, “preserving the integrity of the court” and all that.
     
  17. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Whatever the case the fact that we are trying to be mind-readers and figure out the why's of the internal machinations of an unelected, anti-democratic institution is a sad state of affairs in a country that prides itself on being "free."
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
  18. g8trdoc

    g8trdoc Premium Member

    3,596
    500
    383
    Apr 3, 2007
    Now we get to learn from Democrats that extremism means letting the public vote on things not in the constitution. The horror!!!!
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  19. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Its America, its always both here
     
  20. wgbgator

    wgbgator Premium Member

    30,267
    1,911
    2,218
    Apr 19, 2007
    Oh word, is there going to be a national referendum on legalizing abortion in this country? Because otherwise, what the hell are you talking about?
     
    • Winner Winner x 3