Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

UPDATE: Ahmaud Arbery's 3 murderers all found guilty. Sentenced to LIFE in prison.

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by orangeblue_coop, May 5, 2020.

  1. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,768
    1,060
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    This is true; certainty of being caught and convicted are far more effective deterrents. That being said, severity of sentence plays a role. Could you imagine what kind of message something like a deferred sentence with probation would send?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  2. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,847
    2,398
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Yep, BUT, it's notoriously difficult to determine who did not commit a crime because of fear of punishment. I also think the message isn't always deterrent as much as it is reassurance to society that those who commit crimes will get their just desserts.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. PerSeGator

    PerSeGator GC Hall of Fame

    2,289
    366
    1,993
    Jun 14, 2014
    Consistent ultra low sentences for serious crimes would probably have an effect to some extent. But I'm skeptical we would see any increase in crime if we, for example, halved sentences across the board. Might even see crime go down as people spend less time in the prison crime training grounds.
     
    • Like Like x 1
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  4. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    I'm not a fan of life sentences for any of them for reasons you already know, but def agree with the idea that a stiff sentence can be a deterrent, one for yahoos like these guys who appoint themselves vigilantes, though not for those regularly involved in crime.

    Might be a wake up call for the wannabe enforcers.
     
  5. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL
    Yep. We agree to disagree on the first point.
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  6. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    Gotta be consistent. :D
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  7. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    8,913
    1,665
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    Deterrent sentencing policies are for rational people. Most outrageous crimes are committed by people who are not rational at the moment.
     
    • Agree Agree x 2
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  8. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL
    You might want to be clear that you mean general deterrent. Because I guarantee you that life without parole is a heck of a good specific deterrent even among the irrational.
     
  9. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    8,913
    1,665
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    How? Is it a definitionally rational concept.

    Why would anyone choose that?
     
  10. g8rjd

    g8rjd GC Hall of Fame

    7,743
    648
    1,193
    Jan 20, 2008
    Tallahassee, FL
    Specific deterrent means deterring the particular offender that committed the offense from committing another. So the only specific deterent that is more effective than life in prison is death. The latter hasn’t resulted in a reoffender yet. ;)
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  11. Emmitto

    Emmitto VIP Member

    8,913
    1,665
    933
    Apr 3, 2007
    Well that’s a qualifier I suppose I wasn’t considering. I might agree with that take.

    I did indeed mean the generic.

    A dude already jammed might now be baby-shaked into reason.
     
    Last edited: Jan 8, 2022
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
  12. demosthenes

    demosthenes Premium Member

    8,768
    1,060
    3,218
    Apr 3, 2007
    I agree with all that. My only point was that while there are other factors that are certainly more important than severity of punishment it doesn’t mean we can “ignore” it either.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  13. kygator

    kygator GC Hall of Fame

    3,073
    142
    348
    Apr 3, 2007
    The crazy part is someone watched the video and decided not to arrest them. They chased an unarmed man while they are armed. The man did what most would have done under the same circumstance, he tried to get away. Once he is in a position that getting away isn’t possible, he did what any reasonable person would have done. He tried to defend himself. I think the liberals on this board are sometimes too quick to blame racism but this one is obvious. No way there isn’t an arrest if this happened to a white guy killed by 3 black guys chasing him under these circumstances.
     
    • Agree Agree x 3
  14. NavyGator93

    NavyGator93 GC Hall of Fame

    1,960
    756
    2,663
    Dec 4, 2015
    Georgia
    I don't have the energy to go back in the thread to see who suggested Arberry was the aggressor, but I can take a pretty good guess without even looking.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  15. Trickster

    Trickster VIP Member

    9,847
    2,398
    3,233
    Sep 20, 2014
    Excellent point. Most crimes are of passion or spur of the moment, I would think.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  16. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,694
    1,339
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Atbury’s murderer is now facing a federal hate crimes trial, and to no one’s surprise, it turns out he is a prolific racist. The jury was read numerous racist texts and facebooks messages, as well as him showing support for vigilantism, and sharing a hateful song written by a white supremacist…

    Arbery killer shared racist messages, white supremacist song with friends
     
    • Informative Informative x 2
  17. OklahomaGator

    OklahomaGator Jedi Administrator Moderator VIP Member

    122,899
    163,818
    116,973
    Apr 3, 2007
    If someone already has a sentence of "life in prison" why do we waste the time and money retrying them on federal charges?

    Well, I just thought of a reason, some governor in the future could pardon them on the state crimes, but they would still have the federal sentence hanging over them.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  18. mutz87

    mutz87 p=.06 VIP Member

    38,229
    33,866
    4,211
    Aug 30, 2014
    I'm not a fan of bringing federal charges when people were already convicted at the state level (I also have some uneasiness when they're not tried or not convicted at the state level) even if there is an argument to be made that they violated federal laws too thus making the vulnerable to federal prosecution. But this to me is akin to trying people for what are essentially the same acts, just sliced differently.

    It rubs me the wrong way.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  19. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,790
    2,036
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Also, I am sure the state trial will be appealed. He probably loses it, but they probably view it as best to make sure.
     
    • Like Like x 1
  20. WarDamnGator

    WarDamnGator GC Hall of Fame

    10,694
    1,339
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    • Informative Informative x 1