Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Ah, when proven that study is useless, now you say every study outside a lab is useless as well. Good one. One can’t ascertain what contributed to the very small increase in efficacy. I know everyone wants to point to masks since this is a lot of people’s religion, but unfortunately that isn’t able to be done with this “study” without taking huge leaps of faith.
     
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  2. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    Who’s moving goalposts. With how unreliable PCR tests are, there are two things to count, hospitalizations and deaths. So, when one area is getting hit with a wave of delta, it’s not exactly a fair comparison to do a short time period of comparison. But you know that already and just wanted to point out the difference for political purposes.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  3. vaxcardinal

    vaxcardinal GC Hall of Fame

    6,860
    1,036
    2,043
    Apr 8, 2007
    Or maybe wait until autumn
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  4. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,509
    1,724
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Then you know that the problem with including death rates from the first few weeks of the pandemic is that we didn't know how to treat it and only a handful of states were seeing an uptick in those early days. Yet you still do it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  5. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,509
    1,724
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    You misread, again. He didn't say those studies are useless, he said those studies have limitations. There is a meaningful difference.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,471
    1,970
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Uh, no, the study has not been proven useless. It has been proven to have a different result than you like. There is an important difference to most of us.

    There was no increase in efficacy, whatever that means in this case. There was a decrease in infection rates and changes in behavior.

    There is a tradeoff in every study. Lab studies are highly controlled, letting you isolate the mechanism perfectly. The downside is that they might not be externally valid outside of all of the controls.

    Natural experiments, such as this study, are externally valid and show the effects of a treatment in a real world setting, but don't isolate mechanisms as well as lab studies. That is true for the Danish mask study as well, which can't definitely rule out a ton of counter explanations to their results, as the author's correctly pointed out in the text of that study. You ignored that because you liked what you could spin their results to be (despite the fact that the author's explicitly disputed your spin on their results in the paper). You attempt to isolate mechanisms through appropriate randomization (which it appears these authors did) and try to use statistical controls for things that can't be randomized away (which these authors also did by finding gaps that continued to exist after the randomization and controlling for them).

    Observational studies limit observation bias, which exists whenever participants know they are being observed, but generally can only provide associations, not causal results. At best, you can create a synthetic control of some form, but there are weaknesses inherent in this. But for the most part, it is difficult to apply the results beyond association.

    At this point, we now have lab studies showing masks are effective at containing particles, which makes them effective at slowing the spread of disease, a natural experiment showing that increased mask usage, especially for more effective masks like surgical masks (there should be no gap due to masking effectiveness if masks weren't the cause), is effective at slowing spread at a community level, and a variety of observational studies showing that mask wearing is associated with slower spread. That is all science can do. Provide three different views, each with unique strengths and weaknesses, answering the same question in the same way: masks lower spread rates. Sorry that the results didn't turn out how you thought they would.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
    • Winner Winner x 4
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Best Post Ever Best Post Ever x 1
  7. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,383
    740
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    Unh, I noticed that also. But I’ve stopped reading mos5 his posts. So much inaccurate info - too little time in the day for me to waste it like that.
     
    Last edited: Sep 4, 2021
    • Agree Agree x 1
  8. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,383
    740
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    the hell it is. You obviously don’t know anything about long haulers. Or anyone that’s been in the icu. Or anyone working in hospitals. Or know anything about others attempting medical procedures. Or anything on costs of treating Covid.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  9. PITBOSS

    PITBOSS GC Hall of Fame

    7,383
    740
    558
    Apr 13, 2007
    link?
     
  10. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,509
    1,724
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    This amused me today.

    [​IMG]
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  11. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,509
    1,724
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    'Is this my life now?': Clemson defensive end Justin Foster's -- and my -- struggle with long-haul COVID

    Happy ending for his story, he got the vaccine and his body has recovered enough that he is able to play football again. Still has a lot of weird stuff going on that the doctors can't fully explain, but life is like that sometimes.
     
    • Friendly Friendly x 1
  12. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007



    We knew how to handle it. We saw what happened in Italy. Can’t help it if Cuomo sent sick elderly patients back to nursing homes and then hid the data. Yeah. One thing DeSantis did right was lock down nursing homes and not let Covid+ patients back in there. That the other northern states followed suit is on them. Stupid. But hey, keep making it political. Not surprised.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  13. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    I know you desperately want to be right about something, so I guess the only way is to take a “study” and draw some conclusions even though there are multiple things in play. I guess being wrong on lockdowns, school closures and masks has you wishing for answers that aren’t there. Maybe next time.
     
    • Funny Funny x 2
  14. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007
    long haulers LOL. Already showed that is garbage as well. Maybe we should mask kids under 2. Maybe that will help LOL.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
  15. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,509
    1,724
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Textbook projection. Replies to a post that isn't political, makes political comments, then accuses the original post of being political.
     
    • Winner Winner x 2
  16. citygator

    citygator VIP Member

    10,484
    2,334
    3,303
    Apr 3, 2007
    Charlotte
    I’ve skipped a few pages at times so not sure if discussed. Anyone mixing vaccine producers? Heard a person on CNN say it was fine. I am 2 in on Pfizer. Had not considered getting a different one for the third.
     
  17. mdgator05

    mdgator05 Premium Member

    15,471
    1,970
    1,718
    Dec 9, 2010
    Lol, take the L. You and your favorite twitter accounts were wrong on masks. The research shows it. You wanted an RCT using real world data. Now you have it. Deal with it. Sorry. Better luck next time.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  18. dangolegators

    dangolegators GC Hall of Fame

    Apr 26, 2007
    Total nonsense. NY shut down within a couple of weeks of the first covid cases reported there. But even then it was too late as covid was already entrenched in the population. If you look at the numbers from May 2020 on, NY has done vastly better than Florida has.

    As for the nursing home stuff, it was a mistake for Cuomo to send covid patients back to the nursing homes, but there was no room at the hospitals. At least NY is now requiring nursing home employees to be vaccinated. Why won't DeSantis do that? Why would anyone allow someone who is not vaccinated to work at a nursing home?
     
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
  19. buckeyegator

    buckeyegator Premium Member

    73,145
    1,930
    3,883
    Oct 29, 2007
    gainesville, florida
    So ny shut the barn door after the horses left,big deal, cuomo's damage was done.
     
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  20. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,249
    772
    2,013
    Apr 3, 2007

    What’s political? That some governors stupid decision to send Covid+ patients back to nursing homes? If DeSantis did it I’d call him out for being stupid. Keep playing politics. I’ll pass
     
    • Funny Funny x 1