Welcome home, fellow Gator.

The Gator Nation's oldest and most active insider community
Join today!
  1. Gator Country Black Friday special!

    Now's a great time to join or renew and get $20 off your annual VIP subscription! LIMITED QUANTITIES -- for details click here.

Coronavirus in the United States - news and thoughts

Discussion in 'Too Hot for Swamp Gas' started by GatorNorth, Feb 25, 2020.

  1. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,274
    5,273
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Another study that masks work. Linked is the release from the CDC website. CDC Says to wear masks indoors except when at home.
    Coronavirus Disease 2019 Since the election, it looks like the CDC doesn’t care about Trump’s agenda.
     
    • Like Like x 2
    • Informative Informative x 2
    • Come On Man Come On Man x 1
  2. pkaib01

    pkaib01 GC Hall of Fame

    3,814
    808
    2,063
    Apr 3, 2007
    Don't be a child. If you have a different consideration set on whom could use the 'morning after pill' most, just state it. After all these years, I'm still not sure if you are unwilling or incapable of constructive dialog.

    Despite the fact you didn't have the courtesy of asking me why I think hotspots could use it the most, I'll tell you. Hospital capacity is correlated with population. The per capita of cases in the "hot states" are 2 to 4 times more than some of coastal states. Therefore, those areas are the most at risk of overwhelmed hospitals and rationed care. Which leads to greater death rates for covid and other medical emergencies in the area. So it seems that applying a limited resource, like this pill, would be best served there. And that's just my opinion. The medical professionals on this board may have different view.

    Why do you think people in hotspots need it less than coastal areas?
     
    Last edited: Dec 5, 2020
    • Winner Winner x 2
  3. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    2,686
    839
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    They are thieves. That’s why they mask up 24/7.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
  4. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,778
    860
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    I see no one cares about the largest RCT study on masks. That doesn’t fit the narrative so let’s just not talk about the elephant in the room...
     
  5. gators81

    gators81 Premium Member

    7,993
    661
    468
    Apr 8, 2007
    atlanta
    No, no I don’t care. As I’ve pointed out numerous times, every anti mask study uses terms like “marginally effective” or “not as effective as believed”. You interpret that as a waste of time, I interpret those phrases as “better than nothing”. No ones believes they’re 100% effective, but no barrier cannot possibly be more effective than any barrier, regardless of what you choose to believe. I will continue wearing the mask because it’s easy and stupid not to, I do not care what studies you post. I’ll opt for the more effective option even if only marginal or less than originally believed. It’s still better than nothing no matter how you spin it.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Disagree Bacon! Disagree Bacon! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  6. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,778
    860
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007

    No spin. Just look at the facts. I know the facts suck for the pro mask people but that’s the way it is. And I love the “I don’t believe in science” rhetoric from the Coronabros. It’s funny and sad at the same time.

    Danish study finds face masks provide limited protection to wearer


    And now we have Biden pushing 100 days of mask wearing like that will work LOL. Lemmings!
     
  7. gators81

    gators81 Premium Member

    7,993
    661
    468
    Apr 8, 2007
    atlanta
    I’m not wasting my time clicking the link because the title proves my point. Is “LIMITED” greater than none? If yes, wear a damn mask, if not, go back to elementary school. Thanks for playing.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  8. LouisvilleGator

    LouisvilleGator GC Hall of Fame

    1,180
    189
    1,933
    Oct 16, 2012
    Of course it will work, because by then, over half the population (at least) will have been vaccinated. The vaccine is coming, in like a week. They're not going to reject Pfizer's application. And so once front line workers, elderly have been vaccinated up, the general population will be and all this will happen fairly rapidly. A 100 days into Biden's administration puts us at May 1st (roughly), 2021. So the vaccine will have had 5 and a half months to be distributed to the public by then. That's why Biden is saying 100 days. He could have just left the days part open, but he's carving out a way to take credit for something that is utterly meaningless. Anyone who's refusing to wear a mask today isn't going to start wearing one just because Joe Biden asked them to, lol. And again (I know you know all of this by the way, so this post is not directed at you @gator95), it's not as if a majority of the American public aren't already wearing masks. They are and they don't work, hence the explosion in new cases numbers that shows no signs of abating.
     
  9. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,778
    860
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007

    LOL, The “I’m taking my ball and going home” routine. Thanks for admitting defeat. About as easy as the UT game will be today.
     
  10. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,778
    860
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007

    Yep. It’s just for show. Its theater. But don’t worry, the masks work crowd will be along shortly to show “models” that show they work and ignore the largest RCT study to date on mask effectiveness.
     
  11. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    This study looks at the effectiveness of cloth masks at preventing the wearer from becoming infected. The benefit of cloth masks is that it limits the spread of airborne viruses from those who are sick. When the virus leaves a host, it is attached to a water droplet which is large enough to be stopped by a cloth mask. When the water droplet evaporates the airborne virus is too small to be stopped by a cloth mask.

    My mask protects you, your mask protects me. Love your neighbor, wear a mask.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  12. gators81

    gators81 Premium Member

    7,993
    661
    468
    Apr 8, 2007
    atlanta
    Yeah, that’s not even close to what happened. Google the word limited, google the word none. Compare results and come back and tell me what you found.
     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  13. philnotfil

    philnotfil GC Hall of Fame

    17,730
    1,789
    1,718
    Apr 8, 2007
    Not models, actual real-world results.

    Trends in County-Level COVID-19 Incidence in Counties With ...

    Dr. Bell: “Data shows that wearing face masks works”; Latest COVID-19 Update (August 12, 2020) | SCDHEC

     
    • Winner Winner x 1
  14. NavyGator93

    NavyGator93 GC Hall of Fame

    1,960
    756
    2,663
    Dec 4, 2015
    Georgia
    People stupid enough to believe masks are just for show is why around 3000 people a day are dying of covid in this country.
    I get it, it is tough not being a selfish a##hole when that is how you have been all your life. I realize it is a personal affront to wear a mask for 10 seconds while you pick up your to go order and that is too large a sacrifice.
     
    • Agree Agree x 1
    • Fistbump/Thanks! Fistbump/Thanks! x 1
    • Winner Winner x 1
  15. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,274
    5,273
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Actually, you are wrong in a number of respects. First, as usual, and as pointed out by other posters, you are ignoring the limits of the study and are arguing that it reaches a conclusion you want it to support, not the findings that the study actually reached.

    Second, and critically, two keys to scientific analysis are replication and the meta analysis across all studies. In this case, the Danish study is not replicated and, as I will point out in a moment, studies after the Danish study support the efficacy of masks and were relied on by the CDC. And, in JAMA, they discussed the meta analysis.

    From the link I posted above:

    In an editorial published today in the Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA), CDC reviewed the latest science and affirms that cloth face coverings are a critical tool in the fight against COVID-19 that could reduce the spread of the disease, particularly when used universally within communities. There is increasing evidence that cloth face coverings help prevent people who have COVID-19 from spreading the virus to others.

    “We are not defenseless against COVID-19,” said CDC Director Dr. Robert R. Redfield. “Cloth face coverings are one of the most powerful weapons we have to slow and stop the spread of the virus – particularly when used universally within a community setting. All Americans have a responsibility to protect themselves, their families, and their communities.”

    This review included two case studies out today, one from JAMA, showing that adherence to universal masking policies reduced SARS-CoV-2 transmission within a Boston hospital system, and one from CDC’s Morbidity and Mortality Weekly Report (MMWR), showing that wearing a mask prevented the spread of infection from two hair stylists to their customers in Missouri.
     
    • Funny Funny x 1
    • Informative Informative x 1
  16. duchen

    duchen VIP Member

    14,274
    5,273
    3,208
    Nov 25, 2017
    Well, I agree with you that the UT game will be easy.
     
  17. gators81

    gators81 Premium Member

    7,993
    661
    468
    Apr 8, 2007
    atlanta
    @gator95 , Honest, serious question here. No need for trolling, snarky responses. What is your goal in constantly attempting to dissuade people from wearing masks. What do you wish to accomplish? If they don’t work, so what?
     
  18. gator95

    gator95 GC Hall of Fame

    7,778
    860
    2,113
    Apr 3, 2007
    I think if masks worked we wouldn’t have the spread rate we currently have and have had for 9 months. Same with Europe. Masks “might” help a super small percentage like 1-2% like the Danish study shows but it’s all for theater. But I think it’s downright dumb to think masks work like people think. People in this thread are making excuse after excuse to ignore the largest best mask study in the world because they didn’t like the results. It’s comical. I can tell you if the biggest best mask study showed masks worked effectively I’d change my tune. I still wear a mask where required but when I visit my mom in a nursing home I think the bigger thing is to maintain social distancing. My question is why wouldn’t people who say they follow science don’t follow the biggest RCT study in the world? That’s the bigger question.
     
  19. homer

    homer GC Hall of Fame

    2,686
    839
    2,078
    Nov 2, 2015
    I see people with clear face shields occasionally. No mask.

    Are they worth wearing?
     
  20. gators81

    gators81 Premium Member

    7,993
    661
    468
    Apr 8, 2007
    atlanta
    I’ve answered your question multiple times, you dodged mine. I didn’t ask if you think they’re effective, we all know that answer. I asked why dissuade people who feel more comfortable wearing them. What do you gain? I’ll humor you and agree that they’re 1-2% effective, is that not more than 0?